Active Users:674 Time:23/12/2024 02:57:44 PM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
It is an error because they opened a skimming gateway to the house (from the skimming place) rAndy aL Send a noteboard - 25/12/2010 09:47:08 AM
Which does not require one to know a location.


Which requires skimming to the house, which requires knowing the house. There would be no problem if they opened the gateway from the house, but they avoided that to try to stop the gholam from noticing.
Reply to message
An annoying gateway error. rAndy aL - 24/12/2010 04:52:54 AM 2038 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. Evil_Monkey - 24/12/2010 10:23:23 AM 1258 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. Lo'oris - 24/12/2010 03:41:10 PM 1092 Views
I dissagree Ashaman Narishma - 24/12/2010 07:09:41 PM 1066 Views
Yes, RJ confirmed that Shadowspawn can't survive gateways. *NM* Lord Haart - 24/12/2010 07:39:02 PM 465 Views
And then BS confirmed that gholam are "more perfected" Shadowspawn which can. *NM* moratcorlm - 24/12/2010 08:35:34 PM 467 Views
Read the post I responded too. I know that. Lord Haart - 26/12/2010 11:58:40 AM 952 Views
Why would them not being able to survive a gateway be a problem? DREWRULESWOT! - 26/01/2011 05:36:09 AM 784 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. moratcorlm - 24/12/2010 11:29:33 AM 996 Views
What he said. No error. *NM* Chas - 24/12/2010 01:01:23 PM 441 Views
"They had not known where-or if-the gholam would attack him" rAndy aL - 25/12/2010 12:27:02 AM 904 Views
Re: "They had not known where-or if-the gholam would attack him" Skeeve the Great - 25/12/2010 02:05:07 AM 898 Views
They prepared a place, and it just happened to be within walking distance of the attack? rAndy aL - 25/12/2010 09:44:34 AM 868 Views
Please re-read the chapter. It expalins a lot. Skeeve the Great - 25/12/2010 04:05:50 PM 937 Views
Your quote shows what happened. rAndy aL - 26/12/2010 05:33:44 AM 850 Views
Likely picked from a handful of pre-determined locations based on where and when the attack occurred darius_sedai - 31/12/2010 08:47:20 PM 921 Views
Perhaps, but I don't think so. ˥ɐ ʎpu∀ɹ - 01/01/2011 01:19:12 AM 747 Views
Not realty. Caemlyn is huge by the standards of the time but realistically it's tiny darius_sedai - 01/01/2011 06:05:06 AM 794 Views
The sizes I proposed are not huge (well, they would be by standards in the middle ages but not now) ˥ɐ ʎpu∀ɹ - 04/01/2011 06:37:50 AM 726 Views
I believe Caemlyn is less than 300k people .... That's what .05% the size of London? darius_sedai - 30/01/2011 06:02:50 PM 764 Views
You aren't seriously comparing modern population densities to medieval ones, are you? *NM* Ghavrel - 30/01/2011 09:23:57 PM 442 Views
Of course not darius_sedai - 30/01/2011 09:30:47 PM 807 Views
That would be an error if it hadn't been Skimming (the platform and what not) they were using. Chas - 25/12/2010 02:29:39 AM 831 Views
It is an error because they opened a skimming gateway to the house (from the skimming place) rAndy aL - 25/12/2010 09:47:08 AM 826 Views
Gateways moratcorlm - 25/12/2010 12:20:13 PM 822 Views
Re: Gateways rAndy aL - 26/12/2010 02:20:14 AM 813 Views
Re: Gateways moratcorlm - 26/12/2010 03:53:05 AM 755 Views
Re: Gateways rAndy aL - 26/12/2010 05:16:48 AM 963 Views
I'm confused now as to what you're arguing. They knew the location of the house. Chas - 26/12/2010 08:54:17 PM 809 Views
You need to know more than just where you are going rAndy aL - 27/12/2010 06:59:21 AM 839 Views
Please find me a supporting quote in one of the books. Chas - 27/12/2010 12:48:45 PM 849 Views
Re: Please find me a supporting quote in one of the books. Lord Haart - 27/12/2010 03:11:26 PM 754 Views
Skimming Onarishma - 27/12/2010 06:24:12 PM 815 Views
Well, from Encyclopaedia WOT, and aCoS rAndy aL - 28/12/2010 01:02:42 AM 933 Views
I stand corrected. Though I will say that the uses in the books don't match the definition. Chas - 28/12/2010 02:17:43 PM 889 Views
Not that hard if you think about it darius_sedai - 30/01/2011 09:39:34 PM 878 Views
get over it Japhy - 25/12/2010 06:20:14 PM 772 Views
ok? *NM* rAndy aL - 26/12/2010 02:21:24 AM 471 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. aven - 24/12/2010 12:22:38 PM 975 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. battle_shaman - 24/12/2010 06:22:54 PM 749 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. Skeeve the Great - 24/12/2010 06:31:38 PM 753 Views
Very good point. Thank you for clearing that up! *NM* Evil_Monkey - 24/12/2010 09:50:47 PM 408 Views
Wrong Cynewulf - 24/12/2010 10:03:26 PM 927 Views
Re: Wrong MightyYT - 24/12/2010 11:49:12 PM 847 Views
Re: Wrong aven - 25/12/2010 02:59:55 AM 826 Views
Re: Wrong rAndy aL - 25/12/2010 09:51:54 AM 757 Views
Re: Wrong Onarishma - 27/12/2010 06:34:39 PM 847 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. darius_sedai - 31/12/2010 08:44:17 PM 865 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes