Active Users:1136 Time:23/11/2024 03:08:57 AM
*claps* RugbyPlayingAshaman Send a noteboard - 30/11/2010 04:53:47 PM
I only want to note that the amount of saidar used at the Cleansing was smaller because they weren't trying to use the full amount - they used a large amount to cleanse saidin, but their purpose wasn't to wield the entirety of saidar at one time - that would have exhausted Nynaeve too quickly. When Rand channeled saidar through the Link, he sensed that it was almost as large as saidin but powerful in a different way.
"Those who think they have no time for bodily exercise will sooner or later have to find time for illness."
Reply to message
How far can balefire go? - 30/11/2010 07:20:47 AM 888 Views
Re: How far can balefire go? - 30/11/2010 09:30:56 AM 648 Views
I think of it as having a finite amount of "energy" - 30/11/2010 10:56:05 AM 531 Views
Re: I think of it as having a finite amount of "energy" - 30/11/2010 03:00:07 PM 526 Views
good thinking *NM* - 30/11/2010 03:29:17 PM 210 Views
Re: How far can balefire go? - 30/11/2010 03:54:18 PM 546 Views
5 miles unaided. And 5 miles x the strength multiplication of the Choedan Kal as a maximum. - 30/11/2010 04:37:21 PM 808 Views
*claps* - 30/11/2010 04:53:47 PM 534 Views
Agreed, but that doesn't nullify the calculation... - 30/11/2010 05:00:09 PM 616 Views
Lol, give over Shannow - 30/11/2010 05:15:54 PM 502 Views
But you miss the point of my reply to RugbyplayingAshaman... - 30/11/2010 06:54:33 PM 534 Views
I wasn't trying to nullify the calculation - I was making the point that saidin and saidar are equal - 30/11/2010 06:16:24 PM 476 Views
It's not that saidin is stronger than saidar at all... - 30/11/2010 06:51:01 PM 583 Views
Re: It's not that saidin is stronger than saidar at all... - 30/11/2010 07:08:25 PM 493 Views
*NM* - 30/11/2010 05:05:46 PM 568 Views
LMAO gg - 30/11/2010 05:13:55 PM 525 Views
they would both be dead, balefire cannot undo balfire - 30/11/2010 08:13:44 PM 535 Views
Theories - 30/11/2010 07:11:53 PM 549 Views
Re: Theories - 30/11/2010 08:54:49 PM 489 Views

Reply to Message