Yes, that is what you said at the end of your post.
but you said "The oath against using the OP as a weapon should have prevented Elaida or any captive Aes Sedai from showing the Seanchan Travelling."
I don't disagree with you that we probably didn't have to have Elaida be the one to do it. We didn't. But your first statements are what is under discussion, not the other ones. The fact that you said that an Aes Sedai should not have been able to show Travelling to the Seanchan is what this sub thread is about.
NO ONE has argued that "Oh we DEFINITELY had to see an Aes Sedai do it, PARTICULARLY Elaida!!"
this statement. this one right here: "The oath against using the OP as a weapon should have prevented Elaida or any captive Aes Sedai from showing the Seanchan Travelling. " is the one that people are arguing with you about.
And you know what, I may have called into question your reading comprehension ability but that's only because you are not showing any. I never stooped to name calling so if you're going to go there, then that certainly says a lot about you, doesn't it?
but you said "The oath against using the OP as a weapon should have prevented Elaida or any captive Aes Sedai from showing the Seanchan Travelling."
I don't disagree with you that we probably didn't have to have Elaida be the one to do it. We didn't. But your first statements are what is under discussion, not the other ones. The fact that you said that an Aes Sedai should not have been able to show Travelling to the Seanchan is what this sub thread is about.
NO ONE has argued that "Oh we DEFINITELY had to see an Aes Sedai do it, PARTICULARLY Elaida!!"
this statement. this one right here: "The oath against using the OP as a weapon should have prevented Elaida or any captive Aes Sedai from showing the Seanchan Travelling. " is the one that people are arguing with you about.
And you know what, I may have called into question your reading comprehension ability but that's only because you are not showing any. I never stooped to name calling so if you're going to go there, then that certainly says a lot about you, doesn't it?
Still Empress of the Poofy Purple Pillow Pile Palace!!
Continued Love of my Aussie <3
Continued Love of my Aussie <3
Elaida, oh no you didn't!
- 04/12/2010 06:38:22 AM
1920 Views
The weave will not directly result in death
- 04/12/2010 06:54:20 AM
837 Views
Re: The weave will not directly result in death
- 04/12/2010 07:08:50 AM
753 Views
Wrong for two reasons
- 04/12/2010 09:10:03 AM
906 Views
Re: Wrong for two reasons
- 05/12/2010 08:39:02 AM
659 Views
you're forgetting she was collared.
- 05/12/2010 09:01:27 AM
544 Views
Re: you're forgetting she was collared.
- 05/12/2010 09:08:30 AM
633 Views
uhm, no that's not all you're saying.
- 05/12/2010 09:14:47 AM
636 Views
Yeah I am
- 05/12/2010 09:17:48 AM
567 Views
no. dude i gave you a direct quote from your own statement. that is not what you said
- 05/12/2010 09:20:14 AM
702 Views
Go dude yourself brother.
- 05/12/2010 09:27:33 AM
562 Views
wow i just...wow.
- 05/12/2010 09:33:41 AM
650 Views
Re: wow i just...wow.
- 05/12/2010 09:45:47 AM
644 Views
yes well you genuinely seem to be having a problem comprehending your own statements.
- 05/12/2010 09:51:18 AM
518 Views
Well you genuinely seem to be retarded.
- 05/12/2010 09:59:19 AM
561 Views
I judge this based off your own reactions to other's statements
- 05/12/2010 10:05:58 AM
660 Views
I judge you based on your own statements towards me
- 05/12/2010 10:16:18 AM
597 Views
if all you did was disagree with me, we would not be having this discussion.
- 05/12/2010 10:25:36 AM
496 Views
*NM*
Seconded "This"^ *NM*
- 04/12/2010 07:09:17 PM
265 Views
the oath is very literal and does not forbid indirectly causing death
- 04/12/2010 02:55:13 PM
581 Views
Re: the oath is very literal and does not forbid indirectly causing death
- 05/12/2010 08:43:48 AM
663 Views
just because they didn't want to doesn't mean they weren't able.
- 05/12/2010 09:07:08 AM
608 Views
Re: just because they didn't want to doesn't mean they weren't able.
- 05/12/2010 09:11:28 AM
614 Views
well that would explain how santa is able to make his rounds in one night! *NM*
- 05/12/2010 09:13:42 AM
285 Views
well that would explain how santa is able to make his rounds in one night! *NM*
- 05/12/2010 09:13:43 AM
236 Views
*NM*
Re: the oath is very literal and does not forbid indirectly causing death
- 06/12/2010 03:44:33 PM
558 Views
This is ridiculous. You can teach any weave, including Balefire. You just can't always use it. *NM*
- 05/12/2010 06:37:16 AM
243 Views
You can teach a weave so long as YOU believe that the weave won't be a weapon. Elaida knows better *NM*
- 05/12/2010 09:13:57 AM
286 Views
This is false, we've seen battle weaves taught since the start of the series.
- 05/12/2010 01:49:13 PM
535 Views
Right? and every AS seems to know how to make a fireball and call lightning
- 05/12/2010 02:44:45 PM
526 Views
There's another way she could have avoided it
- 05/12/2010 11:37:09 AM
564 Views
Re: There's another way she could have avoided it
- 05/12/2010 01:51:06 PM
912 Views