Active Users:334 Time:09/04/2025 07:57:45 AM
No, it is a serious question, just one that can never be seriously answered. HyogaRott Send a noteboard - 25/02/2011 03:28:48 PM
Art critics, Music critics, Literature critics, all the self appointed judges of what is "GOOD" none of you can justify beyond "Because I think so" and "Because my teachers/professors told me so."

I have news for all of you, my opinion is just as valid as yours, and I don't need to try to dredge up some century dead book written in another language to justify myself either.

A cross floating in a jar of urine is not art no matter how many self-important “experts” think it should be. Popular appeal of a novel is the ONLY definition of a good novel, whether you like it or not.

Yes you can evaluate a manuscript for prose and structure. You can search for hidden meanings. HAVE FUN. But the bottom line questions are:
Did you enjoy it?
Would you read it again?

And the answers will be different for many different people.

You may like On Walden Pond, I think he was a complete loser that should be hit upside his head with the hammer he was so proud of stealing. You may find The Invisible Man to be a thought provoking insight into racial oppression. I just think the guy should STFU and get on with living his life. You think RJ wasted too much time describing things that didn’t need to be; I think Thomas Hardy’s garbage would have been decent flash stories with a REALLY good editor. You can go back through the threads to find my opinion on Adam’s bound collection of toilet paper that should have been flushed.

Opinions vary, and yes, like all of you, I think mine are correct and yours are wrong; otherwise I would have yours.

There was a little turtle, he lived in a box. He swam in a puddle, and climbed on some rocks.

He snapped at a mosquito, he snapped at a flea, he snapped at a minnow and he snapped at me.

He caught the mosquito, he caught the flea, he caught the minnow, but he didn't catch me.

