Active Users:352 Time:29/09/2024 02:55:13 AM
Nope. Lord Haart Send a noteboard - 24/12/2010 07:44:37 PM
"He has to be there, or else something bad will happen" clearly implies that Perrin's presence must be required. Rand was not at all affected by Perrin on Dragonmount. To begin with, Perrin was in T'A'R while Rand was in the real world, so that's a huge barrier.

If Perrin had actually touched Rand, or had reached out to him mentally, that would be one thing, but it seems clear that he was there as an observer so we could see something amazing happen (and so that Perrin would know to trust Rand).
Reply to message
Second time Perrin must be there for Rand vs Two times Aes Sedai may hurt him - 22/12/2010 10:29:49 PM 1768 Views
I see a stampede of Egwene apologists on the way *NM* - 23/12/2010 01:03:56 AM 424 Views
I just want to point out.. - 23/12/2010 01:18:29 AM 869 Views
Re: I just want to point out.. - 23/12/2010 06:51:05 AM 719 Views
- 28/12/2010 01:16:20 PM 571 Views
I'm still of the opinion that Rand is headed towards the same disaster LTT did - 04/01/2011 06:42:51 PM 597 Views
I think they're both partially right... - 05/01/2011 11:16:21 AM 542 Views
Er no - 23/12/2010 12:22:04 PM 777 Views
The viewing says "women who can channel" - 23/12/2010 04:13:29 PM 691 Views
The second one isn't connected. - 23/12/2010 05:16:30 PM 904 Views
nail on the head *NM* - 24/12/2010 01:27:41 AM 304 Views
Re: The second one isn't connected. - 24/12/2010 05:29:16 AM 772 Views
Re: The second one isn't connected. - 24/12/2010 11:32:59 AM 606 Views
Re: The second one isn't connected. - 24/12/2010 06:06:04 PM 616 Views
Nope. - 24/12/2010 07:44:37 PM 591 Views
Re: Nope. - 24/12/2010 08:16:25 PM 637 Views
Re: Nope. - 26/12/2010 03:22:38 PM 693 Views
I agree. - 18/01/2011 06:21:43 PM 609 Views
+1 - 19/01/2011 01:46:39 AM 631 Views

Reply to Message