Active Users:617 Time:24/02/2025 08:57:38 AM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
Re: Your opinion isn't as valid as anyone else's if that's your opinion. HyogaRott Send a noteboard - 25/02/2011 06:05:18 PM
That absurd rant almost puts you on par with "Lo'oris" for stupidity.

You first say that everything is subjective, then you say that a cross in urine is objectively not art. That position is exactly how people defend modern art - everything is subjective. Pick a position and stick with it.

You are fully within your rights to say that everyone has their own tastes as to what they like and don't like. I don't think anyone here at any point was trying to say that people don't have a right to like Robert Jordan or anyone else for that matter.

However, your reductionist argument is useless. By that standard, someone who writes a book where every sentence looks like "The ddog jumt and itwer happi with sanwichus becuz she think God wil b 2 happi and SAILBOAT!" is "well written". If there is no way of using consensus to agree on criteria by which something can be judged for value than nothing has any meaning at all. Why learn anything at all?

I find it amazing how violently stupid so many of you are here at the WoT board. It's like I wandered into a trailer park or something.


If 10 million people like your book "The ddog jumt and itwer happi with sanwichus becuz she think God wil b 2 happi and SAILBOAT!" well...

The concept of "everything is relative" is far from stupid; your inane example however may well qualify. “Everything is relative” is a concept championed by many of your beloved "good" writers in their "classics".

If you are going to declare "..how violently stupid so many of you are here at the WoT board..." please post your MENSA invitation or IQ score; I will happily post mine. Until then I am quite sure you are capable of guessing which bodily orifice you can insert your snobbery into.

You were the one that placed the introduction of Lolita a an example of "good" prose. You were the one who has refused to explain why it was good. You are the one who refuses to admit that your definition of "good" is completely subjective and in no way more definitive than that of anyone else. You are teh one who retreats behind insults when you are questioned. You are the one who has questioned (insulted would be more accurate) the intelligence of everyone else on this board who dares to disagree with you.

