All right, that would be reasonable. But Wolf souls die for good in the Dreamworld because that's where dead wolves go. Aside from Heroes of the Horn, dead humans don't go to the Dreamworld, do they?
RJ said there's an afterworld where souls go to await rebirth. If it's TAR for humans too, it's not in the same dimension of TAR.
Hopper had no idea where humans go.
My hunch is that wolfbrothers become wolves in TAR after they die however, so perhaps Hopper's warning is true enough for Perrin. It may also be true if you die in TAR while there in the flesh. Perhaps your soul then becomes "lost", unable to reach the "soul pool".
Hopper may be quite wrong too, even about the wolves. Perhaps the wolves that die in TAR simply stop being reincarnated as wolves to rejoin the soul pool, and that's why the wolves believe these souls have died the final death (perhaps the souls of those wolves that died in TAR when they are reborn as human become wolfbrothers?). As RJ pointed out, souls are immortal - not even balefire can destroy them. It's very curious that dying in TAR while not incarnated (or even when incarnated) would destroy your soul. I suspect only Shai'tan can destroy souls.
Depending if Rand literally "dies" or not, I guess we might learn more about the afterlife in the last book.
Egwene and the WIse Ones don't know the most basic thing about Teleranriod
02/12/2010 10:43:16 PM
- 1958 Views
IIRC Nicola was killed by a Black Ajah Sister and Egwene had tried to save her.
02/12/2010 10:52:01 PM
- 1158 Views
Yes, I meant allowing her near the battle in the first place
03/12/2010 06:28:45 AM
- 763 Views
And who would enforce those rules?
03/12/2010 12:42:33 PM
- 880 Views
Also, I'm not sure how you could expect the Wise Ones to know that.
03/12/2010 02:51:43 PM
- 754 Views
How do you figure?
02/12/2010 10:55:15 PM
- 962 Views
Re: How do you figure?
02/12/2010 11:06:29 PM
- 1051 Views
may, being the operative word.
02/12/2010 11:12:49 PM
- 874 Views
except for the part of the soul that stays in the sleeping body, like they've explained many times. *NM*
02/12/2010 11:16:43 PM
- 419 Views
mmm fair point. maybe if you were there "too strongly"?
02/12/2010 11:18:50 PM
- 879 Views
right. but i dont think 'too strongly' ever means completely. maybe in the flesh or something *NM*
03/12/2010 01:24:38 AM
- 445 Views
Oh, I see.
02/12/2010 11:45:37 PM
- 922 Views
Re: Oh, I see.
03/12/2010 02:29:30 AM
- 929 Views
Re: Oh, I see.
03/12/2010 02:45:59 AM
- 856 Views
He isn't a wolfbrother
03/12/2010 05:43:06 AM
- 893 Views
You raise an interesting possibility
03/12/2010 06:44:18 AM
- 993 Views
Wolfbrothers are going to be part of the next age.
03/12/2010 07:05:30 AM
- 753 Views
I thought they were just a transitional thing
03/12/2010 07:13:17 AM
- 839 Views
I doubt it, that Age is ours.
03/12/2010 09:33:03 PM
- 753 Views
I know RJ said something
04/12/2010 06:15:51 AM
- 728 Views
Re: I know RJ said something
04/12/2010 07:05:50 AM
- 811 Views
So...
04/12/2010 07:24:07 AM
- 835 Views
Re: So...
04/12/2010 10:12:45 AM
- 794 Views
Of course...
05/12/2010 08:21:05 PM
- 885 Views
If the first age is the Technological / Scientific Age
06/12/2010 06:33:18 AM
- 861 Views
I don't see why they would have to be unique themes.
06/12/2010 07:04:08 AM
- 793 Views
I don't even know why they're supposed to be mutually exclusive. *NM*
06/12/2010 07:37:35 AM
- 416 Views
No, because Heroes and Wolves are both different from run of the mill humans
03/12/2010 09:19:05 AM
- 860 Views
That's far from "the most basic" thing and it is entirely excusable that they do not know it.
02/12/2010 11:17:46 PM
- 923 Views
Re: That's far from "the most basic" thing and it is entirely excusable that they do not know it.
03/12/2010 02:42:39 AM
- 871 Views
It could be extrapolated from the fact that it's souls that inhabit it
03/12/2010 06:54:40 AM
- 801 Views
You're caving to bias from being outside the story with more information than any single character.
03/12/2010 09:13:12 AM
- 818 Views
Don't forget the Heroes
03/12/2010 09:34:43 AM
- 702 Views
I think that she meant that comment as more for the "hero" version
03/12/2010 10:57:38 AM
- 758 Views
Maybe this should be a question for Sanderson?
03/12/2010 11:43:54 AM
- 772 Views
that's only because you're stubbornly holding to yours, despite everyone indicating its errors *NM*
03/12/2010 05:29:15 PM
- 488 Views
Obviously my tenacity indicates that I have a worthy point
03/12/2010 07:06:18 PM
- 587 Views
Perrin doesn't count since his information is from Hopper
03/12/2010 09:58:01 PM
- 788 Views
Incidentally, wouldn't that mean it is safer to go to Tel'aran'rhiod in the flesh? *NM*
03/12/2010 09:35:21 PM
- 417 Views
I'm more inclined to believe that being killed in the flesh in TAR
04/12/2010 07:35:15 PM
- 703 Views
Where does that reasoning begin?
04/12/2010 07:53:42 PM
- 1268 Views
Perhaps it's more of a matter that the "usual route" may be altered?
04/12/2010 10:20:51 PM
- 682 Views
But human souls don't go to Tel'aran'rhiod, from what we know.
04/12/2010 11:19:53 PM
- 702 Views
maybe it does?
05/12/2010 12:18:05 AM
- 1032 Views
So do we have any reason to believe this is the case? *NM*
05/12/2010 02:48:48 AM
- 401 Views
Not @ all - if humans regularly go to TAR after they die, we'd have seen it already. Heroes would
04/12/2010 01:28:45 AM
- 879 Views