Active Users:333 Time:07/07/2025 01:24:56 AM
Re: Wait... the indegenous Seanchan haven't changed in a thousand years? ranagrande Send a noteboard - 29/01/2011 01:10:36 PM
The very idea that a whole continent of people are all untrustworthy and dishonorable is absurd enough, but the only thing you're basing this on is the word of the conquerors of these very people. Of course they're going to claim that they were bringing enlightenment to a barbaric people. That's how most hegemonic powers have justified their expansions in history. I find it absurd that you swallow all their crap completely, and then use this to state that a whole continent is tainted.

I don't necessarily believe this either. However, there is precedent in Shara and the Aiel Waste, and presumably also the Isle of Madmen. If Ajimbura is typical of a rural Seanchan commoner, then the conquerors may be right.

Further, if the people of the Wetlands have an inherent system of justice and honor that will allow them to survive the absence of the Seanchan, what justification do they have for their invasion and their intent to export their bigotry and persecution?

Their initial justification is through military might and the threat of force. However, their hostile takeover is being legitimized through popular support, which they are gaining rapidly. The vast majority of people in the conquered countries (those not counted among the ranks of channelers, high nobility in some cases, and other dissidents) seem to prefer the peace and stability of the Seanchan regime.
Reply to message
Seanchan Takeover of Randland - 22/01/2011 11:25:36 PM 2220 Views
You mean utter anarchy and a dangerously stratified society? - 23/01/2011 07:24:48 AM 929 Views
The situation in Seanchan isn't that unique - 23/01/2011 07:49:28 AM 973 Views
Except with continous rebellion. - 23/01/2011 12:13:17 PM 967 Views
That's to be expected. - 23/01/2011 12:56:07 PM 914 Views
The anarchy is what happens in the absence of Seanchan power. - 27/01/2011 01:10:56 PM 922 Views
Yes. That is a flaw of Seanchan governance. - 28/01/2011 01:54:00 AM 834 Views
It's not the Empire's fault, and that flaw is not being duplicated in the wetlands - 28/01/2011 11:24:00 PM 1092 Views
Wait... the indegenous Seanchan haven't changed in a thousand years? - 29/01/2011 02:09:05 AM 853 Views
Re: Wait... the indegenous Seanchan haven't changed in a thousand years? - 29/01/2011 01:10:36 PM 941 Views
They treat channelers like DOGS! so, No. *NM* - 23/01/2011 07:56:22 AM 468 Views
I treat my dog better *NM* - 23/01/2011 10:28:08 AM 458 Views
Good point. *NM* - 24/01/2011 01:47:29 AM 485 Views
The Pattern certainly has some plan or purpose for the Seanchan. - 23/01/2011 10:59:33 AM 1018 Views
That's what's scary. In many ways, the Seanchan embody the goals of the Pattern - 23/01/2011 11:41:35 PM 860 Views
I think it's interesting - 24/01/2011 09:23:40 AM 897 Views
There has been ta'veren since Hawkwing and before the Triple. - 28/01/2011 11:56:46 AM 959 Views
Who were they? - 29/01/2011 12:33:58 AM 838 Views
Um, no - 23/01/2011 11:36:24 AM 959 Views
look around you again - 23/01/2011 03:24:01 PM 923 Views
Re: look around you again - 23/01/2011 03:54:49 PM 934 Views
Seanchan equality before the law - 23/01/2011 04:09:54 PM 968 Views
Re: Seanchan equality before the law - 23/01/2011 04:22:28 PM 934 Views
a) most of that is your own extrapolation, not shown in the text - 23/01/2011 04:56:14 PM 906 Views
Yes. - 23/01/2011 04:47:30 PM 902 Views
Mostly, yes. - 23/01/2011 05:57:17 PM 878 Views
Re: Mostly, yes. - 23/01/2011 06:10:10 PM 902 Views
Re: Mostly, yes. - 23/01/2011 06:33:00 PM 972 Views
Re: Mostly, yes. - 23/01/2011 11:03:36 PM 867 Views
Not really - 23/01/2011 07:12:27 PM 882 Views
I disagree. - 25/01/2011 07:17:18 PM 876 Views
I see them as neccessary evil to eventually eliminate channeling. - 24/01/2011 08:04:21 PM 989 Views
Lack of knowledge doesn't mean the One Power vanishes or is destroyed. - 26/01/2011 04:03:22 PM 812 Views
If OP still existed, you'd still have sparkers even "today". *NM* - 26/01/2011 06:34:50 PM 463 Views
Not exactly; genetics are more complicated. - 27/01/2011 09:48:48 PM 882 Views
No - 25/01/2011 05:41:09 PM 997 Views
Ah, um, no. - 29/01/2011 11:53:16 PM 900 Views
The thing is - 04/02/2011 05:29:15 AM 844 Views
They didn't break anything - 04/02/2011 02:13:10 PM 914 Views
Contemplate this then.... - 04/02/2011 10:29:09 PM 964 Views
Re: Contemplate this then.... - 06/02/2011 12:44:21 AM 909 Views

Reply to Message