I asked in a quick poll recently who people though could be Rand reborn in our age, I think we now know who Joseph McCarthy was reborn as.
Reply to message
Can someone explain to me how Jordan is not a particularly good writer? newyorkersedai - 21/02/2011 05:41:31 PM 3274 Views
I personally see it as more of RJ being a fantastic story teller, but not a well structured writer. darius_sedai - 21/02/2011 06:44:21 PM 1662 Views
Re: I personally see it as more of RJ being a fantastic story teller, but not a well structured Lo'oris - 22/02/2011 10:59:25 PM 1285 Views
What do you think about the Southern Gothic authors? Ghavrel - 23/02/2011 08:08:26 AM 1165 Views
Re: What do you think about the Southern Gothic authors? Lo'oris - 23/02/2011 10:51:57 AM 1257 Views
Oh, it really depends. Ghavrel - 23/02/2011 05:39:07 PM 997 Views
thanks, I'll have a look *NM* Lo'oris - 23/02/2011 05:40:50 PM 804 Views
For the same reason that most people think they have above average intelligence. RabidWombat - 21/02/2011 11:13:34 PM 1621 Views
Thank you. Nargs - 21/02/2011 11:43:08 PM 1366 Views
Re: For the same reason that most people think they have above average intelligence. *NM* Gerbeaud - 22/02/2011 02:39:20 PM 896 Views
Re: For the same reason that most people think they have above average intelligence. Gerbeaud - 22/02/2011 02:41:37 PM 1094 Views
Well Said! Evil_Monkey - 22/02/2011 02:42:22 PM 1285 Views
That's possibly the best explanation of literary criticism I've ever seen. The Count - 23/02/2011 02:47:12 AM 1219 Views
I can take a shot at that, since nobody else seems willing to. Ghavrel - 22/02/2011 07:29:20 AM 1688 Views
Do you enjoy reading Robert Jordan's ... Nargs - 22/02/2011 04:31:28 PM 1353 Views
Not particularly. Ghavrel - 22/02/2011 10:22:00 PM 1471 Views
Agreed. Tom - 22/02/2011 10:37:08 PM 1231 Views
Re: I can take a shot at that, since nobody else seems willing to. Lo'oris - 22/02/2011 11:23:38 PM 1310 Views
That has very little to do with anything unless you can provide a real-world analogy to a channeler. Ghavrel - 22/02/2011 11:30:52 PM 1227 Views
Re: That has very little to do with anything unless you can provide a real-world analogy to a Lo'oris - 23/02/2011 12:02:24 AM 1272 Views
As far as I'm concerned, the only way to gauge whether an author is good or not is ... Velveti - 22/02/2011 03:58:17 PM 1209 Views
Amen *NM* Nargs - 22/02/2011 04:32:50 PM 792 Views
Re: Can someone explain to me how Jordan is not a particularly good writer? DomA - 22/02/2011 06:27:11 PM 2073 Views
Brain overload! This is really well thought out. RabidWombat - 23/02/2011 10:22:37 PM 1262 Views
thank you for the insight into the outside view lol Onarishma - 24/02/2011 04:34:57 PM 1314 Views
I think it has more to do with limitations imposed by how the story was organized and edited. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 22/02/2011 07:50:18 PM 1579 Views
That's interesting, and I have a weird agree/disagree here; also, that Adam Roberts sucks newyorkersedai - 23/02/2011 02:15:12 AM 1329 Views
Re: That's interesting, and I have a weird agree/disagree here; also, that Adam Roberts sucks Lo'oris - 23/02/2011 11:02:14 AM 1295 Views
adam roberts reviews uglycat - 23/02/2011 03:53:49 AM 1288 Views
And I suspect those who prefer the BS books are those who largely read WoT for the story. *NM* Ghavrel - 23/02/2011 08:06:16 AM 748 Views
Oh GAWD!... not another pointer to Robert Adam's incoherant muckraking HyogaRott - 24/02/2011 07:47:35 PM 1144 Views
I think DomA answered the question best, but the "do you like it" argument is weak. Tom - 22/02/2011 10:32:51 PM 1446 Views
Re: I think DomA answered the question best, but the "do you like it" argument is weak. Lo'oris - 22/02/2011 11:16:24 PM 1391 Views
