Active Users:793 Time:22/12/2024 09:05:47 PM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
I bloody hope so ajfurst Send a noteboard - 25/02/2011 02:42:35 AM
An announcement that AMOL is now going to be six months later to give it 3 or 4 months extra dedicated editing, continuity checking and subsequent drafts, after the issues with TGS and most blatantly TOM would be music to my ears. After 20 years I want it RIGHT not right now.
Reply to message
Anybody think AMOL will be delayed? Guava - 24/02/2011 05:50:45 PM 1598 Views
I'd rather have a late good book than an on-time crap one *NM* Ava - 24/02/2011 06:37:23 PM 354 Views
agreed, obviously *NM* Lo'oris - 24/02/2011 11:36:15 PM 308 Views
I didn't think he planned to start until May or June. RandAllThor - 24/02/2011 07:40:29 PM 868 Views
Re: I didn't think he planned to start until May or June. Lo'oris - 24/02/2011 11:37:06 PM 828 Views
At least 3 months. Lohikaarme - 24/02/2011 08:14:44 PM 900 Views
Re: Anybody think AMOL will be delayed? rempires - 24/02/2011 11:29:23 PM 855 Views
Sanderson is good at keeping his deadlines, but only because he is willing to sacrifice quality. Cynewulf - 24/02/2011 11:39:20 PM 958 Views
I bloody hope so ajfurst - 25/02/2011 02:42:35 AM 915 Views
I want it fast, not Half Fast. *NM* Evil_Monkey - 25/02/2011 05:28:25 PM 374 Views
His track record says it will be done on time. *NM* everynametaken - 26/02/2011 03:32:32 AM 386 Views
He's no GRRM, so I ain't worried none. *NM* Bookwyrm - 26/02/2011 08:57:41 PM 350 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes