Active Users:362 Time:27/04/2025 05:29:20 PM
Perhaps, but I don't think so. ˥ɐ ʎpu∀ɹ Send a noteboard - 01/01/2011 01:19:12 AM
Send a quick message to Talmanes and the Kin saying "go with location 14" and they are all set. This seems very straight forward.


Caemlyn is a big city. They would need to organise a lot of pre-determined locations to have any sort of coverage, which would be determined by how far Talmanes was prepared to lead the gholam. I would guess the he wouldn't try for more than 100 metres/yards. How many places would they need to give that sort of coverage across the city? If it is 1km across, then 100 locations. 10km, then 10,000 locations. Too many.
Reply to message
An annoying gateway error. - 24/12/2010 04:52:54 AM 2127 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. - 24/12/2010 10:23:23 AM 1341 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. - 24/12/2010 03:41:10 PM 1163 Views
I dissagree - 24/12/2010 07:09:41 PM 1142 Views
Yes, RJ confirmed that Shadowspawn can't survive gateways. *NM* - 24/12/2010 07:39:02 PM 498 Views
And then BS confirmed that gholam are "more perfected" Shadowspawn which can. *NM* - 24/12/2010 08:35:34 PM 498 Views
Read the post I responded too. I know that. - 26/12/2010 11:58:40 AM 1047 Views
Why would them not being able to survive a gateway be a problem? - 26/01/2011 05:36:09 AM 860 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. - 24/12/2010 11:29:33 AM 1071 Views
What he said. No error. *NM* - 24/12/2010 01:01:23 PM 466 Views
"They had not known where-or if-the gholam would attack him" - 25/12/2010 12:27:02 AM 1009 Views
Re: "They had not known where-or if-the gholam would attack him" - 25/12/2010 02:05:07 AM 974 Views
They prepared a place, and it just happened to be within walking distance of the attack? - 25/12/2010 09:44:34 AM 952 Views
Please re-read the chapter. It expalins a lot. - 25/12/2010 04:05:50 PM 1032 Views
Your quote shows what happened. - 26/12/2010 05:33:44 AM 932 Views
Likely picked from a handful of pre-determined locations based on where and when the attack occurred - 31/12/2010 08:47:20 PM 1003 Views
Perhaps, but I don't think so. - 01/01/2011 01:19:12 AM 829 Views
That would be an error if it hadn't been Skimming (the platform and what not) they were using. - 25/12/2010 02:29:39 AM 907 Views
It is an error because they opened a skimming gateway to the house (from the skimming place) - 25/12/2010 09:47:08 AM 919 Views
Gateways - 25/12/2010 12:20:13 PM 892 Views
Re: Gateways - 26/12/2010 02:20:14 AM 906 Views
Re: Gateways - 26/12/2010 03:53:05 AM 831 Views
Re: Gateways - 26/12/2010 05:16:48 AM 1048 Views
I'm confused now as to what you're arguing. They knew the location of the house. - 26/12/2010 08:54:17 PM 891 Views
You need to know more than just where you are going - 27/12/2010 06:59:21 AM 914 Views
Please find me a supporting quote in one of the books. - 27/12/2010 12:48:45 PM 925 Views
Re: Please find me a supporting quote in one of the books. - 27/12/2010 03:11:26 PM 839 Views
Skimming - 27/12/2010 06:24:12 PM 900 Views
Well, from Encyclopaedia WOT, and aCoS - 28/12/2010 01:02:42 AM 1023 Views
Not that hard if you think about it - 30/01/2011 09:39:34 PM 957 Views
get over it - 25/12/2010 06:20:14 PM 860 Views
ok? *NM* - 26/12/2010 02:21:24 AM 518 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. - 24/12/2010 12:22:38 PM 1058 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. - 24/12/2010 06:22:54 PM 826 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. - 24/12/2010 06:31:38 PM 835 Views
Very good point. Thank you for clearing that up! *NM* - 24/12/2010 09:50:47 PM 441 Views
Wrong - 24/12/2010 10:03:26 PM 1005 Views
Re: Wrong - 24/12/2010 11:49:12 PM 925 Views
Re: Wrong - 25/12/2010 02:59:55 AM 909 Views
Re: Wrong - 25/12/2010 09:51:54 AM 843 Views
Re: Wrong - 27/12/2010 06:34:39 PM 921 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. - 31/12/2010 08:44:17 PM 946 Views

Reply to Message