The Necronomicon isn't actually a book, you know. *NM* Ghavrel - 22/02/2011 11:28:29 PM 710 Views
There are nine, actually... Lo'oris - 23/02/2011 12:04:55 AM 1455 Views
Lovecraft's Necronomicon was fictitious. If you want to count fanfiction, fine. *NM* Ghavrel - 23/02/2011 12:38:07 AM 774 Views
Based on how poorly worded that response was, I'm not sure what to think of it. *NM* Tom - 23/02/2011 12:13:00 AM 753 Views
I hope I am misunderstanding you. Stephen - 23/02/2011 10:57:47 PM 1146 Views
Re: I hope I am misunderstanding you. Lo'oris - 24/02/2011 10:41:09 AM 1276 Views
If the core of the story is all that matters, why read a book Stephen - 24/02/2011 10:32:01 PM 1240 Views
Re: If the core of the story is all that matters, why read a book Lo'oris - 24/02/2011 11:23:42 PM 1071 Views
So wait, style is good? Stephen - 25/02/2011 12:32:07 AM 1469 Views
Re: So wait, style is good? Lo'oris - 25/02/2011 08:53:55 AM 1122 Views
I'm not trolling Stephen - 25/02/2011 11:57:18 PM 1146 Views
That depends... DomA - 23/02/2011 03:00:35 AM 1367 Views
I didn't say aesthetics was the primary criterion. I named three criteria. Tom - 23/02/2011 05:39:03 AM 1231 Views
the "do you like it" is the most important criterion RabidWombat - 23/02/2011 10:45:17 PM 1231 Views
Re: the "do you like it" is the most important criterion DomA - 24/02/2011 01:53:59 AM 1218 Views
Thumbs up - IMHO, all discussion can end here Nargs - 28/02/2011 05:45:34 PM 1351 Views
Not for quality of writing. Tom - 24/02/2011 05:17:52 PM 1174 Views
Those who can do, the rest are critics. *NM* HyogaRott - 24/02/2011 07:55:50 PM 764 Views
I object, sir! People don't read WoT for the way it's told? newyorkersedai - 24/02/2011 12:58:58 AM 1283 Views
If you don't mind me asking... Fanatic-Templar - 24/02/2011 01:05:12 AM 1048 Views
Re: If you don't mind me asking... DomA - 24/02/2011 02:19:17 AM 1167 Views
I still don't get it. Fanatic-Templar - 24/02/2011 08:27:50 AM 1069 Views
Re: If you don't mind me asking... Lo'oris - 24/02/2011 11:29:14 PM 1111 Views
I don't mind that you ask, but I'm not going to engage in a defense of literature. Tom - 24/02/2011 05:35:27 PM 1061 Views
Re: I don't mind that you ask, but I'm not going to engage in a defense of literature. Lo'oris - 24/02/2011 11:26:55 PM 1217 Views
I'm sure you have a wonderful job awaiting in fast food service. Tom - 25/02/2011 01:57:15 AM 1266 Views
Re: I'm sure you have a wonderful job awaiting in fast food service. Lo'oris - 25/02/2011 08:56:06 AM 1163 Views
Jack @$$ snobbery at its best. WOW *NM* Nargs - 28/02/2011 05:48:43 PM 801 Views
... Fanatic-Templar - 25/02/2011 01:07:22 AM 1126 Views
Maybe you should have used better prose? fionwe1987 - 25/02/2011 01:23:17 AM 963 Views
It is not a serious question. Tom - 25/02/2011 01:53:59 AM 1106 Views
How so? fionwe1987 - 25/02/2011 02:59:05 AM 1247 Views
I have every right to use that tone. Tom - 25/02/2011 03:08:14 PM 1194 Views
Is that so? Fanatic-Templar - 25/02/2011 05:58:31 AM 1192 Views
I'm not fixated with Jordan. Tom - 25/02/2011 03:13:56 PM 1208 Views
Then why do you keep trying to qualify the passage in relation to him? Fanatic-Templar - 25/02/2011 06:29:31 PM 1256 Views
You're conflating two things. Tom - 25/02/2011 07:32:59 PM 1231 Views
All right, now we're getting somewhere. Fanatic-Templar - 26/02/2011 12:40:57 AM 1157 Views
you raise very good questions... *NM* Nargs - 26/02/2011 09:21:13 AM 703 Views
Okay, here you go. I am giving you the benefit of the doubt as to your sincerity. Tom - 26/02/2011 03:20:44 PM 979 Views
Thank you, and I agree with all your explanations. *NM* Fanatic-Templar - 26/02/2011 07:28:09 PM 723 Views
Glad to hear that. Tom - 27/02/2011 03:42:33 AM 1059 Views
No problem, these things happen on the internet. *NM* Fanatic-Templar - 27/02/2011 04:36:57 AM 774 Views
