Active Users:1161 Time:23/11/2024 01:32:29 AM
You, sir, make no sense! Nargs Send a noteboard - 02/02/2011 01:01:16 AM
You're telling me they were normal Dark Hounds but Temporarily different?

They had MORE power than regular dark hounds? Their nature was altered by the dark one if temporarily? So, they are different at least in that moment in time??

We have Rand's testimony, albiet from a characters possibly flawed perspective, that the Darkhounds are different. They're unlike anything Rand has seen up until then. Whether that is a temporary and/or artificial change doesnt matter. They are different.

Shadar Haran IS a special/different/"new kind" of fade that the forsaken havent seen before.

If I have a robot that is artificially created(obviously) and then I give him some upgrades then he is a new version of his kind.

I am not saying that these are something entirely new and not Dark Hounds at all. Simply that they are new kinds of dark hounds. Temporary change or not. From the Dark One or not. Him manifesting himself in the dark hounds or not. These are not like any dark hounds previously seen by us or Rand. They can be considered a new kind of the kind.

Reply to message
Dark Hounds - Unbeatable? - 26/01/2011 06:02:34 PM 968 Views
why are you saying they can only be killed by balefire? Perrin killed one - 26/01/2011 06:18:47 PM 608 Views
There's more than one type of darkhound- we've seen some that can only be balefired - 26/01/2011 07:32:38 PM 682 Views
Yet it remains unproven that these two were of a different "kind" - 27/01/2011 12:02:38 PM 590 Views
Re: Yet it remains unproven that these two were of a different "kind" - 28/01/2011 06:14:24 PM 483 Views
DomA makes a good point - 28/01/2011 09:14:42 PM 481 Views
Re: DomA DOES NOT makes a good point - 02/02/2011 02:54:27 PM 451 Views
You, sir, make no sense! - 01/02/2011 08:58:16 PM 430 Views
Actually, it DOES make sense - 01/02/2011 10:18:38 PM 408 Views
You, sir, make no sense! - 02/02/2011 01:01:16 AM 496 Views
Internet, thy name is semantics. *NM* - 02/02/2011 08:11:01 AM 189 Views

Reply to Message