Active Users:1092 Time:22/11/2024 07:53:09 AM
Re: An annoying gateway error. battle_shaman Send a noteboard - 24/12/2010 06:22:54 PM
I may be wrong on this, but I thought that the biggest problem with the gholam going through the gateway is that the gholam acts like Mat's medallion and stops the weaves. In this case, it shouldn't be able to go through any kind of gateway but rather destroy the weave for the gateway upon touching it.
Reply to message
An annoying gateway error. - 24/12/2010 04:52:54 AM 2023 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. - 24/12/2010 10:23:23 AM 1239 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. - 24/12/2010 03:41:10 PM 1076 Views
I dissagree - 24/12/2010 07:09:41 PM 1047 Views
Yes, RJ confirmed that Shadowspawn can't survive gateways. *NM* - 24/12/2010 07:39:02 PM 454 Views
And then BS confirmed that gholam are "more perfected" Shadowspawn which can. *NM* - 24/12/2010 08:35:34 PM 459 Views
Read the post I responded too. I know that. - 26/12/2010 11:58:40 AM 939 Views
Why would them not being able to survive a gateway be a problem? - 26/01/2011 05:36:09 AM 774 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. - 24/12/2010 11:29:33 AM 980 Views
What he said. No error. *NM* - 24/12/2010 01:01:23 PM 435 Views
"They had not known where-or if-the gholam would attack him" - 25/12/2010 12:27:02 AM 879 Views
Re: "They had not known where-or if-the gholam would attack him" - 25/12/2010 02:05:07 AM 886 Views
They prepared a place, and it just happened to be within walking distance of the attack? - 25/12/2010 09:44:34 AM 857 Views
Please re-read the chapter. It expalins a lot. - 25/12/2010 04:05:50 PM 922 Views
Your quote shows what happened. - 26/12/2010 05:33:44 AM 834 Views
Likely picked from a handful of pre-determined locations based on where and when the attack occurred - 31/12/2010 08:47:20 PM 903 Views
Perhaps, but I don't think so. - 01/01/2011 01:19:12 AM 730 Views
That would be an error if it hadn't been Skimming (the platform and what not) they were using. - 25/12/2010 02:29:39 AM 816 Views
It is an error because they opened a skimming gateway to the house (from the skimming place) - 25/12/2010 09:47:08 AM 812 Views
Gateways - 25/12/2010 12:20:13 PM 808 Views
Re: Gateways - 26/12/2010 02:20:14 AM 801 Views
Re: Gateways - 26/12/2010 03:53:05 AM 739 Views
Re: Gateways - 26/12/2010 05:16:48 AM 946 Views
I'm confused now as to what you're arguing. They knew the location of the house. - 26/12/2010 08:54:17 PM 796 Views
You need to know more than just where you are going - 27/12/2010 06:59:21 AM 822 Views
Please find me a supporting quote in one of the books. - 27/12/2010 12:48:45 PM 835 Views
Re: Please find me a supporting quote in one of the books. - 27/12/2010 03:11:26 PM 738 Views
Skimming - 27/12/2010 06:24:12 PM 803 Views
Well, from Encyclopaedia WOT, and aCoS - 28/12/2010 01:02:42 AM 916 Views
Not that hard if you think about it - 30/01/2011 09:39:34 PM 866 Views
get over it - 25/12/2010 06:20:14 PM 754 Views
ok? *NM* - 26/12/2010 02:21:24 AM 463 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. - 24/12/2010 12:22:38 PM 954 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. - 24/12/2010 06:22:54 PM 735 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. - 24/12/2010 06:31:38 PM 738 Views
Very good point. Thank you for clearing that up! *NM* - 24/12/2010 09:50:47 PM 401 Views
Wrong - 24/12/2010 10:03:26 PM 912 Views
Re: Wrong - 24/12/2010 11:49:12 PM 834 Views
Re: Wrong - 25/12/2010 02:59:55 AM 804 Views
Re: Wrong - 25/12/2010 09:51:54 AM 740 Views
Re: Wrong - 27/12/2010 06:34:39 PM 833 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. - 31/12/2010 08:44:17 PM 850 Views

Reply to Message