your opening statement was, again "The oath against using the OP as a weapon should have prevented Elaida or any captive Aes Sedai from showing the Seanchan Travelling."
If what you meant was "oh why did it have to be Elaida" that is not what that statement means.
It means you think that she should not have been able to do so.
Do you have some sort of reading comprehension disability??
Maybe you have a reading disability bitch.
"It just shouldnt have been an Aes Sedai to do it."
Not an Aes Sedai, meaning not Elaida - an Aes Sedai.
Don't flame me because you disagree, I will gladly flame you back. Just disagree.
Elaida, oh no you didn't!
04/12/2010 06:38:22 AM
- 1920 Views
The weave will not directly result in death
04/12/2010 06:54:20 AM
- 837 Views
Re: The weave will not directly result in death
04/12/2010 07:08:50 AM
- 753 Views
Wrong for two reasons
04/12/2010 09:10:03 AM
- 906 Views
Re: Wrong for two reasons
05/12/2010 08:39:02 AM
- 659 Views
you're forgetting she was collared.
05/12/2010 09:01:27 AM
- 544 Views
Re: you're forgetting she was collared.
05/12/2010 09:08:30 AM
- 633 Views
uhm, no that's not all you're saying.
05/12/2010 09:14:47 AM
- 636 Views
Yeah I am
05/12/2010 09:17:48 AM
- 567 Views
no. dude i gave you a direct quote from your own statement. that is not what you said
05/12/2010 09:20:14 AM
- 701 Views
Go dude yourself brother.
05/12/2010 09:27:33 AM
- 562 Views
wow i just...wow.
05/12/2010 09:33:41 AM
- 649 Views
Re: wow i just...wow.
05/12/2010 09:45:47 AM
- 644 Views
yes well you genuinely seem to be having a problem comprehending your own statements.
05/12/2010 09:51:18 AM
- 518 Views
Well you genuinely seem to be retarded.
05/12/2010 09:59:19 AM
- 560 Views
I judge this based off your own reactions to other's statements
05/12/2010 10:05:58 AM
- 660 Views
I judge you based on your own statements towards me
05/12/2010 10:16:18 AM
- 597 Views
if all you did was disagree with me, we would not be having this discussion.
05/12/2010 10:25:36 AM
- 495 Views
Seconded "This"^ *NM*
04/12/2010 07:09:17 PM
- 265 Views
the oath is very literal and does not forbid indirectly causing death
04/12/2010 02:55:13 PM
- 581 Views
Re: the oath is very literal and does not forbid indirectly causing death
05/12/2010 08:43:48 AM
- 663 Views
just because they didn't want to doesn't mean they weren't able.
05/12/2010 09:07:08 AM
- 608 Views
Re: just because they didn't want to doesn't mean they weren't able.
05/12/2010 09:11:28 AM
- 614 Views
well that would explain how santa is able to make his rounds in one night! *NM*
05/12/2010 09:13:42 AM
- 285 Views
well that would explain how santa is able to make his rounds in one night! *NM*
05/12/2010 09:13:43 AM
- 236 Views
Re: the oath is very literal and does not forbid indirectly causing death
06/12/2010 03:44:33 PM
- 558 Views
This is ridiculous. You can teach any weave, including Balefire. You just can't always use it. *NM*
05/12/2010 06:37:16 AM
- 242 Views
You can teach a weave so long as YOU believe that the weave won't be a weapon. Elaida knows better *NM*
05/12/2010 09:13:57 AM
- 286 Views
This is false, we've seen battle weaves taught since the start of the series.
05/12/2010 01:49:13 PM
- 535 Views
Right? and every AS seems to know how to make a fireball and call lightning
05/12/2010 02:44:45 PM
- 525 Views
There's another way she could have avoided it
05/12/2010 11:37:09 AM
- 564 Views
Re: There's another way she could have avoided it
05/12/2010 01:51:06 PM
- 912 Views