Active Users:2915 Time:23/01/2025 02:44:22 AM
I stand corrected. Though I will say that the uses in the books don't match the definition. Chas Send a noteboard - 28/12/2010 02:17:43 PM
Skimming
The ability to open a gateway to a dark dimension (not well defined or understood), move through that dimension, and open another gateway back into the real world in a different location. First mention is TFoH,Ch6. Anyone of sufficient strength and knowledge can Skim. Skimming requires detailed knowledge of the place one is Skimming to. Skimming was not even known as a lost Talent. (ACoS,Ch9)
-Encyclopaedia Wot - Talents

What Egwene had pried from Moghedien was a way to journey from a place you did not know well to one you did. Slower than Traveling, Skimming was not even one of the lost Telents...
-A Crown of Swords - Ch9, p186



There would be more in The Fires of Heaven when Asmo was explaining things to Rand.


e.g. Rand certainly didn't know the Caemlyn Palace courtyard enough to qualify as 'detailed knowledge' and Egwene couldn't have known the place outside Ebou Dar that she Skimmed Lan to (I don't believe that it was the same place as when she made the gateway to ED for Elayne and co.).
Reply to message
An annoying gateway error. - 24/12/2010 04:52:54 AM 2067 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. - 24/12/2010 10:23:23 AM 1278 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. - 24/12/2010 03:41:10 PM 1117 Views
I dissagree - 24/12/2010 07:09:41 PM 1093 Views
Yes, RJ confirmed that Shadowspawn can't survive gateways. *NM* - 24/12/2010 07:39:02 PM 472 Views
And then BS confirmed that gholam are "more perfected" Shadowspawn which can. *NM* - 24/12/2010 08:35:34 PM 473 Views
Read the post I responded too. I know that. - 26/12/2010 11:58:40 AM 981 Views
Why would them not being able to survive a gateway be a problem? - 26/01/2011 05:36:09 AM 809 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. - 24/12/2010 11:29:33 AM 1015 Views
What he said. No error. *NM* - 24/12/2010 01:01:23 PM 445 Views
"They had not known where-or if-the gholam would attack him" - 25/12/2010 12:27:02 AM 932 Views
Re: "They had not known where-or if-the gholam would attack him" - 25/12/2010 02:05:07 AM 923 Views
They prepared a place, and it just happened to be within walking distance of the attack? - 25/12/2010 09:44:34 AM 893 Views
Please re-read the chapter. It expalins a lot. - 25/12/2010 04:05:50 PM 969 Views
Your quote shows what happened. - 26/12/2010 05:33:44 AM 873 Views
Likely picked from a handful of pre-determined locations based on where and when the attack occurred - 31/12/2010 08:47:20 PM 947 Views
Perhaps, but I don't think so. - 01/01/2011 01:19:12 AM 776 Views
That would be an error if it hadn't been Skimming (the platform and what not) they were using. - 25/12/2010 02:29:39 AM 855 Views
It is an error because they opened a skimming gateway to the house (from the skimming place) - 25/12/2010 09:47:08 AM 851 Views
Gateways - 25/12/2010 12:20:13 PM 840 Views
Re: Gateways - 26/12/2010 02:20:14 AM 839 Views
Re: Gateways - 26/12/2010 03:53:05 AM 777 Views
Re: Gateways - 26/12/2010 05:16:48 AM 990 Views
I'm confused now as to what you're arguing. They knew the location of the house. - 26/12/2010 08:54:17 PM 835 Views
You need to know more than just where you are going - 27/12/2010 06:59:21 AM 858 Views
Please find me a supporting quote in one of the books. - 27/12/2010 12:48:45 PM 874 Views
Re: Please find me a supporting quote in one of the books. - 27/12/2010 03:11:26 PM 781 Views
Skimming - 27/12/2010 06:24:12 PM 837 Views
Well, from Encyclopaedia WOT, and aCoS - 28/12/2010 01:02:42 AM 957 Views
I stand corrected. Though I will say that the uses in the books don't match the definition. - 28/12/2010 02:17:43 PM 918 Views
Not that hard if you think about it - 30/01/2011 09:39:34 PM 903 Views
get over it - 25/12/2010 06:20:14 PM 802 Views
ok? *NM* - 26/12/2010 02:21:24 AM 479 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. - 24/12/2010 12:22:38 PM 996 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. - 24/12/2010 06:22:54 PM 772 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. - 24/12/2010 06:31:38 PM 777 Views
Very good point. Thank you for clearing that up! *NM* - 24/12/2010 09:50:47 PM 417 Views
Wrong - 24/12/2010 10:03:26 PM 948 Views
Re: Wrong - 24/12/2010 11:49:12 PM 868 Views
Re: Wrong - 25/12/2010 02:59:55 AM 850 Views
Re: Wrong - 25/12/2010 09:51:54 AM 782 Views
Re: Wrong - 27/12/2010 06:34:39 PM 868 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. - 31/12/2010 08:44:17 PM 893 Views

Reply to Message