Or it could be that I read every book 5 times, but like 10 years ago
newyorkersedai Send a noteboard - 26/01/2011 05:35:46 AM
My memory is pretty sharp, but remembering whether RJ used "sweated" would be a bit much. To say that the rest of my criticism (which were written very quickly and were brief, contrary to my usual style) is completely discounted because "sweated" has been used before - that's kind of missing the point of all those other words I wrote.
Just read ToM: Sanderson doesn't know High Chant, only common
23/01/2011 08:03:17 PM
- 1891 Views
As someone who's broadly anti-Sanderson
23/01/2011 08:53:52 PM
- 1315 Views
LoL - that discredits greatly the main post *NM*
24/01/2011 04:27:45 PM
- 417 Views
No, it doesn't. It "discredits greatly" one of his points, not the main argument. *NM* *NM*
24/01/2011 06:57:38 PM
- 409 Views
Disagree...
25/01/2011 12:36:25 AM
- 878 Views
Or it could be that I read every book 5 times, but like 10 years ago
26/01/2011 05:35:46 AM
- 776 Views
Huh?
23/01/2011 11:51:02 PM
- 1002 Views
No, the "misused simile" thing is just a pet peeve
24/01/2011 12:47:04 AM
- 1020 Views
Sweated is a word. *NM*
24/01/2011 02:45:57 AM
- 408 Views
Is it? Would you ever write "I had sweated" or "having sweated for an hour?" *NM*
24/01/2011 11:17:04 PM
- 389 Views
Re: Just read ToM: Sanderson doesn't know High Chant, only common
25/01/2011 11:06:24 PM
- 894 Views
I really don't want to come off as a jerk, but really? WoT has never had good writing.
26/01/2011 07:18:03 AM
- 774 Views

If you hate his writing so much then don't read the final book. *NM*
07/02/2011 03:39:43 AM
- 500 Views