Active Users:673 Time:23/12/2024 02:59:03 PM
"They had not known where-or if-the gholam would attack him" rAndy aL Send a noteboard - 25/12/2010 12:27:02 AM
The problem is that the place for this ambush was no pre-planned
Um, yes it was.

They had not known where—or if—the gholam would attack him, but Guybon had done his job well, getting everyone out of the nearby buildings, then picking a hallway that the Kinswoman would make the gateway into. He'd sent a member of the Band to tell Talmanes where to go.


Er... That means that Guybon had been tracking Mat and quickly picked and prepared a place for the gateway while the attack was happening. That is not enough time to learn a place for a gateway (even holding the power). This is what I meant when I said it was not pre-planned. I mean, it's not like Guybon could have prepared an ambush in every street of the entire city, instead he managed to do it right next to where the gholam attacked.
This message last edited by rAndy aL on 25/12/2010 at 12:30:08 AM
Reply to message
An annoying gateway error. - 24/12/2010 04:52:54 AM 2038 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. - 24/12/2010 10:23:23 AM 1258 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. - 24/12/2010 03:41:10 PM 1092 Views
I dissagree - 24/12/2010 07:09:41 PM 1066 Views
Yes, RJ confirmed that Shadowspawn can't survive gateways. *NM* - 24/12/2010 07:39:02 PM 465 Views
And then BS confirmed that gholam are "more perfected" Shadowspawn which can. *NM* - 24/12/2010 08:35:34 PM 467 Views
Read the post I responded too. I know that. - 26/12/2010 11:58:40 AM 952 Views
Why would them not being able to survive a gateway be a problem? - 26/01/2011 05:36:09 AM 784 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. - 24/12/2010 11:29:33 AM 996 Views
What he said. No error. *NM* - 24/12/2010 01:01:23 PM 441 Views
"They had not known where-or if-the gholam would attack him" - 25/12/2010 12:27:02 AM 905 Views
Re: "They had not known where-or if-the gholam would attack him" - 25/12/2010 02:05:07 AM 898 Views
They prepared a place, and it just happened to be within walking distance of the attack? - 25/12/2010 09:44:34 AM 868 Views
Please re-read the chapter. It expalins a lot. - 25/12/2010 04:05:50 PM 937 Views
Your quote shows what happened. - 26/12/2010 05:33:44 AM 850 Views
Likely picked from a handful of pre-determined locations based on where and when the attack occurred - 31/12/2010 08:47:20 PM 921 Views
Perhaps, but I don't think so. - 01/01/2011 01:19:12 AM 747 Views
That would be an error if it hadn't been Skimming (the platform and what not) they were using. - 25/12/2010 02:29:39 AM 831 Views
It is an error because they opened a skimming gateway to the house (from the skimming place) - 25/12/2010 09:47:08 AM 826 Views
Gateways - 25/12/2010 12:20:13 PM 822 Views
Re: Gateways - 26/12/2010 02:20:14 AM 813 Views
Re: Gateways - 26/12/2010 03:53:05 AM 755 Views
Re: Gateways - 26/12/2010 05:16:48 AM 963 Views
I'm confused now as to what you're arguing. They knew the location of the house. - 26/12/2010 08:54:17 PM 809 Views
You need to know more than just where you are going - 27/12/2010 06:59:21 AM 839 Views
Please find me a supporting quote in one of the books. - 27/12/2010 12:48:45 PM 849 Views
Re: Please find me a supporting quote in one of the books. - 27/12/2010 03:11:26 PM 754 Views
Skimming - 27/12/2010 06:24:12 PM 815 Views
Well, from Encyclopaedia WOT, and aCoS - 28/12/2010 01:02:42 AM 933 Views
Not that hard if you think about it - 30/01/2011 09:39:34 PM 878 Views
get over it - 25/12/2010 06:20:14 PM 772 Views
ok? *NM* - 26/12/2010 02:21:24 AM 471 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. - 24/12/2010 12:22:38 PM 975 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. - 24/12/2010 06:22:54 PM 749 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. - 24/12/2010 06:31:38 PM 753 Views
Very good point. Thank you for clearing that up! *NM* - 24/12/2010 09:50:47 PM 408 Views
Wrong - 24/12/2010 10:03:26 PM 927 Views
Re: Wrong - 24/12/2010 11:49:12 PM 847 Views
Re: Wrong - 25/12/2010 02:59:55 AM 826 Views
Re: Wrong - 25/12/2010 09:51:54 AM 757 Views
Re: Wrong - 27/12/2010 06:34:39 PM 847 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. - 31/12/2010 08:44:17 PM 865 Views

Reply to Message