Active Users:1152 Time:22/11/2024 02:30:38 PM
Disagree - plus COT lacked almost anything full stop ajfurst Send a noteboard - 30/11/2010 12:03:24 AM

Although it would have risked TGS being accused of being another 'build up' book, even more after TOM splitting the books chronologically so TGS finished with Rand killing Semirhage and shown as Dark Rand, Egwene imprisoned after attending Elaida, Avi's vision shown, Perrin agreeing to a trial (and unable to Travel) and Mat having to wait in Caemlyn and ending on the Gholam having killed someone in his tent would have made much more sense IMO.

Then TGS would've been bashed by most readers, and rightly so, because it would've been all setup and no plot resolutions at all, and a lot of people would've given up on the series.

Sanderson and Team Jordan made the right choice, they couldn't afford that risk given the scepticism after the change of author and given how much nearly everyone hated CoT for lacking plot resolutions.

COT was basically 'WOW big channeling going on, view point 7 on it, followed by view point 8', with some 'Woah is me, Faile was captured before and I still haven't gotten her by the end' with the only bits of action Ituralde's in the prologue and Egwene's capture in the Epilogue.

TGS split as I suggest would still have had:

Rand's descent and the death of Semirhage
Egwene winning over the Aes Sedai until Elaida has her imprisoned (cliffhanger 1)
Mat fighting in hinderstap then the Gholam at the end (cliffhanger 2)
Perrin fighting Slayer, then finding himself trapped by the Dreamspike having to either fight the Whitecloaks or win his trial (cliffhanger 3)
Aviendha's visions

Plus you still had Tylee and Ituralde's battles in TGS would still be there. Nothing like COT. And with 3 cliffhangers at the end I'd be more inclined to think fans would be even more highly anticipating TOM to see what happened.
Reply to message
/tGS: These are damned good books. - 27/11/2010 02:22:05 AM 1392 Views
OK. *NM* - 27/11/2010 02:35:06 AM 296 Views
meh. ToM sucked for me. after tGS, I had become a bit hopeful, but now I see ... - 27/11/2010 03:39:49 AM 763 Views
You keep trying to make that nickname stick... - 27/11/2010 08:47:52 PM 759 Views
yeah!!..... - 27/11/2010 08:55:37 PM 681 Views
meh. - 27/11/2010 09:31:30 PM 629 Views
Yeah, they are - 27/11/2010 06:03:59 AM 694 Views
Disagree strongly on the time line issue - TOM showed what a mistake splitting by 'clusters' was IMO - 27/11/2010 07:24:55 AM 729 Views
Re: Disagree strongly on the time line issue - TOM showed what a mistake splitting by 'clusters' was - 27/11/2010 05:59:47 PM 629 Views
I agree with this as well. - 27/11/2010 06:31:37 PM 740 Views
Splitting it this way was the only realistic choice - 29/11/2010 01:58:52 PM 595 Views
Disagree - plus COT lacked almost anything full stop - 30/11/2010 12:03:24 AM 771 Views
Re: Disagree - plus COT lacked almost anything full stop - 30/11/2010 12:18:57 AM 633 Views
It will be better than CoT, sure, but still not good enough to appease most fans - 30/11/2010 06:20:38 PM 765 Views
In any case you can see why RJ wanted one book - 01/12/2010 01:41:56 AM 633 Views
BS style - 27/11/2010 07:25:38 AM 821 Views
That's the thing! If it was in its normal, Jordan paced writing, ... - 27/11/2010 08:52:05 AM 683 Views
Re: That's the thing! If it was in its normal, Jordan paced writing, ... - 27/11/2010 11:57:22 PM 669 Views
And you know how RJ would've outlined the books from where? - 28/11/2010 05:07:31 AM 672 Views
BURN! *NM* - 29/11/2010 01:20:21 AM 307 Views
Re: And you know how RJ would've outlined the books from where? - 29/11/2010 08:16:12 AM 593 Views
so...you're guessing. - 30/11/2010 08:08:14 PM 644 Views
Re: so...you're guessing. - 01/12/2010 08:08:41 PM 562 Views
My only problems are Mats sudden drop in literacy and the timeline. *NM* - 27/11/2010 11:51:25 AM 313 Views
Not so much - 27/11/2010 09:52:23 PM 780 Views
I agree with this - 27/11/2010 10:37:08 PM 609 Views
Have some question - 28/11/2010 05:38:42 AM 687 Views
Re: Have some question - 28/11/2010 05:54:10 PM 625 Views
Re: Have some question - 28/11/2010 06:19:30 PM 602 Views
Re: Have some question - 28/11/2010 06:50:40 PM 580 Views
Re: Have some question - 28/11/2010 07:01:38 PM 738 Views
Re: Have some question - 29/11/2010 09:13:17 AM 581 Views
You stole my putters name, btw. - 29/11/2010 01:14:47 PM 701 Views
I had no problem following the jumps. - 29/11/2010 05:05:01 PM 598 Views
Yeah, anyone who found this bad clearly hasn't read Catch 22 - 30/11/2010 04:38:12 AM 567 Views
I didn't have any problems either. *NM* - 30/11/2010 04:40:24 AM 313 Views

Reply to Message