Active Users:1104 Time:22/11/2024 11:51:24 PM
I judge you based on your own statements towards me malekithe Send a noteboard - 05/12/2010 10:16:18 AM
Helene argued with your statement that she should not have been able to show them the weave, due to the oath about weapons. You argued this point for a short while.

Then suddenly, you were claiming "uhm, but I said that we didn't have to see Elaida or an Aes Sedai do it."

well, yes, you did, but that has no bearing on the argument being made. It's a red herring. It has nothing to do with whether she or any other Aes Sedai was able to do so. This is a matter of world magic mechanics, where as the point that we didn't need to see them do it is a matter of plot development mechanics. Your point that it was probably just so we saw what happened to Elaida is quite valid and likely. It just has nothing to do with whether she was able to show them how to make a gateway.

So either you merely do not know how to argue, or you do not have the ability to comprehend what you read.



No what I said in essence was that it strained incredulity to see Elaida do it when in my opinion that her Oath should have constrained her. She still believes she is the Amyrlin, she knows that the Seanchan will likely kill Aes Sedai by her teaching them this weave, therefore she should believe the weave is a weapon in her hands.

Therefore I stated something to the effect of 'why did it have to be Elaida to show this weave', when it would have crossed no boundaries for someone like an Accepted to do it, when they have no Oath, no possible even shred of reason that would not allow them to perform it. An Aes Sedai, ESPECIALLY Elaida who still thinks she is Amyrlin should not (in my opinion it felt sketchy, and used solely for the purpose of showing Elaida and disregarded the Oath completely).

Now, go ahead and curse at me all you like, and masquerade your insults by saying things like I have a 'reading disability' because I don't agree with you.

The point is I just disagree with you, it's you that decided to lower yourself and attack me personally.
Reply to message
Elaida, oh no you didn't! - 04/12/2010 06:38:22 AM 1956 Views
The weave will not directly result in death - 04/12/2010 06:54:20 AM 875 Views
Re: The weave will not directly result in death - 04/12/2010 07:08:50 AM 786 Views
Wrong for two reasons - 04/12/2010 09:10:03 AM 945 Views
Only two? Usually he's wrong for eight reasons. *NM* - 04/12/2010 09:47:37 AM 426 Views
Go jump in a lake - 05/12/2010 08:32:18 AM 670 Views
I wanted to be polite and mentioned just the major ones *NM* - 05/12/2010 10:44:25 AM 386 Views
Thank you, Voscaia Sedai *NM* - 04/12/2010 08:51:58 PM 335 Views
Re: Wrong for two reasons - 05/12/2010 08:39:02 AM 690 Views
you're forgetting she was collared. - 05/12/2010 09:01:27 AM 578 Views
Re: you're forgetting she was collared. - 05/12/2010 09:08:30 AM 667 Views
uhm, no that's not all you're saying. - 05/12/2010 09:14:47 AM 667 Views
Yeah I am - 05/12/2010 09:17:48 AM 600 Views
no. dude i gave you a direct quote from your own statement. that is not what you said - 05/12/2010 09:20:14 AM 737 Views
Go dude yourself brother. - 05/12/2010 09:27:33 AM 597 Views
wow i just...wow. - 05/12/2010 09:33:41 AM 687 Views
Re: wow i just...wow. - 05/12/2010 09:45:47 AM 672 Views
yes well you genuinely seem to be having a problem comprehending your own statements. - 05/12/2010 09:51:18 AM 555 Views
Well you genuinely seem to be retarded. - 05/12/2010 09:59:19 AM 602 Views
I judge this based off your own reactions to other's statements - 05/12/2010 10:05:58 AM 703 Views
I judge you based on your own statements towards me - 05/12/2010 10:16:18 AM 631 Views
if all you did was disagree with me, we would not be having this discussion. - 05/12/2010 10:25:36 AM 544 Views
This is why I replied the way I did *NM* - 05/12/2010 10:51:54 AM 299 Views
go read the boooks more closely - 05/12/2010 02:34:11 PM 970 Views
Plain wrong. The weave doesn't kill in itself. - 04/12/2010 02:34:00 PM 769 Views
Wrong - 05/12/2010 08:40:40 AM 598 Views
This - 04/12/2010 12:35:04 PM 620 Views
Seconded "This"^ *NM* - 04/12/2010 07:09:17 PM 287 Views
Thirded "This"^ *NM* - 05/12/2010 10:47:56 AM 340 Views
Re: Fourthed "This"^ *NM* - 05/12/2010 08:08:15 PM 295 Views
yep, he was just trolling I guess *NM* - 05/12/2010 01:58:32 PM 294 Views
the oath is very literal and does not forbid indirectly causing death - 04/12/2010 02:55:13 PM 607 Views
Re: the oath is very literal and does not forbid indirectly causing death - 05/12/2010 08:43:48 AM 690 Views
just because they didn't want to doesn't mean they weren't able. - 05/12/2010 09:07:08 AM 637 Views
Re: just because they didn't want to doesn't mean they weren't able. - 05/12/2010 09:11:28 AM 646 Views
well that would explain how santa is able to make his rounds in one night! *NM* - 05/12/2010 09:13:43 AM 248 Views
Yup, I guess that was what Elaida was thinking *NM* - 05/12/2010 09:15:21 AM 302 Views
It's actually come up in the books themselves - 04/12/2010 03:00:03 PM 747 Views
Re: Elaida, oh no you didn't! - 04/12/2010 03:30:57 PM 648 Views
Elaida could teach them balefire and not break the Oaths. *NM* - 04/12/2010 07:24:55 PM 285 Views
Re: Elaida, oh no you didn't! - 05/12/2010 08:32:50 AM 778 Views
There's another way she could have avoided it - 05/12/2010 11:37:09 AM 599 Views
Re: There's another way she could have avoided it - 05/12/2010 01:51:06 PM 951 Views
Re: There's another way she could have avoided it - 06/12/2010 01:43:45 PM 583 Views
I disagree - 06/12/2010 02:29:46 PM 621 Views

Reply to Message