Active Users:739 Time:03/04/2025 12:35:20 PM
Wrong Cynewulf Send a noteboard - 24/12/2010 10:03:26 PM
Gholam are not shadowspawn. They do not breed. They were constructs and as such are not affected by 'deathgates'.


The Gholam is definitely Shadowspawn. Additionally, all Shadowspawn are constructs. All constructs - except the Gholam, which apparently is a "higher level" of Shadowspawn - are affected by deathgates.
Reply to message
An annoying gateway error. - 24/12/2010 04:52:54 AM 2121 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. - 24/12/2010 10:23:23 AM 1334 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. - 24/12/2010 03:41:10 PM 1154 Views
I dissagree - 24/12/2010 07:09:41 PM 1135 Views
Yes, RJ confirmed that Shadowspawn can't survive gateways. *NM* - 24/12/2010 07:39:02 PM 495 Views
And then BS confirmed that gholam are "more perfected" Shadowspawn which can. *NM* - 24/12/2010 08:35:34 PM 495 Views
Read the post I responded too. I know that. - 26/12/2010 11:58:40 AM 1035 Views
Why would them not being able to survive a gateway be a problem? - 26/01/2011 05:36:09 AM 850 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. - 24/12/2010 11:29:33 AM 1062 Views
What he said. No error. *NM* - 24/12/2010 01:01:23 PM 461 Views
"They had not known where-or if-the gholam would attack him" - 25/12/2010 12:27:02 AM 1000 Views
Re: "They had not known where-or if-the gholam would attack him" - 25/12/2010 02:05:07 AM 968 Views
They prepared a place, and it just happened to be within walking distance of the attack? - 25/12/2010 09:44:34 AM 943 Views
Please re-read the chapter. It expalins a lot. - 25/12/2010 04:05:50 PM 1023 Views
Your quote shows what happened. - 26/12/2010 05:33:44 AM 924 Views
Likely picked from a handful of pre-determined locations based on where and when the attack occurred - 31/12/2010 08:47:20 PM 990 Views
Perhaps, but I don't think so. - 01/01/2011 01:19:12 AM 819 Views
That would be an error if it hadn't been Skimming (the platform and what not) they were using. - 25/12/2010 02:29:39 AM 899 Views
It is an error because they opened a skimming gateway to the house (from the skimming place) - 25/12/2010 09:47:08 AM 911 Views
Gateways - 25/12/2010 12:20:13 PM 884 Views
Re: Gateways - 26/12/2010 02:20:14 AM 899 Views
Re: Gateways - 26/12/2010 03:53:05 AM 824 Views
Re: Gateways - 26/12/2010 05:16:48 AM 1041 Views
I'm confused now as to what you're arguing. They knew the location of the house. - 26/12/2010 08:54:17 PM 883 Views
You need to know more than just where you are going - 27/12/2010 06:59:21 AM 905 Views
Please find me a supporting quote in one of the books. - 27/12/2010 12:48:45 PM 916 Views
Re: Please find me a supporting quote in one of the books. - 27/12/2010 03:11:26 PM 832 Views
Skimming - 27/12/2010 06:24:12 PM 894 Views
Well, from Encyclopaedia WOT, and aCoS - 28/12/2010 01:02:42 AM 1014 Views
Not that hard if you think about it - 30/01/2011 09:39:34 PM 949 Views
get over it - 25/12/2010 06:20:14 PM 854 Views
ok? *NM* - 26/12/2010 02:21:24 AM 515 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. - 24/12/2010 12:22:38 PM 1050 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. - 24/12/2010 06:22:54 PM 817 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. - 24/12/2010 06:31:38 PM 827 Views
Very good point. Thank you for clearing that up! *NM* - 24/12/2010 09:50:47 PM 439 Views
Wrong - 24/12/2010 10:03:26 PM 995 Views
Re: Wrong - 24/12/2010 11:49:12 PM 918 Views
Re: Wrong - 25/12/2010 02:59:55 AM 902 Views
Re: Wrong - 25/12/2010 09:51:54 AM 834 Views
Re: Wrong - 27/12/2010 06:34:39 PM 915 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. - 31/12/2010 08:44:17 PM 939 Views

Reply to Message