Err... another one.
Mat and Elayne's plan to kill the gholam relied on forcing it through a gateway. Ignoring the question of whether it should be able to survive a gateway or not, there is still a hole in the plan to make the gateway in the first place.
They hoped that the gholam would not notice the gateway if it was opened from "the other side" (in this case, the skimming place). The problem is that the place for this ambush was no pre-planned, so there is no way that one of the Aes Sedai or Kin could have Skimmed to that place.
The plan is broken, but not irrevocably so. All attempts of hiding the gateway by opening it from the other side would have to be abandoned (not that it did any good anyway). Hell, the gholam would probably charge right through a gateway if it saw an Aes Sedai trying to escape through it.
Mat and Elayne's plan to kill the gholam relied on forcing it through a gateway. Ignoring the question of whether it should be able to survive a gateway or not, there is still a hole in the plan to make the gateway in the first place.
They hoped that the gholam would not notice the gateway if it was opened from "the other side" (in this case, the skimming place). The problem is that the place for this ambush was no pre-planned, so there is no way that one of the Aes Sedai or Kin could have Skimmed to that place.
The plan is broken, but not irrevocably so. All attempts of hiding the gateway by opening it from the other side would have to be abandoned (not that it did any good anyway). Hell, the gholam would probably charge right through a gateway if it saw an Aes Sedai trying to escape through it.
An annoying gateway error.
- 24/12/2010 04:52:54 AM
2038 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error.
- 24/12/2010 10:23:23 AM
1258 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error.
- 24/12/2010 03:41:10 PM
1092 Views
I dissagree
- 24/12/2010 07:09:41 PM
1066 Views
Yes, RJ confirmed that Shadowspawn can't survive gateways. *NM*
- 24/12/2010 07:39:02 PM
465 Views
And then BS confirmed that gholam are "more perfected" Shadowspawn which can. 
*NM*
- 24/12/2010 08:35:34 PM
467 Views
*NM*
- 24/12/2010 08:35:34 PM
467 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error.
- 24/12/2010 11:29:33 AM
996 Views
"They had not known where-or if-the gholam would attack him"
- 25/12/2010 12:27:02 AM
904 Views
Re: "They had not known where-or if-the gholam would attack him"
- 25/12/2010 02:05:07 AM
898 Views
They prepared a place, and it just happened to be within walking distance of the attack?
- 25/12/2010 09:44:34 AM
868 Views
Please re-read the chapter. It expalins a lot.
- 25/12/2010 04:05:50 PM
937 Views
Your quote shows what happened.
- 26/12/2010 05:33:44 AM
850 Views
Likely picked from a handful of pre-determined locations based on where and when the attack occurred
- 31/12/2010 08:47:20 PM
921 Views
Perhaps, but I don't think so.
- 01/01/2011 01:19:12 AM
747 Views
Not realty. Caemlyn is huge by the standards of the time but realistically it's tiny
- 01/01/2011 06:05:06 AM
794 Views
The sizes I proposed are not huge (well, they would be by standards in the middle ages but not now)
- 04/01/2011 06:37:50 AM
726 Views
I believe Caemlyn is less than 300k people .... That's what .05% the size of London?
- 30/01/2011 06:02:50 PM
764 Views
You aren't seriously comparing modern population densities to medieval ones, are you? *NM*
- 30/01/2011 09:23:57 PM
442 Views
That would be an error if it hadn't been Skimming (the platform and what not) they were using.
- 25/12/2010 02:29:39 AM
831 Views
It is an error because they opened a skimming gateway to the house (from the skimming place)
- 25/12/2010 09:47:08 AM
825 Views
I'm confused now as to what you're arguing. They knew the location of the house.
- 26/12/2010 08:54:17 PM
809 Views
You need to know more than just where you are going
- 27/12/2010 06:59:21 AM
839 Views
Please find me a supporting quote in one of the books.
- 27/12/2010 12:48:45 PM
849 Views
Well, from Encyclopaedia WOT, and aCoS
- 28/12/2010 01:02:42 AM
932 Views
I stand corrected. Though I will say that the uses in the books don't match the definition.
- 28/12/2010 02:17:43 PM
889 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error.
- 24/12/2010 12:22:38 PM
974 Views