Active Users:408 Time:04/04/2025 12:05:28 PM
This doesn't make a lot of sense guttering flame Send a noteboard - 03/12/2010 06:37:02 AM
We know that if you die while dreaming yourself in Teleranriod your body will die as well no matter how weakly you are in teleranriod.

For your interpretation to make sense we would have to assume that a 2/3 soul that remain in your body can function without the dead 1/3 soul that died in TAR. But soul can't be divided into parts and its center would be where the awareness was which was the part dying. Hence the rest would die as well as the body's death should show us.

Actually I don't think a soul is divided when you divide your attention is divided between your body and the dream. I'd guess your whole soul flickers back and forth between body and dream so when something happens to you in the dreamworld it happens to all of you.
Reply to message
Egwene and the WIse Ones don't know the most basic thing about Teleranriod - 02/12/2010 10:43:16 PM 2024 Views
IIRC Nicola was killed by a Black Ajah Sister and Egwene had tried to save her. - 02/12/2010 10:52:01 PM 1218 Views
Yes, I meant allowing her near the battle in the first place - 03/12/2010 06:28:45 AM 826 Views
And who would enforce those rules? - 03/12/2010 12:42:33 PM 955 Views
Also, I'm not sure how you could expect the Wise Ones to know that. - 03/12/2010 02:51:43 PM 832 Views
How do you figure? - 02/12/2010 10:55:15 PM 1028 Views
Re: How do you figure? - 02/12/2010 11:06:29 PM 1112 Views
may, being the operative word. - 02/12/2010 11:12:49 PM 943 Views
except for the part of the soul that stays in the sleeping body, like they've explained many times. *NM* - 02/12/2010 11:16:43 PM 442 Views
mmm fair point. maybe if you were there "too strongly"? - 02/12/2010 11:18:50 PM 938 Views
right. but i dont think 'too strongly' ever means completely. maybe in the flesh or something *NM* - 03/12/2010 01:24:38 AM 471 Views
This doesn't make a lot of sense - 03/12/2010 06:37:02 AM 882 Views
They also told Perrin that about... - 03/12/2010 12:55:57 AM 1028 Views
yes, that is another confounding factor - 03/12/2010 09:14:35 AM 886 Views
Oh, I see. - 02/12/2010 11:45:37 PM 992 Views
Re: Oh, I see. - 03/12/2010 02:29:30 AM 992 Views
Re: Oh, I see. - 03/12/2010 02:45:59 AM 921 Views
He isn't a wolfbrother - 03/12/2010 05:43:06 AM 962 Views
Maybe he hadn't discovered it yet. - 03/12/2010 06:21:22 AM 860 Views
He'd be a shadowbrother-brother - 03/12/2010 06:51:59 AM 801 Views
You raise an interesting possibility - 03/12/2010 06:44:18 AM 1052 Views
Wolfbrothers are going to be part of the next age. - 03/12/2010 07:05:30 AM 817 Views
I thought they were just a transitional thing - 03/12/2010 07:13:17 AM 907 Views
I doubt it, that Age is ours. - 03/12/2010 09:33:03 PM 808 Views
Uhm, TOTALLY. - 03/12/2010 10:00:01 PM 778 Views
GASP! *NM* - 04/12/2010 06:59:09 AM 516 Views
I know RJ said something - 04/12/2010 06:15:51 AM 793 Views
Re: I know RJ said something - 04/12/2010 07:05:50 AM 882 Views
So... - 04/12/2010 07:24:07 AM 900 Views
Re: So... - 04/12/2010 10:12:45 AM 860 Views
Of course... - 05/12/2010 08:21:05 PM 955 Views
If the first age is the Technological / Scientific Age - 06/12/2010 06:33:18 AM 920 Views
I don't see why they would have to be unique themes. - 06/12/2010 07:04:08 AM 861 Views
I don't even know why they're supposed to be mutually exclusive. *NM* - 06/12/2010 07:37:35 AM 441 Views
Re: I don't see why they would have to be unique themes. - 06/12/2010 08:14:15 AM 841 Views
uhm, duh, stonehedge. - 04/12/2010 07:11:44 PM 811 Views
That's far from "the most basic" thing and it is entirely excusable that they do not know it. - 02/12/2010 11:17:46 PM 1000 Views
It could be extrapolated from the fact that it's souls that inhabit it - 03/12/2010 06:54:40 AM 864 Views
You're caving to bias from being outside the story with more information than any single character. - 03/12/2010 09:13:12 AM 880 Views
Don't forget the Heroes - 03/12/2010 09:34:43 AM 763 Views
I think that she meant that comment as more for the "hero" version - 03/12/2010 10:57:38 AM 830 Views
Maybe this should be a question for Sanderson? - 03/12/2010 11:43:54 AM 837 Views
that's only because you're stubbornly holding to yours, despite everyone indicating its errors *NM* - 03/12/2010 05:29:15 PM 509 Views
Obviously my tenacity indicates that I have a worthy point - 03/12/2010 07:06:18 PM 654 Views
Perrin doesn't count since his information is from Hopper - 03/12/2010 09:58:01 PM 854 Views
So it's my evidence against your non-evidence? - 04/12/2010 06:05:41 AM 917 Views
why are you assuming that all souls are the same? - 04/12/2010 07:18:10 PM 1121 Views
1. You're wrong. 2. Even if you're right, how would they know? - 03/12/2010 05:28:33 AM 1070 Views
Maybe, but I bet they can spell it. - 03/12/2010 05:43:28 AM 912 Views
Incidentally, wouldn't that mean it is safer to go to Tel'aran'rhiod in the flesh? *NM* - 03/12/2010 09:35:21 PM 432 Views
I'm more inclined to believe that being killed in the flesh in TAR - 04/12/2010 07:35:15 PM 771 Views
Where does that reasoning begin? - 04/12/2010 07:53:42 PM 1343 Views
Perhaps it's more of a matter that the "usual route" may be altered? - 04/12/2010 10:20:51 PM 748 Views
But human souls don't go to Tel'aran'rhiod, from what we know. - 04/12/2010 11:19:53 PM 767 Views
maybe it does? - 05/12/2010 12:18:05 AM 1101 Views
So do we have any reason to believe this is the case? *NM* - 05/12/2010 02:48:48 AM 423 Views
I don't think so. It's not really something that's discussed - 05/12/2010 03:19:37 AM 632 Views
I'm pondering too - 05/12/2010 03:04:10 PM 929 Views
Not @ all - if humans regularly go to TAR after they die, we'd have seen it already. Heroes would - 04/12/2010 01:28:45 AM 953 Views
that would have been decidedly clever. *NM* - 04/12/2010 07:18:52 PM 385 Views

Reply to Message