Active Users:1186 Time:22/11/2024 02:37:08 PM
In any case you can see why RJ wanted one book ajfurst Send a noteboard - 01/12/2010 01:41:56 AM
It's a pity they didn't split it into two books instead of three. Three books split by clusters or chronologically was going to be flawed in one of the ways discussed. Two books could have been split with it ending after Perrin destroyed the Dreamspike and the Shadowspawn.

So by that point in time you'd have had Rand, Egwene, Perrin's arc's completed, Avi's visions taking place when all those arcs are held up/in despair. Leaving only Perrin's talks with Elayne, Elayne's 'exciting' antics in Cairhien and Mat's ToG visit pushed to AMOL of the main arcs. Along with some of Lan and the Epilogue. And of those only the Moraine one missing would have disappointed fans. Sure TGS would have had 500 odd of the 750 odd pages of TOM and required more pages and/or a smaller font, but it would have resolved the problems of chronology - which for me is not the out of order, it's the lack of despair in TOM it caused - whilst still giving fans plenty of resolution.

Of course we would have had an extra 9-12 months to wait for the book in that case, so it wouldn't have been perfect. It would have been the best option though IMO. TGS would have had the Light set back then ready, then AMOL the Last Battle. A neat division, rather then an arbitrary one (TGS could just have easily been Rand and Perrin or Rand and Mat, with TOM Egwene and Perrin or Egwene and Mat).
This message last edited by ajfurst on 01/12/2010 at 01:46:19 AM
Reply to message
/tGS: These are damned good books. - 27/11/2010 02:22:05 AM 1392 Views
OK. *NM* - 27/11/2010 02:35:06 AM 296 Views
meh. ToM sucked for me. after tGS, I had become a bit hopeful, but now I see ... - 27/11/2010 03:39:49 AM 763 Views
You keep trying to make that nickname stick... - 27/11/2010 08:47:52 PM 759 Views
yeah!!..... - 27/11/2010 08:55:37 PM 681 Views
meh. - 27/11/2010 09:31:30 PM 630 Views
Yeah, they are - 27/11/2010 06:03:59 AM 694 Views
Disagree strongly on the time line issue - TOM showed what a mistake splitting by 'clusters' was IMO - 27/11/2010 07:24:55 AM 729 Views
Re: Disagree strongly on the time line issue - TOM showed what a mistake splitting by 'clusters' was - 27/11/2010 05:59:47 PM 629 Views
I agree with this as well. - 27/11/2010 06:31:37 PM 740 Views
Splitting it this way was the only realistic choice - 29/11/2010 01:58:52 PM 596 Views
Disagree - plus COT lacked almost anything full stop - 30/11/2010 12:03:24 AM 771 Views
Re: Disagree - plus COT lacked almost anything full stop - 30/11/2010 12:18:57 AM 633 Views
It will be better than CoT, sure, but still not good enough to appease most fans - 30/11/2010 06:20:38 PM 765 Views
In any case you can see why RJ wanted one book - 01/12/2010 01:41:56 AM 634 Views
BS style - 27/11/2010 07:25:38 AM 821 Views
That's the thing! If it was in its normal, Jordan paced writing, ... - 27/11/2010 08:52:05 AM 684 Views
Re: That's the thing! If it was in its normal, Jordan paced writing, ... - 27/11/2010 11:57:22 PM 669 Views
And you know how RJ would've outlined the books from where? - 28/11/2010 05:07:31 AM 672 Views
BURN! *NM* - 29/11/2010 01:20:21 AM 308 Views
Re: And you know how RJ would've outlined the books from where? - 29/11/2010 08:16:12 AM 593 Views
so...you're guessing. - 30/11/2010 08:08:14 PM 644 Views
Re: so...you're guessing. - 01/12/2010 08:08:41 PM 562 Views
My only problems are Mats sudden drop in literacy and the timeline. *NM* - 27/11/2010 11:51:25 AM 313 Views
Not so much - 27/11/2010 09:52:23 PM 780 Views
I agree with this - 27/11/2010 10:37:08 PM 609 Views
Have some question - 28/11/2010 05:38:42 AM 688 Views
Re: Have some question - 28/11/2010 05:54:10 PM 625 Views
Re: Have some question - 28/11/2010 06:19:30 PM 602 Views
Re: Have some question - 28/11/2010 06:50:40 PM 580 Views
Re: Have some question - 28/11/2010 07:01:38 PM 738 Views
Re: Have some question - 29/11/2010 09:13:17 AM 581 Views
You stole my putters name, btw. - 29/11/2010 01:14:47 PM 701 Views
I had no problem following the jumps. - 29/11/2010 05:05:01 PM 598 Views
Yeah, anyone who found this bad clearly hasn't read Catch 22 - 30/11/2010 04:38:12 AM 567 Views
I didn't have any problems either. *NM* - 30/11/2010 04:40:24 AM 314 Views

Reply to Message