Active Users:475 Time:04/04/2025 11:01:33 PM
Sorry, Dominic, but I strongly disagree. Skeeve the Great Send a noteboard - 28/11/2010 05:30:28 AM
The more I look at TGS and TOM, I really don't see how you could've split the four story lines there. The way you proposed it to be, it would've been something like this:
- first books is a dull story of Perrin's fighting his leadership identity and moving his camp from one muddy place to another, another book about unresolved and boring Aes Sedai politiking, Rand's going badly worse and doing basically nothing and as final "do nothing plot" we would've been reading more about Mat going to every tavern in Caemlyn; As a result, most of the readers would've hated it.
- suddenly in the second book, Perrin accepts his leaderships and doing his awesome stuff in TAR with White Tower plot resolved out of blue, Rand became Zen and Moraine is rescued.

I frankly don't see how you could resolve better what's been resolved. Each story line resolved in TGS (Egwene uniting White Tower and Rand becoming Zen) was resolved in very nice way. I don't see how it could've been resolved in shorter chapters. Each story line resolved in ToM (Perrin, Mat and Elayne) was resolved nicely too. And again, I don't see how you could've put less chapters there as well. That means that each of story lines requires at least half a book to be resolved.

If we are to split the books by timeline - that leaves us with the first book with four storylines unresolved, but almost at the point of resolution. And all resolution for all storylines happen in the second book. Frankly I hate it much more than mere timeline inconvinience.



This message last edited by Skeeve the Great on 28/11/2010 at 05:33:35 AM
Reply to message
What was the purpose of Graendal?! - 25/11/2010 03:54:29 PM 1615 Views
BS wanted to put her behind a "complicated" plot - 25/11/2010 04:11:01 PM 896 Views
Yes, it's BSand's fault. RJ couldn't have EVER planned it all out himself right? Yes mm hmm - 25/11/2010 04:19:02 PM 832 Views
read DomA's review. BullShit ruined the series. *NM* - 25/11/2010 04:31:56 PM 401 Views
Links or it didn't happen. - 25/11/2010 04:53:24 PM 789 Views
oh but, bookwyrm, now they have such a nice easy scapegoat!! *NM* - 26/11/2010 01:35:53 AM 357 Views
And DomA is such infallible authority on the all things WoT why? *NM* - 25/11/2010 06:00:42 PM 377 Views
I'd say that DomA is one of the most thoughtful posters here. He researches his comments and gives - 25/11/2010 06:47:58 PM 817 Views
You got me wrong - 25/11/2010 07:11:43 PM 934 Views
That doesn't mean he has any actual evidence as to BS tampering with RJ's notes - 26/11/2010 01:33:08 AM 734 Views
Re: That doesn't mean he has any actual evidence as to BS tampering with RJ's notes - 26/11/2010 03:47:38 PM 728 Views
Okay, what would you have had him do? - 27/11/2010 01:54:19 AM 656 Views
Interesting question. - 27/11/2010 02:58:55 AM 815 Views
Re: Interesting question. - 27/11/2010 07:56:38 PM 796 Views
Re: Interesting question. - 27/11/2010 11:52:53 PM 615 Views
Sorry, Dominic, but I strongly disagree. - 28/11/2010 05:30:28 AM 652 Views
Re: Okay, what would you have had him do? - 27/11/2010 06:02:22 PM 620 Views
clearly the timeline is wonky, but it's easy enough to keep track of - 04/12/2010 05:32:34 PM 827 Views
A minor aside - 26/11/2010 02:49:03 PM 647 Views
oops minor omission, i meant the last 3 books were meant to be one big tome *NM* - 26/11/2010 04:40:53 PM 329 Views
Meh, even that is pretty ridiculous - 26/11/2010 06:32:20 PM 608 Views
Well - 26/11/2010 03:01:46 PM 665 Views
Lots - 25/11/2010 04:38:52 PM 873 Views
Re: Lots - 25/11/2010 04:53:38 PM 728 Views
What is the point of anything then? - 25/11/2010 05:01:15 PM 860 Views
Re: What is the point of anything then? - 25/11/2010 05:07:30 PM 745 Views
Re: What is the point of anything then? - 25/11/2010 05:11:15 PM 778 Views
I don't agree with "deus ex machina style" - 25/11/2010 05:58:19 PM 837 Views
Re: I don't agree with "deus ex machina style" - 25/11/2010 06:22:31 PM 764 Views
Re: I don't agree with "deus ex machina style" - 25/11/2010 06:34:57 PM 718 Views
Re: I don't agree with "deus ex machina style" - 25/11/2010 08:43:38 PM 715 Views
Re: I don't agree with "deus ex machina style" - 25/11/2010 08:47:10 PM 717 Views
I imagine it is both. - 25/11/2010 11:37:21 PM 738 Views
No, it wasn't obvious. - 26/11/2010 03:25:09 AM 656 Views
Well, it was after I read it. - 26/11/2010 02:03:20 PM 698 Views
Yes, she was useless to this storyline. - 25/11/2010 11:40:57 PM 776 Views
If it hadn't been Graendal, it WOULD have been rather contrived... - 26/11/2010 01:35:12 AM 618 Views
Well, we were under the impression that Moridin alone had access to the True Power. - 26/11/2010 02:36:31 AM 849 Views
I was under the impression other Forsaken had access as well, something pointed out by their POVs .. - 27/11/2010 09:09:17 AM 632 Views
No, only Moridin - 27/11/2010 06:43:17 PM 622 Views
Please. - 26/11/2010 03:16:36 AM 742 Views
Hmm? - 26/11/2010 06:56:01 AM 638 Views
NM *NM* - 26/11/2010 07:29:40 AM 385 Views

Reply to Message