Active Users:1168 Time:22/11/2024 09:33:43 PM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
Osan'gaar only died by good old fashioned fire... *NM* entyti Send a noteboard - 25/03/2011 08:15:40 PM
A number of forsaken have died, then come back to life over the years and it strikes me as very likely that they will come back to life now that the last battle has begun presuming they weren't destroyed by balefire.

Unfortunately, my wot comprehension is not what it used to be so I'm wondering what Forsaken are actually dead for good and which one's MIGHT come back. Idk why but I feel like aran'gar is going to come back, somehow...

I know Rahvin is dead for good and so is Bel'al, but I can't remember who else. It strikes me that Asmodean probably won't come back bc he sucked so much to begin with but who knows.

Any ideas?
Omnipresent Lurker of WoTMB
Proud and Open Rolan Sympathiser
Fan of Everything Tool
Eternal Shiva Enthusiast
Reply to message
Forsaken-Who's Actually Dead? MalkierKnight - 25/03/2011 03:31:48 PM 5134 Views
Asmodean is forever gone. Nargs - 25/03/2011 05:43:45 PM 742 Views
Greandal is out of the picture. Nargs - 25/03/2011 05:45:22 PM 891 Views
*nm* Nargs - 25/03/2011 05:47:05 PM 629 Views
Lanfear is floating around somewhere. Nargs - 25/03/2011 05:47:43 PM 765 Views
...what? They drained her too quickly and killed her. Ghavrel - 29/03/2011 08:28:08 AM 637 Views
Moghedien is around but Mind Trapped. Nargs - 25/03/2011 05:48:58 PM 638 Views
Semirhage was Baelfired. Gone. Nargs - 25/03/2011 05:50:19 PM 631 Views
Sammael was supposedly Baelfired but... Nargs - 25/03/2011 05:52:15 PM 799 Views
Re: Sammael was supposedly Baelfired but... DomA - 25/03/2011 06:19:20 PM 886 Views
Rhavin was baelfired for sure. Nargs - 25/03/2011 05:53:20 PM 695 Views
Re: Forsaken-Who's Actually Dead? DomA - 25/03/2011 06:08:49 PM 987 Views
I appreciate you acknowledging the admittedly remote possibility of Be'lals return. Joel - 27/03/2011 03:57:45 PM 673 Views
The DO was aware of Asmodean's death immediately darius_sedai - 27/03/2011 04:35:55 PM 678 Views
That does not follow from that passage. Joel - 28/03/2011 11:19:33 PM 667 Views
Re: That does not follow from that passage. DomA - 29/03/2011 01:48:25 PM 645 Views
Re: That does not follow from that passage. Joel - 01/04/2011 01:10:33 AM 636 Views
#1 reason (other that BF)I don't buy the Taim =Be'lal theory is Taim's disdain for the sword darius_sedai - 01/04/2011 01:32:49 PM 607 Views
That assumes Be'lal isn't smart enough to use a misdirection ploy. Joel - 01/04/2011 11:59:26 PM 633 Views
I'm 99% certain RJ is quoted as saying Taim is not a new Forsaken .. I'll have to look for the quote darius_sedai - 02/04/2011 06:28:41 PM 557 Views
Re: That does not follow from that passage. DomA - 02/04/2011 07:45:17 PM 591 Views
While I agree that Taim is most likely Taim, I don't see Demandred as the mastermind here darius_sedai - 03/04/2011 05:22:07 PM 545 Views
Demandred told us this was 1 day after the events in Caemlyn. darius_sedai - 01/04/2011 01:26:50 PM 536 Views
Graendal's the most likely source of the DOs knowledge about Asmo, but thereby hangs the tale. Joel - 01/04/2011 11:48:27 PM 534 Views
I still can't see Be'lal coming back ... what does that do for the story? darius_sedai - 02/04/2011 06:22:33 PM 586 Views
Who do you think will be the last Forsaken--Lanfear or Ishamael? *NM* Ghavrel - 29/03/2011 08:32:41 AM 267 Views
Ishy Tweak - 29/03/2011 12:52:08 PM 615 Views
RAFO? DomA - 29/03/2011 01:05:47 PM 667 Views
I think Graendal will be back. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 29/03/2011 05:36:19 PM 639 Views
Osan'gaar only died by good old fashioned fire... *NM* entyti - 25/03/2011 08:15:40 PM 312 Views
Let's see who's out there darius_sedai - 26/03/2011 04:28:17 PM 832 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Formatting
Smiley Codes