So my question: how do you think things would have changed if they had got rid of the Oaths? Would everyone have panicked, joined a Whitecloak army and rushed to burn down Tar Valon?
Likely.
The Oaths are necessary to prevent people from witch-hunting the Aes Sedai: every culture has developed a method to somehow trust them, and if you remove your current method you need to use another one. Failing to replace it with a suitable one will certainly prove dangerous.
--
Io iudico bene questo: che sia meglio essere impetuoso che respettivo, perché la fortuna è donna ed è necessario, volendola tenere sotto, batterla e urtarla.
Io iudico bene questo: che sia meglio essere impetuoso che respettivo, perché la fortuna è donna ed è necessario, volendola tenere sotto, batterla e urtarla.
Aes Sedai without Oaths
- 30/03/2011 04:54:32 PM
1610 Views
Re: Aes Sedai without Oaths
- 30/03/2011 05:49:56 PM
1000 Views
You think?
- 30/03/2011 08:33:45 PM
935 Views
Re: You think?
- 30/03/2011 08:36:45 PM
928 Views
Think seat belts...
- 30/03/2011 09:33:28 PM
959 Views
Aes Sedai without oaths = Seanchan
- 30/03/2011 10:36:10 PM
857 Views
Aes Sedai without Oaths = having to change their organization (an idea they abhor)
- 31/03/2011 01:36:05 AM
1023 Views
*Cough* Aiel *cough*
- 31/03/2011 05:19:21 AM
978 Views
Re: *Cough* Aiel *cough*
- 31/03/2011 08:34:51 AM
816 Views
A new post?! I nearly spit out my drink
- 30/03/2011 11:23:13 PM
916 Views
I think these things would be less of a problem without the oaths actually
- 01/04/2011 02:07:12 PM
835 Views
I still haven't lost all faith... I think the pending Seanchan conflict will kill the Oaths
- 01/04/2011 01:50:50 PM
905 Views
Elayne did what was best for Andor
- 03/04/2011 01:52:59 AM
799 Views
Agreed. Elayne's actions were in the best interest of Andor
- 03/04/2011 05:14:15 PM
867 Views