Active Users:1105 Time:22/11/2024 11:50:34 PM
Re: Definitely not Da'covale scooter Send a noteboard - 08/02/2011 06:14:30 AM
Selucia may or may not be property but I lean to the not property view. There was a scene where Selucia was dressing Tuon and there were the usual da'covala there helping her but they never touched Tuon only Selucia did this. I took the way it was written to mean that property would never physically touch someone so high ranking at Tuon hence Selucia being freed.


The context of that passage is that it was quite odd for Selucia herself, as so high ranking Da'covale, to take on the more menial task of not only helping to choose Tuon's wardrobe for the day, but actually dressing Tuon herself. It's simply meant to illustrate how devoted Selucia is and how jealous she is of Tuon's person. She is so devoted, that she views it as a special thing; it has nothing to do with whether she is property or not.
Scooter

Slave to Detail...Damned Purist
Reply to message
Tiny question about Egeanin - 06/02/2011 12:19:48 AM 1456 Views
I scanned the WoT encyclopedia and wot wikia, no mention of her mom, but the library at - 06/02/2011 03:29:00 AM 1371 Views
Why would Egeanin inherit the later slavery? - 07/02/2011 09:27:32 PM 1194 Views
Re: Why would Egeanin inherit the later slavery? - 07/02/2011 11:03:26 PM 1101 Views
DomA sorted it all out, but yes, I'd read that slavery was hereditary. *NM* - 07/02/2011 11:09:27 PM 397 Views
Re: Why would Egeanin inherit the later slavery? - 08/02/2011 11:41:52 AM 814 Views
You do know that the Papacy and the bishopric of Rome are the same, yes? - 08/02/2011 07:03:51 PM 708 Views
OFC - 11/02/2011 02:00:48 PM 863 Views
I most assuredly am not. - 11/02/2011 09:02:42 PM 798 Views
Re: Tiny question about Egeanin - 06/02/2011 01:12:15 PM 1348 Views
Aha - 06/02/2011 03:16:48 PM 1213 Views
Re: Aha - 06/02/2011 10:38:43 PM 1103 Views
Re: Aha - 07/02/2011 12:31:15 AM 1077 Views
Definitely Da'covale - 07/02/2011 04:05:41 AM 859 Views
Re: Definitely not Da'covale - 07/02/2011 11:55:21 AM 1148 Views
Re: Definitely not Da'covale - 08/02/2011 06:14:30 AM 854 Views
Re: Aha - 08/02/2011 11:43:42 AM 765 Views
Re: Aha - 12/02/2011 02:33:31 PM 790 Views
yeah, very well said *NM* - 13/02/2011 07:09:26 PM 355 Views

Reply to Message