Active Users:501 Time:06/07/2024 04:45:52 AM
Re: the oath is very literal and does not forbid indirectly causing death malekithe Send a noteboard - 05/12/2010 08:43:48 AM
The three oaths are, "To speak no word that is not true, to make no weapon for one man to kill another, and never to use the One Power as a weapon, except against Shadowspawn, to save her own life or her Warder's, or the life of another sister."

The oaths are quite literal; a gateway is not a weapon, therefore she can form one just fine. The oath does not forbid indirectly causing death with the power. Even tying a person up with the power to then kill them with steel weapons has not been forbidden by the oath.

Not to mention we've already seen how little integrity most Aes Sedai have when it comes to finding ways to weasel out of their oaths. The first one is the easiest to get around, but the second and third are nearly as weak.


Elaida wouldnt want to get around this Oath, she doesnt want to have the Tower destroyed and collared. And as far as the weave having to DIRECTLY kill, this is untrue. Witness the Aes Sedai following Perrin who refused to even slightly help him against the Whitecloaks because of any possibility that their help could somehow result, even indirectly with their deaths.
Reply to message
Elaida, oh no you didn't! - 04/12/2010 06:38:22 AM 1919 Views
The weave will not directly result in death - 04/12/2010 06:54:20 AM 837 Views
Re: The weave will not directly result in death - 04/12/2010 07:08:50 AM 753 Views
Wrong for two reasons - 04/12/2010 09:10:03 AM 906 Views
Only two? Usually he's wrong for eight reasons. *NM* - 04/12/2010 09:47:37 AM 409 Views
Go jump in a lake - 05/12/2010 08:32:18 AM 639 Views
I wanted to be polite and mentioned just the major ones *NM* - 05/12/2010 10:44:25 AM 368 Views
Thank you, Voscaia Sedai *NM* - 04/12/2010 08:51:58 PM 310 Views
Re: Wrong for two reasons - 05/12/2010 08:39:02 AM 659 Views
you're forgetting she was collared. - 05/12/2010 09:01:27 AM 544 Views
Re: you're forgetting she was collared. - 05/12/2010 09:08:30 AM 633 Views
uhm, no that's not all you're saying. - 05/12/2010 09:14:47 AM 636 Views
Yeah I am - 05/12/2010 09:17:48 AM 566 Views
no. dude i gave you a direct quote from your own statement. that is not what you said - 05/12/2010 09:20:14 AM 701 Views
Go dude yourself brother. - 05/12/2010 09:27:33 AM 561 Views
wow i just...wow. - 05/12/2010 09:33:41 AM 649 Views
Re: wow i just...wow. - 05/12/2010 09:45:47 AM 644 Views
yes well you genuinely seem to be having a problem comprehending your own statements. - 05/12/2010 09:51:18 AM 518 Views
Well you genuinely seem to be retarded. - 05/12/2010 09:59:19 AM 560 Views
I judge this based off your own reactions to other's statements - 05/12/2010 10:05:58 AM 660 Views
I judge you based on your own statements towards me - 05/12/2010 10:16:18 AM 597 Views
if all you did was disagree with me, we would not be having this discussion. - 05/12/2010 10:25:36 AM 495 Views
This is why I replied the way I did *NM* - 05/12/2010 10:51:54 AM 281 Views
go read the boooks more closely - 05/12/2010 02:34:11 PM 932 Views
Plain wrong. The weave doesn't kill in itself. - 04/12/2010 02:34:00 PM 736 Views
Wrong - 05/12/2010 08:40:40 AM 565 Views
This - 04/12/2010 12:35:04 PM 587 Views
Seconded "This"^ *NM* - 04/12/2010 07:09:17 PM 264 Views
Thirded "This"^ *NM* - 05/12/2010 10:47:56 AM 324 Views
Re: Fourthed "This"^ *NM* - 05/12/2010 08:08:15 PM 279 Views
yep, he was just trolling I guess *NM* - 05/12/2010 01:58:32 PM 277 Views
the oath is very literal and does not forbid indirectly causing death - 04/12/2010 02:55:13 PM 581 Views
Re: the oath is very literal and does not forbid indirectly causing death - 05/12/2010 08:43:48 AM 663 Views
just because they didn't want to doesn't mean they weren't able. - 05/12/2010 09:07:08 AM 608 Views
Re: just because they didn't want to doesn't mean they weren't able. - 05/12/2010 09:11:28 AM 614 Views
well that would explain how santa is able to make his rounds in one night! *NM* - 05/12/2010 09:13:43 AM 236 Views
Yup, I guess that was what Elaida was thinking *NM* - 05/12/2010 09:15:21 AM 287 Views
It's actually come up in the books themselves - 04/12/2010 03:00:03 PM 712 Views
Re: Elaida, oh no you didn't! - 04/12/2010 03:30:57 PM 612 Views
Elaida could teach them balefire and not break the Oaths. *NM* - 04/12/2010 07:24:55 PM 264 Views
Re: Elaida, oh no you didn't! - 05/12/2010 08:32:50 AM 721 Views
There's another way she could have avoided it - 05/12/2010 11:37:09 AM 564 Views
Re: There's another way she could have avoided it - 05/12/2010 01:51:06 PM 912 Views
Re: There's another way she could have avoided it - 06/12/2010 01:43:45 PM 544 Views
I disagree - 06/12/2010 02:29:46 PM 586 Views

Reply to Message