Active Users:1118 Time:22/11/2024 02:10:38 PM
Re: I agree. Also, chopping up the timelines was the best decision given the circumstances. Lo'oris Send a noteboard - 01/12/2010 02:31:46 PM
I can't wait to get the last one, and a few years ago you would never have heard me saying that.


And that was exactly what he said he wanted to do ^^
(just nitpicking)
--
Io iudico bene questo: che sia meglio essere impetuoso che respettivo, perché la fortuna è donna ed è necessario, volendola tenere sotto, batterla e urtarla.
Reply to message
/tGS: These are damned good books. - 27/11/2010 02:22:05 AM 1392 Views
OK. *NM* - 27/11/2010 02:35:06 AM 296 Views
meh. ToM sucked for me. after tGS, I had become a bit hopeful, but now I see ... - 27/11/2010 03:39:49 AM 763 Views
You keep trying to make that nickname stick... - 27/11/2010 08:47:52 PM 759 Views
yeah!!..... - 27/11/2010 08:55:37 PM 681 Views
meh. - 27/11/2010 09:31:30 PM 629 Views
Yeah, they are - 27/11/2010 06:03:59 AM 693 Views
Disagree strongly on the time line issue - TOM showed what a mistake splitting by 'clusters' was IMO - 27/11/2010 07:24:55 AM 729 Views
Re: Disagree strongly on the time line issue - TOM showed what a mistake splitting by 'clusters' was - 27/11/2010 05:59:47 PM 629 Views
I agree with this as well. - 27/11/2010 06:31:37 PM 739 Views
Splitting it this way was the only realistic choice - 29/11/2010 01:58:52 PM 595 Views
Disagree - plus COT lacked almost anything full stop - 30/11/2010 12:03:24 AM 770 Views
Re: Disagree - plus COT lacked almost anything full stop - 30/11/2010 12:18:57 AM 633 Views
It will be better than CoT, sure, but still not good enough to appease most fans - 30/11/2010 06:20:38 PM 765 Views
In any case you can see why RJ wanted one book - 01/12/2010 01:41:56 AM 633 Views
BS style - 27/11/2010 07:25:38 AM 821 Views
That's the thing! If it was in its normal, Jordan paced writing, ... - 27/11/2010 08:52:05 AM 683 Views
Re: That's the thing! If it was in its normal, Jordan paced writing, ... - 27/11/2010 11:57:22 PM 669 Views
And you know how RJ would've outlined the books from where? - 28/11/2010 05:07:31 AM 672 Views
BURN! *NM* - 29/11/2010 01:20:21 AM 307 Views
Re: And you know how RJ would've outlined the books from where? - 29/11/2010 08:16:12 AM 593 Views
so...you're guessing. - 30/11/2010 08:08:14 PM 644 Views
Re: so...you're guessing. - 01/12/2010 08:08:41 PM 561 Views
My only problems are Mats sudden drop in literacy and the timeline. *NM* - 27/11/2010 11:51:25 AM 313 Views
Not so much - 27/11/2010 09:52:23 PM 780 Views
I agree with this - 27/11/2010 10:37:08 PM 609 Views
Have some question - 28/11/2010 05:38:42 AM 687 Views
Re: Have some question - 28/11/2010 05:54:10 PM 624 Views
Re: Have some question - 28/11/2010 06:19:30 PM 602 Views
Re: Have some question - 28/11/2010 06:50:40 PM 580 Views
Re: Have some question - 28/11/2010 07:01:38 PM 738 Views
Re: Have some question - 29/11/2010 09:13:17 AM 581 Views
You stole my putters name, btw. - 29/11/2010 01:14:47 PM 701 Views
I had no problem following the jumps. - 29/11/2010 05:05:01 PM 598 Views
Yeah, anyone who found this bad clearly hasn't read Catch 22 - 30/11/2010 04:38:12 AM 567 Views
I didn't have any problems either. *NM* - 30/11/2010 04:40:24 AM 313 Views
I agree. Also, chopping up the timelines was the best decision given the circumstances. - 01/12/2010 02:02:07 PM 638 Views
Re: I agree. Also, chopping up the timelines was the best decision given the circumstances. - 01/12/2010 02:31:46 PM 586 Views
Re: I agree. Also, chopping up the timelines was the best decision given the circumstances. - 01/12/2010 08:17:57 PM 659 Views
Um. - 01/12/2010 08:49:35 PM 690 Views

Reply to Message