Active Users:593 Time:05/04/2025 06:00:20 AM
Disagree - plus COT lacked almost anything full stop ajfurst Send a noteboard - 30/11/2010 12:03:24 AM

Although it would have risked TGS being accused of being another 'build up' book, even more after TOM splitting the books chronologically so TGS finished with Rand killing Semirhage and shown as Dark Rand, Egwene imprisoned after attending Elaida, Avi's vision shown, Perrin agreeing to a trial (and unable to Travel) and Mat having to wait in Caemlyn and ending on the Gholam having killed someone in his tent would have made much more sense IMO.

Then TGS would've been bashed by most readers, and rightly so, because it would've been all setup and no plot resolutions at all, and a lot of people would've given up on the series.

Sanderson and Team Jordan made the right choice, they couldn't afford that risk given the scepticism after the change of author and given how much nearly everyone hated CoT for lacking plot resolutions.

COT was basically 'WOW big channeling going on, view point 7 on it, followed by view point 8', with some 'Woah is me, Faile was captured before and I still haven't gotten her by the end' with the only bits of action Ituralde's in the prologue and Egwene's capture in the Epilogue.

TGS split as I suggest would still have had:

Rand's descent and the death of Semirhage
Egwene winning over the Aes Sedai until Elaida has her imprisoned (cliffhanger 1)
Mat fighting in hinderstap then the Gholam at the end (cliffhanger 2)
Perrin fighting Slayer, then finding himself trapped by the Dreamspike having to either fight the Whitecloaks or win his trial (cliffhanger 3)
Aviendha's visions

Plus you still had Tylee and Ituralde's battles in TGS would still be there. Nothing like COT. And with 3 cliffhangers at the end I'd be more inclined to think fans would be even more highly anticipating TOM to see what happened.
Reply to message
/tGS: These are damned good books. - 27/11/2010 02:22:05 AM 1467 Views
OK. *NM* - 27/11/2010 02:35:06 AM 330 Views
meh. ToM sucked for me. after tGS, I had become a bit hopeful, but now I see ... - 27/11/2010 03:39:49 AM 830 Views
You keep trying to make that nickname stick... - 27/11/2010 08:47:52 PM 833 Views
yeah!!..... - 27/11/2010 08:55:37 PM 756 Views
meh. - 27/11/2010 09:31:30 PM 699 Views
Yeah, they are - 27/11/2010 06:03:59 AM 762 Views
Disagree strongly on the time line issue - TOM showed what a mistake splitting by 'clusters' was IMO - 27/11/2010 07:24:55 AM 804 Views
Re: Disagree strongly on the time line issue - TOM showed what a mistake splitting by 'clusters' was - 27/11/2010 05:59:47 PM 701 Views
I agree with this as well. - 27/11/2010 06:31:37 PM 811 Views
Splitting it this way was the only realistic choice - 29/11/2010 01:58:52 PM 671 Views
Disagree - plus COT lacked almost anything full stop - 30/11/2010 12:03:24 AM 843 Views
Re: Disagree - plus COT lacked almost anything full stop - 30/11/2010 12:18:57 AM 697 Views
It will be better than CoT, sure, but still not good enough to appease most fans - 30/11/2010 06:20:38 PM 831 Views
In any case you can see why RJ wanted one book - 01/12/2010 01:41:56 AM 703 Views
BS style - 27/11/2010 07:25:38 AM 890 Views
That's the thing! If it was in its normal, Jordan paced writing, ... - 27/11/2010 08:52:05 AM 756 Views
Re: That's the thing! If it was in its normal, Jordan paced writing, ... - 27/11/2010 11:57:22 PM 740 Views
And you know how RJ would've outlined the books from where? - 28/11/2010 05:07:31 AM 749 Views
BURN! *NM* - 29/11/2010 01:20:21 AM 332 Views
Re: And you know how RJ would've outlined the books from where? - 29/11/2010 08:16:12 AM 672 Views
so...you're guessing. - 30/11/2010 08:08:14 PM 729 Views
Re: so...you're guessing. - 01/12/2010 08:08:41 PM 636 Views
My only problems are Mats sudden drop in literacy and the timeline. *NM* - 27/11/2010 11:51:25 AM 346 Views
Not so much - 27/11/2010 09:52:23 PM 858 Views
I agree with this - 27/11/2010 10:37:08 PM 684 Views
Have some question - 28/11/2010 05:38:42 AM 754 Views
Re: Have some question - 28/11/2010 05:54:10 PM 699 Views
Re: Have some question - 28/11/2010 06:19:30 PM 677 Views
Re: Have some question - 28/11/2010 06:50:40 PM 653 Views
Re: Have some question - 28/11/2010 07:01:38 PM 806 Views
Re: Have some question - 29/11/2010 09:13:17 AM 658 Views
You stole my putters name, btw. - 29/11/2010 01:14:47 PM 784 Views
I had no problem following the jumps. - 29/11/2010 05:05:01 PM 666 Views
Yeah, anyone who found this bad clearly hasn't read Catch 22 - 30/11/2010 04:38:12 AM 645 Views
I didn't have any problems either. *NM* - 30/11/2010 04:40:24 AM 347 Views

Reply to Message