Active Users:786 Time:03/04/2025 07:59:56 AM
They prepared a place, and it just happened to be within walking distance of the attack? rAndy aL Send a noteboard - 25/12/2010 09:44:34 AM
The problem is that the place for this ambush was no pre-planned
Um, yes it was.

They had not known where—or if—the gholam would attack him, but Guybon had done his job well, getting everyone out of the nearby buildings, then picking a hallway that the Kinswoman would make the gateway into. He'd sent a member of the Band to tell Talmanes where to go.

Er... That means that Guybon had been tracking Mat and quickly picked and prepared a place for the gateway while the attack was happening. That is not enough time to learn a place for a gateway (even holding the power). This is what I meant when I said it was not pre-planned. I mean, it's not like Guybon could have prepared an ambush in every street of the entire city, instead he managed to do it right next to where the gholam attacked.

They prepared the place where to kill gholam long before that. It was explained after the battle was over, they asked Kin to prepare gateway for that and Kin weren't happy to aid in the battle. Burning of the house though, wasn't prepared and happened by mistake.
Reply to message
An annoying gateway error. - 24/12/2010 04:52:54 AM 2121 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. - 24/12/2010 10:23:23 AM 1334 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. - 24/12/2010 03:41:10 PM 1154 Views
I dissagree - 24/12/2010 07:09:41 PM 1134 Views
Yes, RJ confirmed that Shadowspawn can't survive gateways. *NM* - 24/12/2010 07:39:02 PM 494 Views
And then BS confirmed that gholam are "more perfected" Shadowspawn which can. *NM* - 24/12/2010 08:35:34 PM 495 Views
Read the post I responded too. I know that. - 26/12/2010 11:58:40 AM 1035 Views
Why would them not being able to survive a gateway be a problem? - 26/01/2011 05:36:09 AM 850 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. - 24/12/2010 11:29:33 AM 1062 Views
What he said. No error. *NM* - 24/12/2010 01:01:23 PM 461 Views
"They had not known where-or if-the gholam would attack him" - 25/12/2010 12:27:02 AM 1000 Views
Re: "They had not known where-or if-the gholam would attack him" - 25/12/2010 02:05:07 AM 967 Views
They prepared a place, and it just happened to be within walking distance of the attack? - 25/12/2010 09:44:34 AM 943 Views
Please re-read the chapter. It expalins a lot. - 25/12/2010 04:05:50 PM 1023 Views
Your quote shows what happened. - 26/12/2010 05:33:44 AM 924 Views
Likely picked from a handful of pre-determined locations based on where and when the attack occurred - 31/12/2010 08:47:20 PM 990 Views
Perhaps, but I don't think so. - 01/01/2011 01:19:12 AM 819 Views
That would be an error if it hadn't been Skimming (the platform and what not) they were using. - 25/12/2010 02:29:39 AM 899 Views
It is an error because they opened a skimming gateway to the house (from the skimming place) - 25/12/2010 09:47:08 AM 910 Views
Gateways - 25/12/2010 12:20:13 PM 884 Views
Re: Gateways - 26/12/2010 02:20:14 AM 899 Views
Re: Gateways - 26/12/2010 03:53:05 AM 823 Views
Re: Gateways - 26/12/2010 05:16:48 AM 1041 Views
I'm confused now as to what you're arguing. They knew the location of the house. - 26/12/2010 08:54:17 PM 882 Views
You need to know more than just where you are going - 27/12/2010 06:59:21 AM 905 Views
Please find me a supporting quote in one of the books. - 27/12/2010 12:48:45 PM 916 Views
Re: Please find me a supporting quote in one of the books. - 27/12/2010 03:11:26 PM 831 Views
Skimming - 27/12/2010 06:24:12 PM 893 Views
Well, from Encyclopaedia WOT, and aCoS - 28/12/2010 01:02:42 AM 1013 Views
Not that hard if you think about it - 30/01/2011 09:39:34 PM 949 Views
get over it - 25/12/2010 06:20:14 PM 854 Views
ok? *NM* - 26/12/2010 02:21:24 AM 514 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. - 24/12/2010 12:22:38 PM 1049 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. - 24/12/2010 06:22:54 PM 817 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. - 24/12/2010 06:31:38 PM 827 Views
Very good point. Thank you for clearing that up! *NM* - 24/12/2010 09:50:47 PM 438 Views
Wrong - 24/12/2010 10:03:26 PM 994 Views
Re: Wrong - 24/12/2010 11:49:12 PM 918 Views
Re: Wrong - 25/12/2010 02:59:55 AM 902 Views
Re: Wrong - 25/12/2010 09:51:54 AM 834 Views
Re: Wrong - 27/12/2010 06:34:39 PM 914 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. - 31/12/2010 08:44:17 PM 938 Views

Reply to Message