Active Users:1147 Time:22/11/2024 07:49:47 PM
Re: No mistake. It's a figure of an acrobat bent backwards with "his" hands bound to "his" feet. malekithe Send a noteboard - 02/12/2010 11:07:50 PM
There were a lot of angreal carved into the figurine of a woman so I understand if you were mixed up.

-Moiraine's ivory woman statue
-Ivory carving of a seated woman covered in own hair
-Stone figurine of a naked woman covered with own hair.
etc


I knew it was an acrobat, but I thought it was at first a woman (when Lanfear and Moiraine fought) and now a man when Moiraine was rescued?
Reply to message
Moiraine's angreal - 02/12/2010 07:36:24 PM 1478 Views
No mistake. It's a figure of an acrobat bent backwards with "his" hands bound to "his" feet. - 02/12/2010 08:05:45 PM 897 Views
Re: No mistake. It's a figure of an acrobat bent backwards with "his" hands bound to "his" feet. - 02/12/2010 11:07:50 PM 797 Views
Page 893 of TFoH. Hope that clears things up. *NM* - 03/12/2010 03:12:17 AM 692 Views
Jack @$$ *NM* - 03/12/2010 04:07:40 AM 311 Views
heehee *NM* - 03/12/2010 04:13:28 AM 301 Views
Messed up - 03/12/2010 05:48:28 AM 737 Views
Re: heehee - 03/12/2010 05:48:36 AM 655 Views
Re: heehee - 03/12/2010 02:02:33 PM 580 Views
Re: heehee - 03/12/2010 02:31:55 PM 644 Views
could be a transvestite *NM* - 03/12/2010 05:56:23 AM 305 Views
here's the quote for you - 05/12/2010 04:19:22 PM 702 Views
Re: Moiraine's angreal - 04/12/2010 09:10:10 PM 791 Views
I always assumed it was an angreal made by someone on team evil - 04/12/2010 09:49:37 PM 675 Views
maybe what happened to her was her Price? - 05/12/2010 09:40:26 AM 648 Views
I don't think so from her statements later - 05/12/2010 03:19:02 PM 661 Views
No, I don't mean that she knew that would happen. - 05/12/2010 05:55:35 PM 775 Views
Re: Strenght of the two angreal. - 06/12/2010 01:33:21 PM 660 Views
Ahhh. see my first impression was that they were different as well.. - 06/12/2010 02:05:33 PM 628 Views
Well that's obviously Brandon butchered the book... </sarcasm> *NM* - 06/12/2010 05:36:44 PM 314 Views

Reply to Message