Active Users:527 Time:05/11/2024 07:36:10 AM
Err...no. redqueen Send a noteboard - 30/03/2011 11:01:03 PM
We have seen 4 societies (some only glimpses) in Randland and how they candle channeling.

Randland proper: the channelers limit themselves


Not very much. The don't murder with the Power. Other than that, Aes Sedai are the among the least accountable of all the channelers in all the lands. (the Ayyad might be worse, we don't know) I mean - can an Aes Sedai be tried in a court, outside of the White Tower? Would anyone dare? It's like they all have diplomatic immunity. And it's not much better in the Tower - even other Aes Sedai consider it the height of rudeness to so much as ask what their sisters might be up to, never mind question it.

Seanchan: The channelers are enslaved, after they were overthrown.


Yes, but no. The channelers themselves are enslaved, but their power is still used by proxy. The most surprising thing about Seanchan is that the sul'dam haven't taken over.

Shara: The channelers are controlled by making them ignorant figureheads, and then poisoned.


No. The leaders are controlled/compelled by the channelers, the Ayyad, and after seven years, killed and replaced. The Ayyad run Shara, almost certainly by Compulsion.

Then of course we have the Sea Folk, and the Aiel. In neither society do channelers rule. Incidentally, these societies also have both the greatest integration of channelers with the general population, and the greatest self-limitation of channelers.


This message last edited by redqueen on 30/03/2011 at 11:01:22 PM
Reply to message
Aes Sedai without Oaths - 30/03/2011 04:54:32 PM 1587 Views
Re: Aes Sedai without Oaths - 30/03/2011 05:49:56 PM 981 Views
You think? - 30/03/2011 08:33:45 PM 917 Views
Re: You think? - 30/03/2011 08:36:45 PM 901 Views
Think seat belts... - 30/03/2011 09:33:28 PM 945 Views
Aes Sedai without oaths = Seanchan - 30/03/2011 10:36:10 PM 833 Views
Err...no. - 30/03/2011 11:01:03 PM 985 Views
Aes Sedai without Oaths = having to change their organization (an idea they abhor) - 31/03/2011 01:36:05 AM 995 Views
*Cough* Aiel *cough* - 31/03/2011 05:19:21 AM 959 Views
Re: *Cough* Aiel *cough* - 31/03/2011 08:34:51 AM 799 Views
Re: *Cough* Aiel *cough* - 08/04/2011 10:20:42 AM 902 Views
Amys stood up to her and was given near equal status - 08/04/2011 02:32:57 PM 700 Views
A new post?! I nearly spit out my drink - 30/03/2011 11:23:13 PM 898 Views
They could take oaths without the oath rod - 31/03/2011 04:51:58 PM 809 Views
No change indeed - 31/03/2011 07:14:47 PM 811 Views
I think these things would be less of a problem without the oaths actually - 01/04/2011 02:07:12 PM 814 Views
Without the oaths... - 31/03/2011 01:42:46 AM 978 Views
good thinking! especially the BA part *NM* - 31/03/2011 08:42:57 AM 380 Views
Yes for the most part. - 31/03/2011 06:08:48 PM 768 Views
Nice ... Just made a similar comment above! *NM* - 01/04/2011 02:11:51 PM 567 Views
I still haven't lost all faith... I think the pending Seanchan conflict will kill the Oaths - 01/04/2011 01:50:50 PM 883 Views
Elayne did what was best for Andor - 03/04/2011 01:52:59 AM 783 Views
Agreed. Elayne's actions were in the best interest of Andor - 03/04/2011 05:14:15 PM 844 Views
I'm not sure if this is a problem - 07/04/2011 03:46:01 PM 796 Views
hard to say if it's a problem or not - 07/04/2011 07:28:20 PM 788 Views

Reply to Message