Active Users:673 Time:23/12/2024 02:43:15 PM
Skimming Onarishma Send a noteboard - 27/12/2010 06:24:12 PM
I do not recall seeing any restriction of that kind on Skimming. You do not have to be 'very familiar' with the place you are going to - you just have to know where you want to go.


Yeah, didn't Rand skim to Illian, where he had never been before? I can't recall what method he used, and I don't have the books handy.

Also, the Kin could have skimmed either way. i.e. they could have opened the gate in the house to a place they knew, or they could have skimmed from a place they knew to the house.


Rand travelled to Illian with a regular gateway.

Neither Skimming or Traveling require you to know where you are going well.

Traveling requires you to know where you are leaving from so that you have a starting point to match the one side of the pattern to the other(whether to bore a hole or make similar)

Skimming doesn't require much of anything because you are stepping into the void(T'A'R most likely) and you don't have to decide where you are going until you are there.
Reply to message
An annoying gateway error. - 24/12/2010 04:52:54 AM 2037 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. - 24/12/2010 10:23:23 AM 1258 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. - 24/12/2010 03:41:10 PM 1092 Views
I dissagree - 24/12/2010 07:09:41 PM 1066 Views
Yes, RJ confirmed that Shadowspawn can't survive gateways. *NM* - 24/12/2010 07:39:02 PM 465 Views
And then BS confirmed that gholam are "more perfected" Shadowspawn which can. *NM* - 24/12/2010 08:35:34 PM 467 Views
Read the post I responded too. I know that. - 26/12/2010 11:58:40 AM 951 Views
Why would them not being able to survive a gateway be a problem? - 26/01/2011 05:36:09 AM 784 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. - 24/12/2010 11:29:33 AM 996 Views
What he said. No error. *NM* - 24/12/2010 01:01:23 PM 441 Views
"They had not known where-or if-the gholam would attack him" - 25/12/2010 12:27:02 AM 904 Views
Re: "They had not known where-or if-the gholam would attack him" - 25/12/2010 02:05:07 AM 898 Views
They prepared a place, and it just happened to be within walking distance of the attack? - 25/12/2010 09:44:34 AM 868 Views
Please re-read the chapter. It expalins a lot. - 25/12/2010 04:05:50 PM 937 Views
Your quote shows what happened. - 26/12/2010 05:33:44 AM 849 Views
Likely picked from a handful of pre-determined locations based on where and when the attack occurred - 31/12/2010 08:47:20 PM 921 Views
Perhaps, but I don't think so. - 01/01/2011 01:19:12 AM 747 Views
That would be an error if it hadn't been Skimming (the platform and what not) they were using. - 25/12/2010 02:29:39 AM 831 Views
It is an error because they opened a skimming gateway to the house (from the skimming place) - 25/12/2010 09:47:08 AM 825 Views
Gateways - 25/12/2010 12:20:13 PM 822 Views
Re: Gateways - 26/12/2010 02:20:14 AM 812 Views
Re: Gateways - 26/12/2010 03:53:05 AM 755 Views
Re: Gateways - 26/12/2010 05:16:48 AM 963 Views
I'm confused now as to what you're arguing. They knew the location of the house. - 26/12/2010 08:54:17 PM 809 Views
You need to know more than just where you are going - 27/12/2010 06:59:21 AM 839 Views
Please find me a supporting quote in one of the books. - 27/12/2010 12:48:45 PM 849 Views
Re: Please find me a supporting quote in one of the books. - 27/12/2010 03:11:26 PM 754 Views
Skimming - 27/12/2010 06:24:12 PM 815 Views
Well, from Encyclopaedia WOT, and aCoS - 28/12/2010 01:02:42 AM 932 Views
Not that hard if you think about it - 30/01/2011 09:39:34 PM 878 Views
get over it - 25/12/2010 06:20:14 PM 772 Views
ok? *NM* - 26/12/2010 02:21:24 AM 471 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. - 24/12/2010 12:22:38 PM 974 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. - 24/12/2010 06:22:54 PM 748 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. - 24/12/2010 06:31:38 PM 753 Views
Very good point. Thank you for clearing that up! *NM* - 24/12/2010 09:50:47 PM 407 Views
Wrong - 24/12/2010 10:03:26 PM 926 Views
Re: Wrong - 24/12/2010 11:49:12 PM 847 Views
Re: Wrong - 25/12/2010 02:59:55 AM 825 Views
Re: Wrong - 25/12/2010 09:51:54 AM 756 Views
Re: Wrong - 27/12/2010 06:34:39 PM 847 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. - 31/12/2010 08:44:17 PM 865 Views

Reply to Message