Let me just start by saying that when I heard about Mr. Jordan dying, I was crestfallen two-fold, once for poor Jim who was such a fantastic storyteller, and twice for the Wheel of Time that deserved an ending. I was just anxious to find out how it ended even if they only released Mr. Jordan's notes. I hoped someone would pick it up, and my hopes came true. I expected the stories to still be okay, but not great, and that was a sacrifice I was prepared to make. Brandon absolutely blew me away, and I am not disappointed in the slightest. He blew all my expectations out of the water. But, anyway...
I actually started writing down the Sanderson-isms that were "the worst" in my opinion, and then about halfway through the book it just gripped me so tightly that I forgot to pay attention.
There are 2 instances involving Mat where the words "Gentlemanly" and "Gentlemen" are used that really bothered me, a spot where Perrin says out loud that he "chewed someone out" for something (the banners again, I think), and there were several spots where Sanderson used the word "really" where I believe Mr. Jordan would have used the word "very". Often used in the sense of "Wow, that fireball was really big!" Using "really" that way is a modern colloquialism, which was absent in every one of Jordan's books. (I haven't looked it up or anything, but can you remember RJ ever saying "That's really big!" 'cause I can't.)
Of course, those were just the ones that bugged me enough that they actually pushed me out of the story for a minute. I'm riding along with Perrin in a forest, and then all of a sudden I'm back in my apartment holding a book going, "Oh, yeah, this is Brandon."
To be fair though, he's done a lot of positive things with the characters' personalities, and he got the major ones right, like Rand and Mat, etc. He also does a great job of letting me read 100 or so pages at a swath without remembering that this isn't still my RJ.
Have you considered the fact that Mr. Jordan's battle scenes were so well-written because he was in Nam, but Brandon can pull off similar scenes with powerful imagery and breathless intensity without having seen a combat situation himself? That is what I thought would be hardest for him, and he did it great.
I guess what I'm trying to say is I know exactly what you mean, and it's noticeable, but in many ways I consider it an improvement, and I can forgive him the others, because at least I get to find out how this story ends, and it's as close to RJ writing it himself as humanly possible.
I am truly astounded that Brandon has done as well as he had. He is a true fan of Mr. Jordan, as he would have to be to be able to write this complicated tapestry of an epic, and he is a fantastic author. Nobody but Mr. Jordan himself would have done better, and in some cases, I think Brandon even won!
I actually started writing down the Sanderson-isms that were "the worst" in my opinion, and then about halfway through the book it just gripped me so tightly that I forgot to pay attention.
There are 2 instances involving Mat where the words "Gentlemanly" and "Gentlemen" are used that really bothered me, a spot where Perrin says out loud that he "chewed someone out" for something (the banners again, I think), and there were several spots where Sanderson used the word "really" where I believe Mr. Jordan would have used the word "very". Often used in the sense of "Wow, that fireball was really big!" Using "really" that way is a modern colloquialism, which was absent in every one of Jordan's books. (I haven't looked it up or anything, but can you remember RJ ever saying "That's really big!" 'cause I can't.)
Of course, those were just the ones that bugged me enough that they actually pushed me out of the story for a minute. I'm riding along with Perrin in a forest, and then all of a sudden I'm back in my apartment holding a book going, "Oh, yeah, this is Brandon."
To be fair though, he's done a lot of positive things with the characters' personalities, and he got the major ones right, like Rand and Mat, etc. He also does a great job of letting me read 100 or so pages at a swath without remembering that this isn't still my RJ.
Have you considered the fact that Mr. Jordan's battle scenes were so well-written because he was in Nam, but Brandon can pull off similar scenes with powerful imagery and breathless intensity without having seen a combat situation himself? That is what I thought would be hardest for him, and he did it great.
I guess what I'm trying to say is I know exactly what you mean, and it's noticeable, but in many ways I consider it an improvement, and I can forgive him the others, because at least I get to find out how this story ends, and it's as close to RJ writing it himself as humanly possible.
I am truly astounded that Brandon has done as well as he had. He is a true fan of Mr. Jordan, as he would have to be to be able to write this complicated tapestry of an epic, and he is a fantastic author. Nobody but Mr. Jordan himself would have done better, and in some cases, I think Brandon even won!
Some of the language in tGS and ToM really grinds my gears.
I know it is impossible for BS to write characters exactly as RJ would have and that some will inevitably change, but I don't think it is impossible to keep the narrative within the same boundaries of vocab and theme as the earlier books.
In particular, the use of modern phrases such as "authorize" "discipline reports" "geometric shapes" and so on has leaped out at me.
The structure of the text and vocab used are greatly different to the RJ written books. This really grates on me and detracts from my enjoyment of the books. It annoys me more than the, slightly off characters that are inevitable when a new writer takes on another's creations.
Does anyone else notice this?
I know it is impossible for BS to write characters exactly as RJ would have and that some will inevitably change, but I don't think it is impossible to keep the narrative within the same boundaries of vocab and theme as the earlier books.
In particular, the use of modern phrases such as "authorize" "discipline reports" "geometric shapes" and so on has leaped out at me.
The structure of the text and vocab used are greatly different to the RJ written books. This really grates on me and detracts from my enjoyment of the books. It annoys me more than the, slightly off characters that are inevitable when a new writer takes on another's creations.
Does anyone else notice this?
I always say, if you must mount the gallows, give a jest to the crowd, a coin to the hangman, and make the drop with a smile on your lips. ~Birgitte
Language
20/11/2010 11:28:51 PM
- 1010 Views
Yes, often.
21/11/2010 04:34:35 AM
- 774 Views