They had not known where—or if—the gholam would attack him, but Guybon had done his job well, getting everyone out of the nearby buildings, then picking a hallway that the Kinswoman would make the gateway into. He'd sent a member of the Band to tell Talmanes where to go.
So, the time line is:
* Gholam attacks
* Guybon gets everyone out of the nearby buildings
* Guybon picks a hallway for the gateway
* Talmanes is told where to lure the gholam
* Gholam is lured into the house
* A kinswoman skims from the palace into the hallway
That was actually clearer than I thought it was. Guybon only picked the spot after the gholam attacked. The kinswoman could not have known what spot he would pick before then (unless Elayne suddenly got access to Foretelling and never mentioned it), so she did not have enough time to learn the spot for skimming. Note that she couldn't have travelled to the spot either, because you still need to know your destination to be accurate about where you end up.
The only way the kinswoman could have skimmed to that spot would be to open a skimming gateway from that spot, which was exactly what she was trying to avoid by skimming from the palace in the first place!
An annoying gateway error.
- 24/12/2010 04:52:54 AM
2127 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error.
- 24/12/2010 10:23:23 AM
1341 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error.
- 24/12/2010 03:41:10 PM
1163 Views
I dissagree
- 24/12/2010 07:09:41 PM
1142 Views
Yes, RJ confirmed that Shadowspawn can't survive gateways. *NM*
- 24/12/2010 07:39:02 PM
498 Views
And then BS confirmed that gholam are "more perfected" Shadowspawn which can. 
*NM*
- 24/12/2010 08:35:34 PM
498 Views
*NM*
- 24/12/2010 08:35:34 PM
498 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error.
- 24/12/2010 11:29:33 AM
1072 Views
"They had not known where-or if-the gholam would attack him"
- 25/12/2010 12:27:02 AM
1009 Views
Re: "They had not known where-or if-the gholam would attack him"
- 25/12/2010 02:05:07 AM
975 Views
They prepared a place, and it just happened to be within walking distance of the attack?
- 25/12/2010 09:44:34 AM
953 Views
Please re-read the chapter. It expalins a lot.
- 25/12/2010 04:05:50 PM
1032 Views
Your quote shows what happened.
- 26/12/2010 05:33:44 AM
933 Views
Likely picked from a handful of pre-determined locations based on where and when the attack occurred
- 31/12/2010 08:47:20 PM
1003 Views
Perhaps, but I don't think so.
- 01/01/2011 01:19:12 AM
829 Views
Not realty. Caemlyn is huge by the standards of the time but realistically it's tiny
- 01/01/2011 06:05:06 AM
873 Views
The sizes I proposed are not huge (well, they would be by standards in the middle ages but not now)
- 04/01/2011 06:37:50 AM
803 Views
I believe Caemlyn is less than 300k people .... That's what .05% the size of London?
- 30/01/2011 06:02:50 PM
854 Views
You aren't seriously comparing modern population densities to medieval ones, are you? *NM*
- 30/01/2011 09:23:57 PM
470 Views
That would be an error if it hadn't been Skimming (the platform and what not) they were using.
- 25/12/2010 02:29:39 AM
907 Views
It is an error because they opened a skimming gateway to the house (from the skimming place)
- 25/12/2010 09:47:08 AM
920 Views
I'm confused now as to what you're arguing. They knew the location of the house.
- 26/12/2010 08:54:17 PM
891 Views
You need to know more than just where you are going
- 27/12/2010 06:59:21 AM
914 Views
Please find me a supporting quote in one of the books.
- 27/12/2010 12:48:45 PM
925 Views
Well, from Encyclopaedia WOT, and aCoS
- 28/12/2010 01:02:42 AM
1023 Views
I stand corrected. Though I will say that the uses in the books don't match the definition.
- 28/12/2010 02:17:43 PM
976 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error.
- 24/12/2010 12:22:38 PM
1058 Views