Active Users:649 Time:15/11/2024 05:58:35 PM
Re: Wait... the indegenous Seanchan haven't changed in a thousand years? fionwe1987 Send a noteboard - 29/01/2011 10:02:27 PM

I don't necessarily believe this either. However, there is precedent in Shara and the Aiel Waste, and presumably also the Isle of Madmen. If Ajimbura is typical of a rural Seanchan commoner, then the conquerors may be right.

How do you even know Shara is barbaric? And the Aiel are only "barbaric" because they're different from the people in the Wetlands.


Their initial justification is through military might and the threat of force.

Might is right isn't a justification.

However, their hostile takeover is being legitimized through popular support, which they are gaining rapidly. The vast majority of people in the conquered countries (those not counted among the ranks of channelers, high nobility in some cases, and other dissidents) seem to prefer the peace and stability of the Seanchan regime.

So, except for those who oppose them, nobody opposes them? Shocking!
Reply to message
Seanchan Takeover of Randland - 22/01/2011 11:25:36 PM 2067 Views
You mean utter anarchy and a dangerously stratified society? - 23/01/2011 07:24:48 AM 818 Views
The situation in Seanchan isn't that unique - 23/01/2011 07:49:28 AM 846 Views
Except with continous rebellion. - 23/01/2011 12:13:17 PM 835 Views
That's to be expected. - 23/01/2011 12:56:07 PM 796 Views
The anarchy is what happens in the absence of Seanchan power. - 27/01/2011 01:10:56 PM 784 Views
Yes. That is a flaw of Seanchan governance. - 28/01/2011 01:54:00 AM 707 Views
It's not the Empire's fault, and that flaw is not being duplicated in the wetlands - 28/01/2011 11:24:00 PM 963 Views
Wait... the indegenous Seanchan haven't changed in a thousand years? - 29/01/2011 02:09:05 AM 761 Views
Re: Wait... the indegenous Seanchan haven't changed in a thousand years? - 29/01/2011 01:10:36 PM 811 Views
Re: Wait... the indegenous Seanchan haven't changed in a thousand years? - 29/01/2011 10:02:27 PM 663 Views
Re: Wait... the indegenous Seanchan haven't changed in a thousand years? - 30/01/2011 03:56:23 AM 857 Views
They treat channelers like DOGS! so, No. *NM* - 23/01/2011 07:56:22 AM 412 Views
I treat my dog better *NM* - 23/01/2011 10:28:08 AM 404 Views
Good point. *NM* - 24/01/2011 01:47:29 AM 426 Views
The Pattern certainly has some plan or purpose for the Seanchan. - 23/01/2011 10:59:33 AM 902 Views
That's what's scary. In many ways, the Seanchan embody the goals of the Pattern - 23/01/2011 11:41:35 PM 736 Views
I think it's interesting - 24/01/2011 09:23:40 AM 771 Views
There has been ta'veren since Hawkwing and before the Triple. - 28/01/2011 11:56:46 AM 764 Views
Who were they? - 29/01/2011 12:33:58 AM 704 Views
Um, no - 23/01/2011 11:36:24 AM 832 Views
look around you again - 23/01/2011 03:24:01 PM 817 Views
Re: look around you again - 23/01/2011 03:54:49 PM 788 Views
Seanchan equality before the law - 23/01/2011 04:09:54 PM 842 Views
Re: Seanchan equality before the law - 23/01/2011 04:22:28 PM 802 Views
a) most of that is your own extrapolation, not shown in the text - 23/01/2011 04:56:14 PM 780 Views
Yes. - 23/01/2011 04:47:30 PM 775 Views
Mostly, yes. - 23/01/2011 05:57:17 PM 756 Views
Re: Mostly, yes. - 23/01/2011 06:10:10 PM 762 Views
Re: Mostly, yes. - 23/01/2011 06:33:00 PM 811 Views
Re: Mostly, yes. - 23/01/2011 11:03:36 PM 732 Views
Not really - 23/01/2011 07:12:27 PM 757 Views
I disagree. - 25/01/2011 07:17:18 PM 751 Views
I see them as neccessary evil to eventually eliminate channeling. - 24/01/2011 08:04:21 PM 854 Views
Lack of knowledge doesn't mean the One Power vanishes or is destroyed. - 26/01/2011 04:03:22 PM 677 Views
If OP still existed, you'd still have sparkers even "today". *NM* - 26/01/2011 06:34:50 PM 406 Views
Not exactly; genetics are more complicated. - 27/01/2011 09:48:48 PM 748 Views
No - 25/01/2011 05:41:09 PM 869 Views
Ah, um, no. - 29/01/2011 11:53:16 PM 761 Views
The thing is - 04/02/2011 05:29:15 AM 711 Views
They didn't break anything - 04/02/2011 02:13:10 PM 761 Views
Contemplate this then.... - 04/02/2011 10:29:09 PM 789 Views
Re: Contemplate this then.... - 06/02/2011 12:44:21 AM 776 Views

Reply to Message