Re: That's far from "the most basic" thing and it is entirely excusable that they do not know it.
DomA Send a noteboard - 03/12/2010 02:42:39 AM
How, exactly, would you expect them to discover this? Most incarnations of the same person aren't aware of who they were in a previous life, so the Wise Ones have no way of going "You know, X was killed in T'A'R', but we haven't had any record of them being respun in GENERATIONS!!"
Why does Perrin know?
The wolves told him. And the wolves seem to have a much stronger and integral link to T'A'R' than humans do. We can't even be sure that this applies to human souls as well. Probably the only human individuals aware of whether or not this occurs would be the Heroes of the Horn when they are not presently spun out. So the only character who is able to answer this question for us is Birgitte, and she may not know either.
If this was common knowledge and the Wise Ones just didn't know, it'd be a "most basic" thing. But they don't know and they have no real ability to find out, so it's far from a basic piece of knowledge.
Why does Perrin know?
The wolves told him. And the wolves seem to have a much stronger and integral link to T'A'R' than humans do. We can't even be sure that this applies to human souls as well. Probably the only human individuals aware of whether or not this occurs would be the Heroes of the Horn when they are not presently spun out. So the only character who is able to answer this question for us is Birgitte, and she may not know either.
If this was common knowledge and the Wise Ones just didn't know, it'd be a "most basic" thing. But they don't know and they have no real ability to find out, so it's far from a basic piece of knowledge.
We can't even be 100% sure the wolves got it right about themselves. They know when the soul of a wolf die in TAR, this wolf soul is never reborn as a wolf. They've not considered the possibility that to be reborn as a wolf, a soul needs to live an afterlife as a wolf in TAR. It could be that if a soul lost the connection to the wolves by dying in the afterlife, it isn't destroyed, but it goes back to the general "soul pool", to be reborn as something else. We don't know much about transpecies rebirth, but RJ indirectly implied it happens, when talking of where the Nym got their souls, or that the souls borrowed by Shadowspawn from the soul pool are tainted, and they cannot be reborn as anything else but Shadowspawn after.
It could even be that the soul of a wolf that die in TAR, when reborn as a human, becomes a wolfbrother, and that in turn Perrin and Elyas when they die will join the wolves in TAR (like Noam, who became Boundless) and be reborn as wolves next... until in some Age they get killed in TAR and their cycle of rebirths as wolves end.
The Pattern is a world without a beginning nor end. An ending is just a new beginning, in RJ's conception of things. It's fairly curious that something as "natural" as a wolf meeting death in TAR gets a real "a final end". It sounds like a big flaw in the working of the pattern that such a thing as a real final end might happen to any soul.
Egwene and the WIse Ones don't know the most basic thing about Teleranriod
02/12/2010 10:43:16 PM
- 2024 Views
IIRC Nicola was killed by a Black Ajah Sister and Egwene had tried to save her.
02/12/2010 10:52:01 PM
- 1218 Views
Yes, I meant allowing her near the battle in the first place
03/12/2010 06:28:45 AM
- 826 Views
And who would enforce those rules?
03/12/2010 12:42:33 PM
- 955 Views
Also, I'm not sure how you could expect the Wise Ones to know that.
03/12/2010 02:51:43 PM
- 832 Views
How do you figure?
02/12/2010 10:55:15 PM
- 1027 Views
Re: How do you figure?
02/12/2010 11:06:29 PM
- 1112 Views
may, being the operative word.
02/12/2010 11:12:49 PM
- 943 Views
except for the part of the soul that stays in the sleeping body, like they've explained many times. *NM*
02/12/2010 11:16:43 PM
- 442 Views
mmm fair point. maybe if you were there "too strongly"?
02/12/2010 11:18:50 PM
- 938 Views
right. but i dont think 'too strongly' ever means completely. maybe in the flesh or something
*NM*
03/12/2010 01:24:38 AM
- 470 Views

Oh, I see.
02/12/2010 11:45:37 PM
- 992 Views
Re: Oh, I see.
03/12/2010 02:29:30 AM
- 992 Views
Re: Oh, I see.
03/12/2010 02:45:59 AM
- 921 Views
He isn't a wolfbrother
03/12/2010 05:43:06 AM
- 962 Views
You raise an interesting possibility
03/12/2010 06:44:18 AM
- 1051 Views
Wolfbrothers are going to be part of the next age.
03/12/2010 07:05:30 AM
- 817 Views
I thought they were just a transitional thing
03/12/2010 07:13:17 AM
- 907 Views
I doubt it, that Age is ours.
03/12/2010 09:33:03 PM
- 808 Views
I know RJ said something
04/12/2010 06:15:51 AM
- 792 Views
Re: I know RJ said something
04/12/2010 07:05:50 AM
- 882 Views
So...
04/12/2010 07:24:07 AM
- 900 Views
Re: So...
04/12/2010 10:12:45 AM
- 860 Views
Of course...
05/12/2010 08:21:05 PM
- 955 Views
If the first age is the Technological / Scientific Age
06/12/2010 06:33:18 AM
- 920 Views
I don't see why they would have to be unique themes.
06/12/2010 07:04:08 AM
- 860 Views
I don't even know why they're supposed to be mutually exclusive. *NM*
06/12/2010 07:37:35 AM
- 441 Views
No, because Heroes and Wolves are both different from run of the mill humans
03/12/2010 09:19:05 AM
- 927 Views
That's far from "the most basic" thing and it is entirely excusable that they do not know it.
02/12/2010 11:17:46 PM
- 1000 Views
Re: That's far from "the most basic" thing and it is entirely excusable that they do not know it.
03/12/2010 02:42:39 AM
- 946 Views
It could be extrapolated from the fact that it's souls that inhabit it
03/12/2010 06:54:40 AM
- 864 Views
You're caving to bias from being outside the story with more information than any single character.
03/12/2010 09:13:12 AM
- 880 Views
Don't forget the Heroes
03/12/2010 09:34:43 AM
- 763 Views
I think that she meant that comment as more for the "hero" version
03/12/2010 10:57:38 AM
- 829 Views
Maybe this should be a question for Sanderson?
03/12/2010 11:43:54 AM
- 837 Views
that's only because you're stubbornly holding to yours, despite everyone indicating its errors
*NM*
03/12/2010 05:29:15 PM
- 509 Views

Obviously my tenacity indicates that I have a worthy point
03/12/2010 07:06:18 PM
- 654 Views
Perrin doesn't count since his information is from Hopper
03/12/2010 09:58:01 PM
- 854 Views
Incidentally, wouldn't that mean it is safer to go to Tel'aran'rhiod in the flesh? *NM*
03/12/2010 09:35:21 PM
- 432 Views
I'm more inclined to believe that being killed in the flesh in TAR
04/12/2010 07:35:15 PM
- 771 Views
Where does that reasoning begin?
04/12/2010 07:53:42 PM
- 1342 Views
Perhaps it's more of a matter that the "usual route" may be altered?
04/12/2010 10:20:51 PM
- 748 Views
But human souls don't go to Tel'aran'rhiod, from what we know.
04/12/2010 11:19:53 PM
- 767 Views
maybe it does?
05/12/2010 12:18:05 AM
- 1101 Views
So do we have any reason to believe this is the case? *NM*
05/12/2010 02:48:48 AM
- 423 Views
Not @ all - if humans regularly go to TAR after they die, we'd have seen it already. Heroes would
04/12/2010 01:28:45 AM
- 953 Views