Active Users:336 Time:09/04/2025 12:38:25 PM
1. You're wrong. 2. Even if you're right, how would they know? beetnemesis Send a noteboard - 03/12/2010 05:28:33 AM
The wolf dream has special rules, and the way Perrin interacts with the dream is not how Egwene or other dreamwalkers do.

Perrin seems to be able to modulate how strongly he's in the dream. Hopper is constantly chiding him for being there too strongly. Egwene doesn't seem to have this issue.


But fine, say you're right, and anyone who dies in the world of dreams is dead forever. How would anyone know? No one can talk to the dead in WoT. Reincarnations are thousands of years apart, and even if they aren't, you have no idea who is reincarnated as who (with one obvious exception, of course (which still kinda bugs me, how did the Breaking Aes Sedai make that Dragon-only ward?))
I amuse myself.
Reply to message
Egwene and the WIse Ones don't know the most basic thing about Teleranriod - 02/12/2010 10:43:16 PM 2026 Views
IIRC Nicola was killed by a Black Ajah Sister and Egwene had tried to save her. - 02/12/2010 10:52:01 PM 1221 Views
Yes, I meant allowing her near the battle in the first place - 03/12/2010 06:28:45 AM 827 Views
And who would enforce those rules? - 03/12/2010 12:42:33 PM 957 Views
Also, I'm not sure how you could expect the Wise Ones to know that. - 03/12/2010 02:51:43 PM 835 Views
How do you figure? - 02/12/2010 10:55:15 PM 1028 Views
Re: How do you figure? - 02/12/2010 11:06:29 PM 1114 Views
may, being the operative word. - 02/12/2010 11:12:49 PM 944 Views
except for the part of the soul that stays in the sleeping body, like they've explained many times. *NM* - 02/12/2010 11:16:43 PM 443 Views
mmm fair point. maybe if you were there "too strongly"? - 02/12/2010 11:18:50 PM 939 Views
right. but i dont think 'too strongly' ever means completely. maybe in the flesh or something *NM* - 03/12/2010 01:24:38 AM 471 Views
This doesn't make a lot of sense - 03/12/2010 06:37:02 AM 882 Views
They also told Perrin that about... - 03/12/2010 12:55:57 AM 1030 Views
yes, that is another confounding factor - 03/12/2010 09:14:35 AM 888 Views
Oh, I see. - 02/12/2010 11:45:37 PM 994 Views
Re: Oh, I see. - 03/12/2010 02:29:30 AM 994 Views
Re: Oh, I see. - 03/12/2010 02:45:59 AM 923 Views
He isn't a wolfbrother - 03/12/2010 05:43:06 AM 963 Views
Maybe he hadn't discovered it yet. - 03/12/2010 06:21:22 AM 861 Views
He'd be a shadowbrother-brother - 03/12/2010 06:51:59 AM 803 Views
You raise an interesting possibility - 03/12/2010 06:44:18 AM 1056 Views
Wolfbrothers are going to be part of the next age. - 03/12/2010 07:05:30 AM 820 Views
I thought they were just a transitional thing - 03/12/2010 07:13:17 AM 908 Views
I doubt it, that Age is ours. - 03/12/2010 09:33:03 PM 811 Views
Uhm, TOTALLY. - 03/12/2010 10:00:01 PM 778 Views
GASP! *NM* - 04/12/2010 06:59:09 AM 517 Views
I know RJ said something - 04/12/2010 06:15:51 AM 793 Views
Re: I know RJ said something - 04/12/2010 07:05:50 AM 885 Views
So... - 04/12/2010 07:24:07 AM 901 Views
Re: So... - 04/12/2010 10:12:45 AM 863 Views
Of course... - 05/12/2010 08:21:05 PM 956 Views
If the first age is the Technological / Scientific Age - 06/12/2010 06:33:18 AM 923 Views
I don't see why they would have to be unique themes. - 06/12/2010 07:04:08 AM 862 Views
I don't even know why they're supposed to be mutually exclusive. *NM* - 06/12/2010 07:37:35 AM 442 Views
Re: I don't see why they would have to be unique themes. - 06/12/2010 08:14:15 AM 845 Views
uhm, duh, stonehedge. - 04/12/2010 07:11:44 PM 814 Views
That's far from "the most basic" thing and it is entirely excusable that they do not know it. - 02/12/2010 11:17:46 PM 1003 Views
It could be extrapolated from the fact that it's souls that inhabit it - 03/12/2010 06:54:40 AM 868 Views
You're caving to bias from being outside the story with more information than any single character. - 03/12/2010 09:13:12 AM 882 Views
Don't forget the Heroes - 03/12/2010 09:34:43 AM 765 Views
I think that she meant that comment as more for the "hero" version - 03/12/2010 10:57:38 AM 831 Views
Maybe this should be a question for Sanderson? - 03/12/2010 11:43:54 AM 841 Views
that's only because you're stubbornly holding to yours, despite everyone indicating its errors *NM* - 03/12/2010 05:29:15 PM 509 Views
Obviously my tenacity indicates that I have a worthy point - 03/12/2010 07:06:18 PM 657 Views
Perrin doesn't count since his information is from Hopper - 03/12/2010 09:58:01 PM 855 Views
So it's my evidence against your non-evidence? - 04/12/2010 06:05:41 AM 919 Views
why are you assuming that all souls are the same? - 04/12/2010 07:18:10 PM 1123 Views
1. You're wrong. 2. Even if you're right, how would they know? - 03/12/2010 05:28:33 AM 1071 Views
Maybe, but I bet they can spell it. - 03/12/2010 05:43:28 AM 912 Views
Incidentally, wouldn't that mean it is safer to go to Tel'aran'rhiod in the flesh? *NM* - 03/12/2010 09:35:21 PM 432 Views
I'm more inclined to believe that being killed in the flesh in TAR - 04/12/2010 07:35:15 PM 773 Views
Where does that reasoning begin? - 04/12/2010 07:53:42 PM 1345 Views
Perhaps it's more of a matter that the "usual route" may be altered? - 04/12/2010 10:20:51 PM 753 Views
But human souls don't go to Tel'aran'rhiod, from what we know. - 04/12/2010 11:19:53 PM 770 Views
maybe it does? - 05/12/2010 12:18:05 AM 1103 Views
So do we have any reason to believe this is the case? *NM* - 05/12/2010 02:48:48 AM 424 Views
I don't think so. It's not really something that's discussed - 05/12/2010 03:19:37 AM 633 Views
I'm pondering too - 05/12/2010 03:04:10 PM 932 Views
Not @ all - if humans regularly go to TAR after they die, we'd have seen it already. Heroes would - 04/12/2010 01:28:45 AM 956 Views
that would have been decidedly clever. *NM* - 04/12/2010 07:18:52 PM 386 Views

Reply to Message