Active Users:1127 Time:22/11/2024 03:19:48 PM
Re: /Theory: Visions of the Future Insomdeon Send a noteboard - 01/12/2010 10:13:42 AM
Damane don't need to have children to keep the channeling gene alive, sul'dam can also pass the abililty along.


then why does the White Tower notices that the number of Aes Sedai is decreasing year after year?

the Aes Sedai make few children --- the damane very likely make much less
the male channelers are hunt and gentled (and eventually they die) in the Wetlends --- they are hunted and killed straight away on Seanchan

So, again, while what you say should make sense, it actually contradicts what happened in the books. If the number of channelers decreases in the Wetlends, for the very same reasons it should decrease even more on Seanchan.


The number of channellers coming to the tower decreases.

As has been shown, there is no lack of strong channellers out there. They are plentiful among the aiel, the seafolk, the seancan. The Two Rivers was crawling with them.

The decline of channellers in the tower is due to the towers increasingly isolationist policys over the centuries.

This is clearly illustrated by the massive jump in numbers when Egwene orders active recruiting for the first time. They find almost a thousand novices in the space of a few weeks.

Same goes for the black tower.

Besides, if channelling is genetic, then nonchannelling siblings of aes sedai etc would be carriers. As would squibs.
"I think I got the black lung Pop" - Derek Zoolander
Reply to message
/Theory: Visions of the Future - 30/11/2010 10:26:00 PM 1362 Views
Re: /Theory: Visions of the Future - 30/11/2010 10:59:43 PM 868 Views
Re: /Theory: Visions of the Future - 30/11/2010 11:57:07 PM 771 Views
precisely - 01/12/2010 12:28:36 AM 681 Views
damane children - 01/12/2010 12:46:05 AM 917 Views
Re: damane children - 01/12/2010 10:04:51 AM 725 Views
Re: damane children - 01/12/2010 10:47:42 AM 742 Views
Re: damane children - 01/12/2010 10:55:41 AM 711 Views
Re: /Theory: Visions of the Future - 01/12/2010 10:02:11 AM 633 Views
Re: /Theory: Visions of the Future - 01/12/2010 10:13:42 AM 1291 Views
wouldn't sul'dam live extra-long lives like regular channellers? - 02/12/2010 05:34:39 PM 755 Views
They never actually channel - 02/12/2010 07:29:06 PM 761 Views
Re: /Theory: Visions of the Future - 30/11/2010 11:59:49 PM 692 Views
The Seanchan have a huge war machine at their command... - 01/12/2010 12:16:09 AM 747 Views
Agreed - 01/12/2010 12:57:30 AM 773 Views
Re: /Theory: Visions of the Future - 01/12/2010 03:21:40 AM 658 Views
Re: /Theory: Visions of the Future - 01/12/2010 10:08:00 AM 575 Views
Re: /Theory: Visions of the Future - 01/12/2010 11:35:54 AM 635 Views
Re: /Theory: Visions of the Future - 01/12/2010 04:23:54 PM 627 Views
In the Battle of Dumai wells, the Ashaman were fighting mostly against non-channelers - 02/12/2010 01:42:47 AM 965 Views
The Damane - 02/12/2010 07:20:20 AM 723 Views
The Ashaman's batting average against other channeler groups has been mediocre. - 02/12/2010 10:05:51 AM 730 Views
Ya well I'm rubber and your glue :p - 02/12/2010 05:48:06 PM 801 Views
The Ashaman are not unbeatable. - 02/12/2010 10:44:22 PM 716 Views
Meh - 03/12/2010 07:48:55 AM 607 Views

Reply to Message