Active Users:726 Time:19/12/2024 02:14:12 AM
IMO it was Cyndane. DomA Send a noteboard - 28/11/2010 03:10:09 AM
We know Cyndane and Moghedien both spent some efforts to try to get Perrin and Mat killed.

I've always suspected Lanfear tampered with Masema.

I don't really see who else but Lanfear would conceive in TDR that sending "divine visions" to a madman like Masema so he built for Rand a religious following of utter fanatics was a good notion. None but Lanfear had this notion that she would control Rand sooner than later, and rule with him under the DO. So in the end, Masema's followers would be Rand's, and thus Lanfear's. She merely had to add worship of herself to the mix, down the line.

Also, this was all accomplished through dreams, and that's one of Lanfear's MO.

I think Masema is just one of her avorted projects. She's started it, and moved on. When Moridin ordered the Chosen to get Perrin and Mat killed, Cyndane tried to use Masema again, and it worked.. but his chosen pawn failed.

The attempt in Amadicia and Masema were the only attemps made on Perrin, so if Graendal is right that Cyndane and Moghedien were trying to accomplish those orders, it has to be one or the other who's behind it. Cyndane appearing as a divine version of Rand makes a lot more sense than Moghedien doing it. It has the style of Lanfear all over it, IMO.




Reply to message
Masema and the Dragon - 28/11/2010 12:55:58 AM 1257 Views
Re: Masema and the Dragon - 28/11/2010 01:43:26 AM 949 Views
But wrong... - 28/11/2010 03:12:46 AM 1015 Views
i always figured it was demandred. *NM* - 28/11/2010 02:27:08 AM 309 Views
+1 *NM* - 28/11/2010 11:59:25 PM 291 Views
IMO it was Cyndane. - 28/11/2010 03:10:09 AM 912 Views
Seconded *NM* - 28/11/2010 09:05:17 AM 316 Views
To be honest, tho, what is Moggy's style? - 28/11/2010 08:29:56 PM 876 Views
Does she has one? - 29/11/2010 12:57:11 AM 915 Views
You make a good case for Lanfear - 29/11/2010 02:24:03 AM 655 Views
Re: You make a good case for Lanfear - 03/12/2010 08:18:01 PM 814 Views
I agree with you and Luckers - 28/11/2010 07:20:00 AM 872 Views
Re: I agree with you and Luckers - 28/11/2010 09:03:58 PM 728 Views
Re: I agree with you and Luckers - 29/11/2010 12:06:39 AM 632 Views

Reply to Message