Complete nonsense poem. No hidden meanings, VERY simplistic rhyme and meter pattern; but always been one of my favorites. Personally I think it is better than anything Poe ever wrote, ranks right up there with Frost's Road not taken. It is my opinion. I however, do not demean people as stupid just because they do not share it.
Reply to message
Can someone explain to me how Jordan is not a particularly good writer? - 21/02/2011 05:41:31 PM 3294 Views
I personally see it as more of RJ being a fantastic story teller, but not a well structured writer. - 21/02/2011 06:44:21 PM 1679 Views
Re: I personally see it as more of RJ being a fantastic story teller, but not a well structured - 22/02/2011 10:59:25 PM 1300 Views
What do you think about the Southern Gothic authors? - 23/02/2011 08:08:26 AM 1185 Views
Re: What do you think about the Southern Gothic authors? - 23/02/2011 10:51:57 AM 1272 Views
Oh, it really depends. - 23/02/2011 05:39:07 PM 1012 Views
thanks, I'll have a look *NM* - 23/02/2011 05:40:50 PM 812 Views
For the same reason that most people think they have above average intelligence. - 21/02/2011 11:13:34 PM 1640 Views
Thank you. - 21/02/2011 11:43:08 PM 1386 Views
Well Said! - 22/02/2011 02:42:22 PM 1300 Views
I can take a shot at that, since nobody else seems willing to. - 22/02/2011 07:29:20 AM 1704 Views
Do you enjoy reading Robert Jordan's ... - 22/02/2011 04:31:28 PM 1369 Views
Not particularly. - 22/02/2011 10:22:00 PM 1493 Views
Agreed. - 22/02/2011 10:37:08 PM 1248 Views
As far as I'm concerned, the only way to gauge whether an author is good or not is ... - 22/02/2011 03:58:17 PM 1229 Views
Amen *NM* - 22/02/2011 04:32:50 PM 798 Views
Re: Can someone explain to me how Jordan is not a particularly good writer? - 22/02/2011 06:27:11 PM 2091 Views
Brain overload! This is really well thought out. - 23/02/2011 10:22:37 PM 1280 Views
thank you for the insight into the outside view lol - 24/02/2011 04:34:57 PM 1337 Views
I think DomA answered the question best, but the "do you like it" argument is weak. - 22/02/2011 10:32:51 PM 1474 Views
Re: I think DomA answered the question best, but the "do you like it" argument is weak. - 22/02/2011 11:16:24 PM 1415 Views
The Necronomicon isn't actually a book, you know. *NM* - 22/02/2011 11:28:29 PM 715 Views
There are nine, actually... - 23/02/2011 12:04:55 AM 1476 Views
I hope I am misunderstanding you. - 23/02/2011 10:57:47 PM 1163 Views
Re: I hope I am misunderstanding you. - 24/02/2011 10:41:09 AM 1292 Views
If the core of the story is all that matters, why read a book - 24/02/2011 10:32:01 PM 1255 Views
Re: If the core of the story is all that matters, why read a book - 24/02/2011 11:23:42 PM 1090 Views
So wait, style is good? - 25/02/2011 12:32:07 AM 1484 Views
Re: So wait, style is good? - 25/02/2011 08:53:55 AM 1137 Views
I'm not trolling - 25/02/2011 11:57:18 PM 1159 Views
That depends... - 23/02/2011 03:00:35 AM 1384 Views
the "do you like it" is the most important criterion - 23/02/2011 10:45:17 PM 1243 Views
Re: the "do you like it" is the most important criterion - 24/02/2011 01:53:59 AM 1234 Views
Thumbs up - IMHO, all discussion can end here - 28/02/2011 05:45:34 PM 1368 Views
Not for quality of writing. - 24/02/2011 05:17:52 PM 1191 Views
Those who can do, the rest are critics. *NM* - 24/02/2011 07:55:50 PM 771 Views
I object, sir! People don't read WoT for the way it's told? - 24/02/2011 12:58:58 AM 1302 Views
If you don't mind me asking... - 24/02/2011 01:05:12 AM 1063 Views
Re: If you don't mind me asking... - 24/02/2011 02:19:17 AM 1193 Views
I still don't get it. - 24/02/2011 08:27:50 AM 1087 Views
Re: If you don't mind me asking... - 24/02/2011 11:29:14 PM 1130 Views
I don't mind that you ask, but I'm not going to engage in a defense of literature. - 24/02/2011 05:35:27 PM 1081 Views
Re: I don't mind that you ask, but I'm not going to engage in a defense of literature. - 24/02/2011 11:26:55 PM 1235 Views
I'm sure you have a wonderful job awaiting in fast food service. - 25/02/2011 01:57:15 AM 1284 Views
Re: I'm sure you have a wonderful job awaiting in fast food service. - 25/02/2011 08:56:06 AM 1182 Views
Jack @$$ snobbery at its best. WOW *NM* - 28/02/2011 05:48:43 PM 807 Views
... - 25/02/2011 01:07:22 AM 1143 Views
Maybe you should have used better prose? - 25/02/2011 01:23:17 AM 981 Views
It is not a serious question. - 25/02/2011 01:53:59 AM 1123 Views
How so? - 25/02/2011 02:59:05 AM 1262 Views
I have every right to use that tone. - 25/02/2011 03:08:14 PM 1215 Views
Is that so? - 25/02/2011 05:58:31 AM 1208 Views
I'm not fixated with Jordan. - 25/02/2011 03:13:56 PM 1223 Views
Then why do you keep trying to qualify the passage in relation to him? - 25/02/2011 06:29:31 PM 1273 Views
You're conflating two things. - 25/02/2011 07:32:59 PM 1246 Views
All right, now we're getting somewhere. - 26/02/2011 12:40:57 AM 1173 Views
you raise very good questions... *NM* - 26/02/2011 09:21:13 AM 711 Views
Okay, here you go. I am giving you the benefit of the doubt as to your sincerity. - 26/02/2011 03:20:44 PM 992 Views
Thank you, and I agree with all your explanations. *NM* - 26/02/2011 07:28:09 PM 728 Views
Glad to hear that. - 27/02/2011 03:42:33 AM 1081 Views
No problem, these things happen on the internet. *NM* - 27/02/2011 04:36:57 AM 783 Views
No, it is a serious question, just one that can never be seriously answered. - 25/02/2011 03:28:48 PM 1146 Views
Your opinion isn't as valid as anyone else's if that's your opinion. - 25/02/2011 04:44:57 PM 1307 Views
Jack @$$ snobbery at its best. WOW *NM* - 28/02/2011 05:51:48 PM 635 Views
double post. oh my! *NM* - 28/02/2011 05:52:17 PM 663 Views
Just makes you right twice *NM* - 28/02/2011 09:42:19 PM 765 Views
Re: ... - 25/02/2011 08:59:37 AM 1184 Views
And part 2, on the analysis of writing. - 24/02/2011 01:16:20 AM 1203 Views
Florid desciption is usually not a good thing. - 24/02/2011 05:30:30 PM 1156 Views
Re: I find this whole thing elitist and more than a bit silly - 23/02/2011 06:45:05 AM 1298 Views
Why do you think mind-expanding literature is restricted to the classics? - 23/02/2011 08:03:59 AM 1123 Views
Re: Why do you think mind-expanding literature is restricted to the classics? - 23/02/2011 09:25:10 AM 1315 Views
Of course people read for pleasure. - 23/02/2011 09:04:24 PM 1082 Views
Ok... - 24/02/2011 08:59:27 AM 1127 Views
"Yeah well, that's, like, just your opinion, man." Good argument. - 24/02/2011 03:43:24 PM 1196 Views
*NM* - 24/02/2011 05:37:02 PM 679 Views
I find your above average tastes and intelligence uninspiring. - 24/02/2011 08:42:03 PM 1066 Views
I'm curious to hear who Tom and DomA consider a "very good writer"? - 24/02/2011 05:49:13 PM 1182 Views
Among living writers? - 24/02/2011 08:16:08 PM 1246 Views
No Rushdie? - 24/02/2011 09:22:46 PM 1140 Views
I was considering mentioning Rushdie. - 24/02/2011 09:32:20 PM 1084 Views
My list would be similar... - 26/02/2011 07:24:11 AM 1353 Views
That was a very good list. - 26/02/2011 03:07:31 PM 1198 Views
Re: That was a very good list. - 27/02/2011 04:51:43 AM 1251 Views
Once I finish Hugo I'm probably going to read Druon. - 27/02/2011 02:30:03 PM 1033 Views
Oh, and another question - 27/02/2011 05:28:47 PM 1009 Views
Re: Oh, and another question - 01/03/2011 03:42:02 AM 1191 Views
One final question, if you'll indulge me... - 01/03/2011 06:43:23 PM 1073 Views
Well, until I have time to return to your previous post but... - 01/03/2011 07:45:13 PM 1221 Views
I think the two of you have taken too narrow a meaning of 'great' - 27/02/2011 11:14:30 AM 1296 Views
You like Solzhenitsyn but not other Russian writers? - 27/02/2011 02:43:46 PM 1206 Views
Re: You like Solzhenitsyn but not other Russian writers? - 02/03/2011 11:47:19 PM 1308 Views
Re: I think the two of you have taken too narrow a meaning of 'great' - 28/02/2011 11:51:49 PM 1323 Views
Re: I think the two of you have taken too narrow a meaning of 'great' - 03/03/2011 12:01:30 AM 1229 Views
Link to DomA Post from up above: - 03/03/2011 12:20:11 AM 1466 Views
He's a great storyteller, but his prose is somewhat uninspiring. *NM* - 27/02/2011 07:28:00 PM 802 Views

Reply to Message