OK, I've just finished the Book in a mammoth reading session, after waiting 3 weeks for Amazon to deliver it to me, but that's the curse of living in a Third World country, I guess.
I hear you.
Mesaana TRADED Graendal an angreal? I find that very unlikely, and out of character. Does that mean Mesaana had an angreal herself? All evidence up to now suggested the contrary.
Mesaana found one between LoC and when she gave it to Graendal. I still don't think that the Forsaken would easily use an angreal unless they really needed to. They're all stronger than 99% of channelers.
So Moiraine without the ivory bracelet angreal is too weak to pass the Accepted test, but with it she is stronger than she was before? Also, the Foxes said it was such a strong angreal that it bordered on being a sa'angreal. Moiraine was at least 3 times as strong as Dagian, while she must now be less than half as strong as Dagian, if she cannot even pass the Accepted test.
I think Moiraine might be as strong as Siuan is, which would be a nice twist.
That means that Lanfear's angreal at the Docks must have increased her strength AT LEAST six fold, and more like 8 or ten fold. No wonder she was toying with Rand in that battle.
I don't think you can extrapolate things like that, and I definitely don't think RJ thought of it either. However, by all accounts Lanfear has a very strong angreal. As I said to another poster, Rand said she was getting stronger and stronger as the battle went on. She could probably have drawn even more saidar through the thing until she smothered him.
Tying off gateways:
I've read Sanderson's reply to the issue of tying off gateways, but frankly, his answer avoided the issue and talked about the logistical implications of Ashaman being able to tie off gateways necessitating that they not be able to do it.
Frankly, that's a non-answer. Rand has tied off gateways and Sammael has tied of gateways. It is clearly possible, and fairly easy, to tie off gateways. There is no logical explanation that has been given as yet as to why Grady and Neald are not able to tie off gateways. Sanderson needs to up his game here, or admit that he has changed the rules to suit his plot.
I've read Sanderson's reply to the issue of tying off gateways, but frankly, his answer avoided the issue and talked about the logistical implications of Ashaman being able to tie off gateways necessitating that they not be able to do it.
Frankly, that's a non-answer. Rand has tied off gateways and Sammael has tied of gateways. It is clearly possible, and fairly easy, to tie off gateways. There is no logical explanation that has been given as yet as to why Grady and Neald are not able to tie off gateways. Sanderson needs to up his game here, or admit that he has changed the rules to suit his plot.
Agreed. While it takes some stress to make a gateway, you merely need to tie it off with a decent knot. It's idiotic not to do it and then complain about exhaustion.
Interfering with the creation of gateways on a battlefield:
Was the Dreamspike what RJ was talking about when he said that there are ways to interfere with the creation of gateways into a battlefield zone, and ways to interfere with the interference etc?
I recall that we had an almighty debate about that one, with me stating that it HAD to be some kind of ward that prevented the creation of gateways into a specific AREA, while the doubters insisted that all RJ meant was that one could attack an individual gateway weave as it was forming and try to slash it before it opened. The Dreamspike at least proved my suggestion was the correct one.
However, I do not believe the Dreamspike is the ONLY way of doing this. I would think that there must be a One Power weave that can replicate this effect, and that it can be actively countered and counter-countered, if you get my meaning. Hence RJ's statement that the battle would be fought on many levels, on an Age of Legends battlefield.
Was the Dreamspike what RJ was talking about when he said that there are ways to interfere with the creation of gateways into a battlefield zone, and ways to interfere with the interference etc?
I recall that we had an almighty debate about that one, with me stating that it HAD to be some kind of ward that prevented the creation of gateways into a specific AREA, while the doubters insisted that all RJ meant was that one could attack an individual gateway weave as it was forming and try to slash it before it opened. The Dreamspike at least proved my suggestion was the correct one.
However, I do not believe the Dreamspike is the ONLY way of doing this. I would think that there must be a One Power weave that can replicate this effect, and that it can be actively countered and counter-countered, if you get my meaning. Hence RJ's statement that the battle would be fought on many levels, on an Age of Legends battlefield.
I immediately thought about that debate, and I think it is what RJ referred to, but on a larger scale as you suggest. It's strange that it has to work from TAR, but considering its a weave I think LTT or someone could ward a smaller area against travelling.
I've got a lot more to say, but let's keep this first post short, and get some responses. Man, we have so much new material to work with. It is only AFTER completing the book that the real fun actually starts!
No Demandred facts? Very disappointing Shannow. We had some nice new facts about him.
Wheel of Time board admin
Fan of Lanfear
Fan of Lanfear
This message last edited by Sidious on 28/11/2010 at 06:20:15 PM
Finished ToM - immediate Forsaken and One Power issues (angreal, gateways, Forsaken facts)
- 28/11/2010 08:48:35 AM
1282 Views
Re: Finished ToM - immediate Forsaken and One Power issues (angreal, gateways, Forsaken facts)
- 28/11/2010 12:31:13 PM
1292 Views
Re: Finished ToM - immediate Forsaken and One Power issues (angreal, gateways, Forsaken facts)
- 28/11/2010 05:48:42 PM
607 Views
Re: Finished ToM - immediate Forsaken and One Power issues (angreal, gateways, Forsaken facts)
- 28/11/2010 05:57:34 PM
850 Views
Re: Finished ToM - immediate Forsaken and One Power issues (angreal, gateways, Forsaken facts)
- 28/11/2010 06:11:38 PM
586 Views
Re: Finished ToM - immediate Forsaken and One Power issues (angreal, gateways, Forsaken facts)
- 29/11/2010 09:08:30 AM
567 Views
Not to mention that Mesaana was tortured by SH without being mindtrapped *NM*
- 02/12/2010 05:57:15 PM
245 Views
Re: Finished ToM - immediate Forsaken and One Power issues (angreal, gateways, Forsaken facts)
- 29/11/2010 12:08:39 AM
1114 Views
yeah, it seems to make more sense that they would have general channeling fatigue
- 30/11/2010 05:54:39 AM
625 Views