Or it could be that I read every book 5 times, but like 10 years ago
newyorkersedai Send a noteboard - 26/01/2011 05:35:46 AM
My memory is pretty sharp, but remembering whether RJ used "sweated" would be a bit much. To say that the rest of my criticism (which were written very quickly and were brief, contrary to my usual style) is completely discounted because "sweated" has been used before - that's kind of missing the point of all those other words I wrote.
Just read ToM: Sanderson doesn't know High Chant, only common
23/01/2011 08:03:17 PM
- 1809 Views
As someone who's broadly anti-Sanderson
23/01/2011 08:53:52 PM
- 1235 Views
LoL - that discredits greatly the main post *NM*
24/01/2011 04:27:45 PM
- 384 Views
No, it doesn't. It "discredits greatly" one of his points, not the main argument. *NM* *NM*
24/01/2011 06:57:38 PM
- 382 Views
Disagree...
25/01/2011 12:36:25 AM
- 810 Views
Or it could be that I read every book 5 times, but like 10 years ago
26/01/2011 05:35:46 AM
- 703 Views
Huh?
23/01/2011 11:51:02 PM
- 927 Views
No, the "misused simile" thing is just a pet peeve
24/01/2011 12:47:04 AM
- 953 Views
Sweated is a word. *NM*
24/01/2011 02:45:57 AM
- 381 Views
Is it? Would you ever write "I had sweated" or "having sweated for an hour?" *NM*
24/01/2011 11:17:04 PM
- 361 Views
Re: Just read ToM: Sanderson doesn't know High Chant, only common
25/01/2011 11:06:24 PM
- 829 Views
I really don't want to come off as a jerk, but really? WoT has never had good writing.
26/01/2011 07:18:03 AM
- 696 Views
If you hate his writing so much then don't read the final book. *NM*
07/02/2011 03:39:43 AM
- 466 Views