Disagree... - Edit 1
Before modification by Nargs at 25/01/2011 12:41:08 AM
The essence of his claim is the comparison between RJ's work and BS's work and how primitive BS's work is in comparison.
The sweated "argument" that was used to prove this point shows 2 things. 1 - clearly demonstrates that New Yorker Sedai is not as familiar with the work as he claims to be since the "non-word" clearly appears many times before BS picked the series up. 2 - The "non-word" clearly is a word and drives one to question the veracity of the other observations pointed out in the post.
Suddenly, the rest of the claims in the post are scattering cockroaches in the light that was just turned on.
The sweated "argument" that was used to prove this point shows 2 things. 1 - clearly demonstrates that New Yorker Sedai is not as familiar with the work as he claims to be since the "non-word" clearly appears many times before BS picked the series up. 2 - The "non-word" clearly is a word and drives one to question the veracity of the other observations pointed out in the post.
Suddenly, the rest of the claims in the post are scattering cockroaches in the light that was just turned on.