No, it is a serious question, just one that can never be seriously answered. HyogaRott - 25/02/2011 03:28:48 PM 1132 Views
Your opinion isn't as valid as anyone else's if that's your opinion. Tom - 25/02/2011 04:44:57 PM 1292 Views
Re: Your opinion isn't as valid as anyone else's if that's your opinion. HyogaRott - 25/02/2011 06:05:18 PM 1701 Views
I'm not wasting my time proving something to an internet moron and troll like you. Tom - 25/02/2011 07:36:19 PM 1057 Views
Ah yes, the wonderful "dissmiss the person who disagrees with me by insulting him tactic" HyogaRott - 28/02/2011 02:30:35 PM 1069 Views
Re: Your opinion isn't as valid as anyone else's if that's your opinion. Lo'oris - 26/02/2011 11:06:26 AM 1108 Views
Jack @$$ snobbery at its best. WOW *NM* Nargs - 28/02/2011 05:51:48 PM 630 Views
double post. oh my! *NM* Nargs - 28/02/2011 05:52:17 PM 657 Views
Just makes you right twice *NM* HyogaRott - 28/02/2011 09:42:19 PM 759 Views
Re: ... Lo'oris - 25/02/2011 08:59:37 AM 1171 Views
And part 2, on the analysis of writing. newyorkersedai - 24/02/2011 01:16:20 AM 1187 Views
Florid desciption is usually not a good thing. Tom - 24/02/2011 05:30:30 PM 1141 Views
Re: I find this whole thing elitist and more than a bit silly GarethBryne - 23/02/2011 06:45:05 AM 1275 Views
Why do you think mind-expanding literature is restricted to the classics? Ghavrel - 23/02/2011 08:03:59 AM 1110 Views
Re: Why do you think mind-expanding literature is restricted to the classics? GarethBryne - 23/02/2011 09:25:10 AM 1298 Views
Of course people read for pleasure. Ghavrel - 23/02/2011 09:04:24 PM 1069 Views
Ok... Nargs - 24/02/2011 08:59:27 AM 1111 Views
"Yeah well, that's, like, just your opinion, man." Good argument. Ghavrel - 24/02/2011 03:43:24 PM 1183 Views
*NM* Tom - 24/02/2011 05:37:02 PM 674 Views
I find your above average tastes and intelligence uninspiring. Nargs - 24/02/2011 08:42:03 PM 1048 Views
I'm curious to hear who Tom and DomA consider a "very good writer"? VTHokie - 24/02/2011 05:49:13 PM 1169 Views
Among living writers? Tom - 24/02/2011 08:16:08 PM 1230 Views
No Rushdie? fionwe1987 - 24/02/2011 09:22:46 PM 1125 Views
I was considering mentioning Rushdie. Tom - 24/02/2011 09:32:20 PM 1070 Views
My list would be similar... DomA - 26/02/2011 07:24:11 AM 1336 Views
That was a very good list. Tom - 26/02/2011 03:07:31 PM 1181 Views
Re: That was a very good list. DomA - 27/02/2011 04:51:43 AM 1234 Views
Once I finish Hugo I'm probably going to read Druon. Tom - 27/02/2011 02:30:03 PM 1019 Views
Oh, and another question Tom - 27/02/2011 05:28:47 PM 992 Views
Re: Oh, and another question DomA - 01/03/2011 03:42:02 AM 1171 Views
One final question, if you'll indulge me... Tom - 01/03/2011 06:43:23 PM 1059 Views
Well, until I have time to return to your previous post but... DomA - 01/03/2011 07:45:13 PM 1205 Views
I think the two of you have taken too narrow a meaning of 'great' Iain83 - 27/02/2011 11:14:30 AM 1277 Views
You like Solzhenitsyn but not other Russian writers? Tom - 27/02/2011 02:43:46 PM 1192 Views
Re: You like Solzhenitsyn but not other Russian writers? Iain83 - 02/03/2011 11:47:19 PM 1289 Views
Re: I think the two of you have taken too narrow a meaning of 'great' DomA - 28/02/2011 11:51:49 PM 1303 Views
Re: I think the two of you have taken too narrow a meaning of 'great' Iain83 - 03/03/2011 12:01:30 AM 1214 Views
Link to DomA Post from up above: Nargs - 03/03/2011 12:20:11 AM 1447 Views
Re: I think the two of you have taken too narrow a meaning of 'great' DomA - 03/03/2011 02:17:06 PM 1157 Views
He's a great storyteller, but his prose is somewhat uninspiring. *NM* Marshall - 27/02/2011 07:28:00 PM 797 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes