Then why do you keep trying to qualify the passage in relation to him?
Fanatic-Templar Send a noteboard - 25/02/2011 06:29:31 PM
My statement was that aesthetic value is important. You shouldn't take "paint pretty pictures" literally - that should have been obvious. The beginning phrase of Lolita is obviously written well. If you think it isn't, then say it isn't and explain why. If you think it is, there's no need to further explain things.
You made the assertion, you need to support it. I do believe it is well written, but as you have claimed yourself, 'well written' comprises multiple aspects. You claimed that these passages had aesthetic value because they paint beautiful images. I do not understand how this - this specific quality to this specific passage - is so, hence my question. If you meant something else, please rephrase it. If you did mean it as such, can you explain why you believe it is so?
If you don't understand what I'm talking about generally, then you really need to read a book that is well written from cover to cover to understand. Just because you don't like my brief selection doesn't mean that there aren't examples of well-written books (from an aesthetic perspective) out there.
So please, quit with the faux-naive Socratic questioning.
So please, quit with the faux-naive Socratic questioning.
My question was an honest question, and the fact that you are incapable of answering it says more about you than it does about me. Frankly, this conversation bores me. If you remain unable or unwilling to answer the simple question I have asked, do not expect further replies from me.
The first rule of being a ninja is "do no harm". Unless you intend to do harm, then do lots of harm.
~Master Splinter
Victorious in Bergioyn's legendary 'Reverse Mafia'. *MySmiley*
~Master Splinter
Victorious in Bergioyn's legendary 'Reverse Mafia'. *MySmiley*
Can someone explain to me how Jordan is not a particularly good writer?
21/02/2011 05:41:31 PM
- 3289 Views
I personally see it as more of RJ being a fantastic story teller, but not a well structured writer.
21/02/2011 06:44:21 PM
- 1675 Views
Re: I personally see it as more of RJ being a fantastic story teller, but not a well structured
22/02/2011 10:59:25 PM
- 1296 Views
What do you think about the Southern Gothic authors?
23/02/2011 08:08:26 AM
- 1181 Views
Re: What do you think about the Southern Gothic authors?
23/02/2011 10:51:57 AM
- 1268 Views
For the same reason that most people think they have above average intelligence.
21/02/2011 11:13:34 PM
- 1636 Views
Re: For the same reason that most people think they have above average intelligence. *NM*
22/02/2011 02:39:20 PM
- 899 Views
Re: For the same reason that most people think they have above average intelligence.
22/02/2011 02:41:37 PM
- 1111 Views
That's possibly the best explanation of literary criticism I've ever seen.
23/02/2011 02:47:12 AM
- 1235 Views
I can take a shot at that, since nobody else seems willing to.
22/02/2011 07:29:20 AM
- 1700 Views

Re: I can take a shot at that, since nobody else seems willing to.
22/02/2011 11:23:38 PM
- 1324 Views

That has very little to do with anything unless you can provide a real-world analogy to a channeler.
22/02/2011 11:30:52 PM
- 1238 Views
Re: That has very little to do with anything unless you can provide a real-world analogy to a
23/02/2011 12:02:24 AM
- 1286 Views
As far as I'm concerned, the only way to gauge whether an author is good or not is ...
22/02/2011 03:58:17 PM
- 1226 Views
Re: Can someone explain to me how Jordan is not a particularly good writer?
22/02/2011 06:27:11 PM
- 2088 Views
I think it has more to do with limitations imposed by how the story was organized and edited.
22/02/2011 07:50:18 PM
- 1593 Views
That's interesting, and I have a weird agree/disagree here; also, that Adam Roberts sucks
23/02/2011 02:15:12 AM
- 1345 Views
Re: That's interesting, and I have a weird agree/disagree here; also, that Adam Roberts sucks
23/02/2011 11:02:14 AM
- 1314 Views
adam roberts reviews
23/02/2011 03:53:49 AM
- 1305 Views
And I suspect those who prefer the BS books are those who largely read WoT for the story. *NM*
23/02/2011 08:06:16 AM
- 757 Views
Oh GAWD!... not another pointer to Robert Adam's incoherant muckraking
24/02/2011 07:47:35 PM
- 1156 Views
I think DomA answered the question best, but the "do you like it" argument is weak.
22/02/2011 10:32:51 PM
- 1467 Views
Re: I think DomA answered the question best, but the "do you like it" argument is weak.
22/02/2011 11:16:24 PM
- 1411 Views
The Necronomicon isn't actually a book, you know.
*NM*
22/02/2011 11:28:29 PM
- 714 Views

There are nine, actually...
23/02/2011 12:04:55 AM
- 1472 Views
Lovecraft's Necronomicon was fictitious. If you want to count fanfiction, fine. *NM*
23/02/2011 12:38:07 AM
- 777 Views
Based on how poorly worded that response was, I'm not sure what to think of it. *NM*
23/02/2011 12:13:00 AM
- 757 Views
I hope I am misunderstanding you.
23/02/2011 10:57:47 PM
- 1159 Views
Re: I hope I am misunderstanding you.
24/02/2011 10:41:09 AM
- 1289 Views
If the core of the story is all that matters, why read a book
24/02/2011 10:32:01 PM
- 1251 Views
Re: If the core of the story is all that matters, why read a book
24/02/2011 11:23:42 PM
- 1086 Views
So wait, style is good?
25/02/2011 12:32:07 AM
- 1480 Views
That depends...
23/02/2011 03:00:35 AM
- 1380 Views
I didn't say aesthetics was the primary criterion. I named three criteria.
23/02/2011 05:39:03 AM
- 1242 Views
the "do you like it" is the most important criterion
23/02/2011 10:45:17 PM
- 1241 Views
If you don't mind me asking...
24/02/2011 01:05:12 AM
- 1058 Views
I don't mind that you ask, but I'm not going to engage in a defense of literature.
24/02/2011 05:35:27 PM
- 1077 Views
Re: I don't mind that you ask, but I'm not going to engage in a defense of literature.
24/02/2011 11:26:55 PM
- 1231 Views
I'm sure you have a wonderful job awaiting in fast food service.
25/02/2011 01:57:15 AM
- 1280 Views
Re: I'm sure you have a wonderful job awaiting in fast food service.
25/02/2011 08:56:06 AM
- 1182 Views
...
25/02/2011 01:07:22 AM
- 1138 Views
It is not a serious question.
25/02/2011 01:53:59 AM
- 1121 Views
Is that so?
25/02/2011 05:58:31 AM
- 1206 Views
I'm not fixated with Jordan.
25/02/2011 03:13:56 PM
- 1222 Views
Then why do you keep trying to qualify the passage in relation to him?
25/02/2011 06:29:31 PM
- 1267 Views
You're conflating two things.
25/02/2011 07:32:59 PM
- 1242 Views
All right, now we're getting somewhere.
26/02/2011 12:40:57 AM
- 1169 Views
Okay, here you go. I am giving you the benefit of the doubt as to your sincerity.
26/02/2011 03:20:44 PM
- 989 Views
Thank you, and I agree with all your explanations. *NM*
26/02/2011 07:28:09 PM
- 726 Views
No, it is a serious question, just one that can never be seriously answered.
25/02/2011 03:28:48 PM
- 1144 Views
Your opinion isn't as valid as anyone else's if that's your opinion.
25/02/2011 04:44:57 PM
- 1305 Views
Re: Your opinion isn't as valid as anyone else's if that's your opinion.
25/02/2011 06:05:18 PM
- 1712 Views
I'm not wasting my time proving something to an internet moron and troll like you.
25/02/2011 07:36:19 PM
- 1070 Views
Ah yes, the wonderful "dissmiss the person who disagrees with me by insulting him tactic"
28/02/2011 02:30:35 PM
- 1088 Views
Re: Your opinion isn't as valid as anyone else's if that's your opinion.
26/02/2011 11:06:26 AM
- 1119 Views
Re: I find this whole thing elitist and more than a bit silly
23/02/2011 06:45:05 AM
- 1291 Views
Why do you think mind-expanding literature is restricted to the classics?
23/02/2011 08:03:59 AM
- 1120 Views
Re: Why do you think mind-expanding literature is restricted to the classics?
23/02/2011 09:25:10 AM
- 1311 Views
Of course people read for pleasure.
23/02/2011 09:04:24 PM
- 1078 Views
Ok...
24/02/2011 08:59:27 AM
- 1122 Views
"Yeah well, that's, like, just your opinion, man." Good argument.
24/02/2011 03:43:24 PM
- 1194 Views
I'm curious to hear who Tom and DomA consider a "very good writer"?
24/02/2011 05:49:13 PM
- 1181 Views
Among living writers?
24/02/2011 08:16:08 PM
- 1245 Views
My list would be similar...
26/02/2011 07:24:11 AM
- 1349 Views
That was a very good list.
26/02/2011 03:07:31 PM
- 1193 Views
Re: That was a very good list.
27/02/2011 04:51:43 AM
- 1249 Views
Oh, and another question
27/02/2011 05:28:47 PM
- 1006 Views
Re: Oh, and another question
01/03/2011 03:42:02 AM
- 1188 Views
I think the two of you have taken too narrow a meaning of 'great'
27/02/2011 11:14:30 AM
- 1294 Views
Re: I think the two of you have taken too narrow a meaning of 'great'
28/02/2011 11:51:49 PM
- 1319 Views
Re: I think the two of you have taken too narrow a meaning of 'great'
03/03/2011 12:01:30 AM
- 1225 Views
Re: I think the two of you have taken too narrow a meaning of 'great'
03/03/2011 02:17:06 PM
- 1173 Views
He's a great storyteller, but his prose is somewhat uninspiring. *NM*
27/02/2011 07:28:00 PM
- 802 Views