Active Users:1140 Time:22/11/2024 07:40:58 AM
Not realty. Caemlyn is huge by the standards of the time but realistically it's tiny darius_sedai Send a noteboard - 01/01/2011 06:05:06 AM
Send a quick message to Talmanes and the Kin saying "go with location 14" and they are all set. This seems very straight forward.


Caemlyn is a big city. They would need to organise a lot of pre-determined locations to have any sort of coverage, which would be determined by how far Talmanes was prepared to lead the gholam. I would guess the he wouldn't try for more than 100 metres/yards. How many places would they need to give that sort of coverage across the city? If it is 1km across, then 100 locations. 10km, then 10,000 locations. Too many.
Domani Drag Queen in the White Tower ... Aran'gar watch out!
Reply to message
An annoying gateway error. - 24/12/2010 04:52:54 AM 2023 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. - 24/12/2010 10:23:23 AM 1239 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. - 24/12/2010 03:41:10 PM 1075 Views
I dissagree - 24/12/2010 07:09:41 PM 1047 Views
Yes, RJ confirmed that Shadowspawn can't survive gateways. *NM* - 24/12/2010 07:39:02 PM 454 Views
And then BS confirmed that gholam are "more perfected" Shadowspawn which can. *NM* - 24/12/2010 08:35:34 PM 458 Views
Read the post I responded too. I know that. - 26/12/2010 11:58:40 AM 939 Views
Why would them not being able to survive a gateway be a problem? - 26/01/2011 05:36:09 AM 773 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. - 24/12/2010 11:29:33 AM 979 Views
What he said. No error. *NM* - 24/12/2010 01:01:23 PM 435 Views
"They had not known where-or if-the gholam would attack him" - 25/12/2010 12:27:02 AM 879 Views
Re: "They had not known where-or if-the gholam would attack him" - 25/12/2010 02:05:07 AM 885 Views
They prepared a place, and it just happened to be within walking distance of the attack? - 25/12/2010 09:44:34 AM 856 Views
Please re-read the chapter. It expalins a lot. - 25/12/2010 04:05:50 PM 922 Views
Your quote shows what happened. - 26/12/2010 05:33:44 AM 834 Views
Likely picked from a handful of pre-determined locations based on where and when the attack occurred - 31/12/2010 08:47:20 PM 903 Views
Perhaps, but I don't think so. - 01/01/2011 01:19:12 AM 730 Views
Not realty. Caemlyn is huge by the standards of the time but realistically it's tiny - 01/01/2011 06:05:06 AM 772 Views
The sizes I proposed are not huge (well, they would be by standards in the middle ages but not now) - 04/01/2011 06:37:50 AM 713 Views
I believe Caemlyn is less than 300k people .... That's what .05% the size of London? - 30/01/2011 06:02:50 PM 751 Views
You aren't seriously comparing modern population densities to medieval ones, are you? *NM* - 30/01/2011 09:23:57 PM 435 Views
Of course not - 30/01/2011 09:30:47 PM 791 Views
That would be an error if it hadn't been Skimming (the platform and what not) they were using. - 25/12/2010 02:29:39 AM 816 Views
It is an error because they opened a skimming gateway to the house (from the skimming place) - 25/12/2010 09:47:08 AM 812 Views
Gateways - 25/12/2010 12:20:13 PM 808 Views
Re: Gateways - 26/12/2010 02:20:14 AM 800 Views
Re: Gateways - 26/12/2010 03:53:05 AM 739 Views
Re: Gateways - 26/12/2010 05:16:48 AM 946 Views
I'm confused now as to what you're arguing. They knew the location of the house. - 26/12/2010 08:54:17 PM 796 Views
You need to know more than just where you are going - 27/12/2010 06:59:21 AM 822 Views
Please find me a supporting quote in one of the books. - 27/12/2010 12:48:45 PM 835 Views
Re: Please find me a supporting quote in one of the books. - 27/12/2010 03:11:26 PM 737 Views
Skimming - 27/12/2010 06:24:12 PM 803 Views
Well, from Encyclopaedia WOT, and aCoS - 28/12/2010 01:02:42 AM 916 Views
Not that hard if you think about it - 30/01/2011 09:39:34 PM 866 Views
get over it - 25/12/2010 06:20:14 PM 754 Views
ok? *NM* - 26/12/2010 02:21:24 AM 462 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. - 24/12/2010 12:22:38 PM 954 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. - 24/12/2010 06:22:54 PM 734 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. - 24/12/2010 06:31:38 PM 737 Views
Very good point. Thank you for clearing that up! *NM* - 24/12/2010 09:50:47 PM 401 Views
Wrong - 24/12/2010 10:03:26 PM 912 Views
Re: Wrong - 24/12/2010 11:49:12 PM 832 Views
Re: Wrong - 25/12/2010 02:59:55 AM 804 Views
Re: Wrong - 25/12/2010 09:51:54 AM 740 Views
Re: Wrong - 27/12/2010 06:34:39 PM 833 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. - 31/12/2010 08:44:17 PM 850 Views

Reply to Message