Active Users:374 Time:11/03/2025 06:50:03 PM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
go read the boooks more closely darius_sedai Send a noteboard - 05/12/2010 02:34:11 PM
You were saying that it should have been impossible for her to show the Seanchan the gateway.

"The oath against using the OP as a weapon should have prevented Elaida or any captive Aes Sedai from showing the Seanchan Travelling."


Yeah, it COULD have been an Accepted who saw the Travelling weave. It didnt HAVE to be Elaida (or any Aes Sedai) who knew the weave was going to cause death.

Explain the actions of Perrin's Aes Sedai in ToM. The weave Perrin asked them to do was NOT going to cause any direct deaths, yet they refused saying they could not help.


Of course it had to be Elaida! In the Tower she held all of the "new weaves" very closely. Showing only Tarna and commanding her not to share. That means only Elaida, Alviarin and Beonin were the only Tower women who knew the weave to teach the Seanchan in the first place, and let's face it having Elaida end up being the damane to teach the Empire Traveling is more interesting than Beonin!

Some random Accepted or Novice from the Tower would never have seen the weave much less have been able to easily replicate it for the Seanchan, just like Shalon the Wind Finder couldn't reproduce it just by seeing a completed one ... she would have needed someone to show her how to make the weave itself.
Domani Drag Queen in the White Tower ... Aran'gar watch out!
This message last edited by darius_sedai on 05/12/2010 at 02:35:18 PM
Reply to message
Elaida, oh no you didn't! malekithe - 04/12/2010 06:38:22 AM 2021 Views
The weave will not directly result in death Helene - 04/12/2010 06:54:20 AM 924 Views
Re: The weave will not directly result in death malekithe - 04/12/2010 07:08:50 AM 842 Views
Wrong for two reasons Voscaia Sedai - 04/12/2010 09:10:03 AM 999 Views
Only two? Usually he's wrong for eight reasons. *NM* Deadsy - 04/12/2010 09:47:37 AM 449 Views
Go jump in a lake malekithe - 05/12/2010 08:32:18 AM 726 Views
I wanted to be polite and mentioned just the major ones *NM* Voscaia Sedai - 05/12/2010 10:44:25 AM 408 Views
Thank you, Voscaia Sedai *NM* Evil_Monkey - 04/12/2010 08:51:58 PM 354 Views
Re: Wrong for two reasons malekithe - 05/12/2010 08:39:02 AM 746 Views
you're forgetting she was collared. LadyLorraine - 05/12/2010 09:01:27 AM 632 Views
Re: you're forgetting she was collared. malekithe - 05/12/2010 09:08:30 AM 726 Views
uhm, no that's not all you're saying. LadyLorraine - 05/12/2010 09:14:47 AM 732 Views
Yeah I am malekithe - 05/12/2010 09:17:48 AM 664 Views
no. dude i gave you a direct quote from your own statement. that is not what you said LadyLorraine - 05/12/2010 09:20:14 AM 792 Views
Go dude yourself brother. malekithe - 05/12/2010 09:27:33 AM 655 Views
wow i just...wow. LadyLorraine - 05/12/2010 09:33:41 AM 753 Views
Re: wow i just...wow. malekithe - 05/12/2010 09:45:47 AM 726 Views
yes well you genuinely seem to be having a problem comprehending your own statements. LadyLorraine - 05/12/2010 09:51:18 AM 607 Views
Well you genuinely seem to be retarded. malekithe - 05/12/2010 09:59:19 AM 661 Views
I judge this based off your own reactions to other's statements LadyLorraine - 05/12/2010 10:05:58 AM 770 Views
I judge you based on your own statements towards me malekithe - 05/12/2010 10:16:18 AM 688 Views
if all you did was disagree with me, we would not be having this discussion. LadyLorraine - 05/12/2010 10:25:36 AM 606 Views
This is why I replied the way I did *NM* Deadsy - 05/12/2010 10:51:54 AM 317 Views
go read the boooks more closely darius_sedai - 05/12/2010 02:34:11 PM 1030 Views
Plain wrong. The weave doesn't kill in itself. Ashaman_Luc - 04/12/2010 02:34:00 PM 820 Views
Wrong malekithe - 05/12/2010 08:40:40 AM 654 Views
This redqueen - 04/12/2010 12:35:04 PM 686 Views
Seconded "This"^ *NM* LadyLorraine - 04/12/2010 07:09:17 PM 315 Views
Thirded "This"^ *NM* Voscaia Sedai - 05/12/2010 10:47:56 AM 364 Views
Re: Fourthed "This"^ *NM* alanna aes sedai - 05/12/2010 08:08:15 PM 321 Views
yep, he was just trolling I guess *NM* Lo'oris - 05/12/2010 01:58:32 PM 318 Views
the oath is very literal and does not forbid indirectly causing death Ava - 04/12/2010 02:55:13 PM 659 Views
Re: the oath is very literal and does not forbid indirectly causing death malekithe - 05/12/2010 08:43:48 AM 722 Views
just because they didn't want to doesn't mean they weren't able. LadyLorraine - 05/12/2010 09:07:08 AM 692 Views
Re: just because they didn't want to doesn't mean they weren't able. malekithe - 05/12/2010 09:11:28 AM 710 Views
well that would explain how santa is able to make his rounds in one night! *NM* LadyLorraine - 05/12/2010 09:13:42 AM 323 Views
well that would explain how santa is able to make his rounds in one night! *NM* LadyLorraine - 05/12/2010 09:13:43 AM 262 Views
Yup, I guess that was what Elaida was thinking *NM* malekithe - 05/12/2010 09:15:21 AM 323 Views
Re: the oath is very literal and does not forbid indirectly causing death HyogaRott - 06/12/2010 03:44:33 PM 651 Views
It's actually come up in the books themselves darius_sedai - 04/12/2010 03:00:03 PM 802 Views
Re: Elaida, oh no you didn't! Zeratul - 04/12/2010 03:30:57 PM 713 Views
Elaida could teach them balefire and not break the Oaths. *NM* Gher - 04/12/2010 07:24:55 PM 307 Views
This is ridiculous. You can teach any weave, including Balefire. You just can't always use it. *NM* Marshall - 05/12/2010 06:37:16 AM 281 Views
You can teach a weave so long as YOU believe that the weave won't be a weapon. Elaida knows better *NM* malekithe - 05/12/2010 09:13:57 AM 328 Views
This is false, we've seen battle weaves taught since the start of the series. Lord Haart - 05/12/2010 01:49:13 PM 626 Views
Right? and every AS seems to know how to make a fireball and call lightning darius_sedai - 05/12/2010 02:44:45 PM 621 Views
that's where you are wrong darius_sedai - 05/12/2010 02:43:21 PM 632 Views
Re: Elaida, oh no you didn't! benxtaron - 05/12/2010 08:32:50 AM 806 Views
There's another way she could have avoided it redqueen - 05/12/2010 11:37:09 AM 628 Views
Re: There's another way she could have avoided it Lord Haart - 05/12/2010 01:51:06 PM 1006 Views
Re: There's another way she could have avoided it Watcher - 06/12/2010 01:43:45 PM 631 Views
I disagree redqueen - 06/12/2010 02:29:46 PM 686 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes