Active Users:1046 Time:23/02/2025 07:22:35 PM
Re: Wait... the indegenous Seanchan haven't changed in a thousand years? ranagrande Send a noteboard - 29/01/2011 01:10:36 PM
The very idea that a whole continent of people are all untrustworthy and dishonorable is absurd enough, but the only thing you're basing this on is the word of the conquerors of these very people. Of course they're going to claim that they were bringing enlightenment to a barbaric people. That's how most hegemonic powers have justified their expansions in history. I find it absurd that you swallow all their crap completely, and then use this to state that a whole continent is tainted.

I don't necessarily believe this either. However, there is precedent in Shara and the Aiel Waste, and presumably also the Isle of Madmen. If Ajimbura is typical of a rural Seanchan commoner, then the conquerors may be right.

Further, if the people of the Wetlands have an inherent system of justice and honor that will allow them to survive the absence of the Seanchan, what justification do they have for their invasion and their intent to export their bigotry and persecution?

Their initial justification is through military might and the threat of force. However, their hostile takeover is being legitimized through popular support, which they are gaining rapidly. The vast majority of people in the conquered countries (those not counted among the ranks of channelers, high nobility in some cases, and other dissidents) seem to prefer the peace and stability of the Seanchan regime.
Reply to message
Seanchan Takeover of Randland - 22/01/2011 11:25:36 PM 2137 Views
You mean utter anarchy and a dangerously stratified society? - 23/01/2011 07:24:48 AM 880 Views
The situation in Seanchan isn't that unique - 23/01/2011 07:49:28 AM 917 Views
Except with continous rebellion. - 23/01/2011 12:13:17 PM 908 Views
That's to be expected. - 23/01/2011 12:56:07 PM 863 Views
The anarchy is what happens in the absence of Seanchan power. - 27/01/2011 01:10:56 PM 851 Views
Yes. That is a flaw of Seanchan governance. - 28/01/2011 01:54:00 AM 781 Views
It's not the Empire's fault, and that flaw is not being duplicated in the wetlands - 28/01/2011 11:24:00 PM 1030 Views
Wait... the indegenous Seanchan haven't changed in a thousand years? - 29/01/2011 02:09:05 AM 796 Views
Re: Wait... the indegenous Seanchan haven't changed in a thousand years? - 29/01/2011 01:10:36 PM 881 Views
They treat channelers like DOGS! so, No. *NM* - 23/01/2011 07:56:22 AM 442 Views
I treat my dog better *NM* - 23/01/2011 10:28:08 AM 431 Views
Good point. *NM* - 24/01/2011 01:47:29 AM 458 Views
The Pattern certainly has some plan or purpose for the Seanchan. - 23/01/2011 10:59:33 AM 965 Views
That's what's scary. In many ways, the Seanchan embody the goals of the Pattern - 23/01/2011 11:41:35 PM 802 Views
I think it's interesting - 24/01/2011 09:23:40 AM 833 Views
There has been ta'veren since Hawkwing and before the Triple. - 28/01/2011 11:56:46 AM 828 Views
Who were they? - 29/01/2011 12:33:58 AM 761 Views
Um, no - 23/01/2011 11:36:24 AM 903 Views
look around you again - 23/01/2011 03:24:01 PM 869 Views
Re: look around you again - 23/01/2011 03:54:49 PM 851 Views
Seanchan equality before the law - 23/01/2011 04:09:54 PM 910 Views
Re: Seanchan equality before the law - 23/01/2011 04:22:28 PM 867 Views
a) most of that is your own extrapolation, not shown in the text - 23/01/2011 04:56:14 PM 851 Views
Yes. - 23/01/2011 04:47:30 PM 851 Views
Mostly, yes. - 23/01/2011 05:57:17 PM 820 Views
Re: Mostly, yes. - 23/01/2011 06:10:10 PM 846 Views
Re: Mostly, yes. - 23/01/2011 06:33:00 PM 895 Views
Re: Mostly, yes. - 23/01/2011 11:03:36 PM 808 Views
Not really - 23/01/2011 07:12:27 PM 820 Views
I disagree. - 25/01/2011 07:17:18 PM 821 Views
I see them as neccessary evil to eventually eliminate channeling. - 24/01/2011 08:04:21 PM 928 Views
Lack of knowledge doesn't mean the One Power vanishes or is destroyed. - 26/01/2011 04:03:22 PM 744 Views
If OP still existed, you'd still have sparkers even "today". *NM* - 26/01/2011 06:34:50 PM 437 Views
Not exactly; genetics are more complicated. - 27/01/2011 09:48:48 PM 824 Views
No - 25/01/2011 05:41:09 PM 935 Views
Ah, um, no. - 29/01/2011 11:53:16 PM 838 Views
The thing is - 04/02/2011 05:29:15 AM 776 Views
They didn't break anything - 04/02/2011 02:13:10 PM 840 Views
Contemplate this then.... - 04/02/2011 10:29:09 PM 830 Views
Re: Contemplate this then.... - 06/02/2011 12:44:21 AM 849 Views

Reply to Message