Active Users:1198 Time:22/11/2024 09:37:27 PM
Sorry, Dominic, but I strongly disagree. Skeeve the Great Send a noteboard - 28/11/2010 05:30:28 AM
The more I look at TGS and TOM, I really don't see how you could've split the four story lines there. The way you proposed it to be, it would've been something like this:
- first books is a dull story of Perrin's fighting his leadership identity and moving his camp from one muddy place to another, another book about unresolved and boring Aes Sedai politiking, Rand's going badly worse and doing basically nothing and as final "do nothing plot" we would've been reading more about Mat going to every tavern in Caemlyn; As a result, most of the readers would've hated it.
- suddenly in the second book, Perrin accepts his leaderships and doing his awesome stuff in TAR with White Tower plot resolved out of blue, Rand became Zen and Moraine is rescued.

I frankly don't see how you could resolve better what's been resolved. Each story line resolved in TGS (Egwene uniting White Tower and Rand becoming Zen) was resolved in very nice way. I don't see how it could've been resolved in shorter chapters. Each story line resolved in ToM (Perrin, Mat and Elayne) was resolved nicely too. And again, I don't see how you could've put less chapters there as well. That means that each of story lines requires at least half a book to be resolved.

If we are to split the books by timeline - that leaves us with the first book with four storylines unresolved, but almost at the point of resolution. And all resolution for all storylines happen in the second book. Frankly I hate it much more than mere timeline inconvinience.



This message last edited by Skeeve the Great on 28/11/2010 at 05:33:35 AM
Reply to message
What was the purpose of Graendal?! - 25/11/2010 03:54:29 PM 1567 Views
BS wanted to put her behind a "complicated" plot - 25/11/2010 04:11:01 PM 833 Views
Yes, it's BSand's fault. RJ couldn't have EVER planned it all out himself right? Yes mm hmm - 25/11/2010 04:19:02 PM 770 Views
read DomA's review. BullShit ruined the series. *NM* - 25/11/2010 04:31:56 PM 386 Views
Links or it didn't happen. - 25/11/2010 04:53:24 PM 716 Views
oh but, bookwyrm, now they have such a nice easy scapegoat!! *NM* - 26/11/2010 01:35:53 AM 327 Views
And DomA is such infallible authority on the all things WoT why? *NM* - 25/11/2010 06:00:42 PM 359 Views
I'd say that DomA is one of the most thoughtful posters here. He researches his comments and gives - 25/11/2010 06:47:58 PM 749 Views
You got me wrong - 25/11/2010 07:11:43 PM 865 Views
That doesn't mean he has any actual evidence as to BS tampering with RJ's notes - 26/11/2010 01:33:08 AM 658 Views
Re: That doesn't mean he has any actual evidence as to BS tampering with RJ's notes - 26/11/2010 03:47:38 PM 684 Views
Okay, what would you have had him do? - 27/11/2010 01:54:19 AM 589 Views
Interesting question. - 27/11/2010 02:58:55 AM 749 Views
Re: Interesting question. - 27/11/2010 07:56:38 PM 728 Views
Re: Interesting question. - 27/11/2010 11:52:53 PM 581 Views
Sorry, Dominic, but I strongly disagree. - 28/11/2010 05:30:28 AM 599 Views
Re: Okay, what would you have had him do? - 27/11/2010 06:02:22 PM 553 Views
clearly the timeline is wonky, but it's easy enough to keep track of - 04/12/2010 05:32:34 PM 757 Views
A minor aside - 26/11/2010 02:49:03 PM 574 Views
oops minor omission, i meant the last 3 books were meant to be one big tome *NM* - 26/11/2010 04:40:53 PM 306 Views
Meh, even that is pretty ridiculous - 26/11/2010 06:32:20 PM 542 Views
Well - 26/11/2010 03:01:46 PM 593 Views
Lots - 25/11/2010 04:38:52 PM 803 Views
Re: Lots - 25/11/2010 04:53:38 PM 654 Views
What is the point of anything then? - 25/11/2010 05:01:15 PM 797 Views
Re: What is the point of anything then? - 25/11/2010 05:07:30 PM 674 Views
Re: What is the point of anything then? - 25/11/2010 05:11:15 PM 707 Views
I don't agree with "deus ex machina style" - 25/11/2010 05:58:19 PM 778 Views
Re: I don't agree with "deus ex machina style" - 25/11/2010 06:22:31 PM 704 Views
Re: I don't agree with "deus ex machina style" - 25/11/2010 06:34:57 PM 652 Views
Re: I don't agree with "deus ex machina style" - 25/11/2010 08:43:38 PM 652 Views
Re: I don't agree with "deus ex machina style" - 25/11/2010 08:47:10 PM 648 Views
I imagine it is both. - 25/11/2010 11:37:21 PM 670 Views
No, it wasn't obvious. - 26/11/2010 03:25:09 AM 579 Views
Well, it was after I read it. - 26/11/2010 02:03:20 PM 633 Views
Yes, she was useless to this storyline. - 25/11/2010 11:40:57 PM 713 Views
If it hadn't been Graendal, it WOULD have been rather contrived... - 26/11/2010 01:35:12 AM 553 Views
Well, we were under the impression that Moridin alone had access to the True Power. - 26/11/2010 02:36:31 AM 771 Views
I was under the impression other Forsaken had access as well, something pointed out by their POVs .. - 27/11/2010 09:09:17 AM 573 Views
No, only Moridin - 27/11/2010 06:43:17 PM 551 Views
Please. - 26/11/2010 03:16:36 AM 676 Views
Hmm? - 26/11/2010 06:56:01 AM 600 Views
NM *NM* - 26/11/2010 07:29:40 AM 356 Views

Reply to Message