Active Users:1136 Time:23/11/2024 04:06:08 AM
Re: He's special the same way any individual is special. Sidious Send a noteboard - 15/09/2009 04:39:39 PM
I tend to think Lews Therin was made the First because of his leadership abilities - he seems to have had some rare Talents, but none of which were as impressive as the skills possessed by the Forsaken and some of Rand's Third Age companions. Perhaps he was a consensus builder, and a capable leader (ie: somewhat like a Blue Ajah Amyrlin - one of their greatest Sisters was considered to be Eadyth who was said to be "one of the most capable Blues in the last one hundred years"...as an Ajah, they seem to prize versatility). Because choosing your leader on the basis of One Power strength doesn't seem to gel with their society, in which strength wasn't as important due to the uniquitousness of Circles. If people referred to leadership qualities, I'd not raise any objections, but the reasons people trot out for Lews to be awarded "Best Man Ever!" always have to do with Talents, OP strength and t'a'veren status - none of which have anything to do with his personality or skills.


I agree and disagree. I also think that LTT was chosen as the First among Servants because of his leadership skills - he was akin to a world leader anyway. There is another dimension, though, and that is the One Power. I think that the Aes Sedai in the Age of Legends paid quite a lot of attention to ability with their gifts. For instance, the only reason that Balthamel wasn't fired from his job was because of his strength in the Power. This means that they placed influence on the person's ability, which isn't very utopian at all. It's also convenient that Lews Therin is the strongest possible channeler in the Power, which means it's difficult to say that his ability in saidin wasn't relevant. Furthermore, I find it difficult to believe he wasn't a very skilled man too. Even you say that the Forsaken were very skilled and Talented, and yet none of them ever managed to overcome him, and still consider him to be their toughest physical opponent.

That said, Ishamael still lurks somewhere in the evil supervillain category. Basically, he sucks. And I haven't seen anything to prove otherwise. His whole backstory revolves around being defeated again and again - we don't even have any stories of his successes during the War of Power, unlike the other Forsaken. The only "success" he had was turning Hawkwing against Aes Sedai and the formation of the Black Ajah - both of which are rather lackluster in comparison to Lews Therin, Latra Posae or a Rashima Kerenmosa. So his only claim to villainy is being a philosopher who is somewhat of a nihilist (?).


Well it's obvious why Ishamael is like that - his victory would mean the end of the Light, and no story for us to read. If he defeated Lews Therin at the duel, or Rand at any stage, that would kind of be the end of everything. He may be unable to defeat Lews Therin but that doesn't mean he's a total loser - he might just be 2nd to Lews Therin. There's a fictional component to this villainy.
Wheel of Time board admin
Fan of Lanfear
Reply to message
The top 6 Forsaken - similar in the One Power - 12/09/2009 09:27:20 PM 1682 Views
Some thoughts about Semmy - 12/09/2009 09:59:50 PM 855 Views
Re: Some thoughts about Semmy - 13/09/2009 08:33:28 AM 909 Views
Of course... - 13/09/2009 08:36:39 AM 717 Views
I've been thinking the same for years - 12/09/2009 11:25:02 PM 818 Views
The Big White Book says... - 12/09/2009 11:46:43 PM 883 Views
Not Aginor - 13/09/2009 08:36:37 AM 883 Views
Re: Not Aginor - 13/09/2009 03:16:13 PM 778 Views
Re: Not Aginor - 13/09/2009 05:47:14 PM 815 Views
Fact is, the bwb is untrustworthy - 13/09/2009 05:54:28 PM 741 Views
We must either use all the quotes from the BWB or none of them - 13/09/2009 06:07:46 PM 797 Views
Or... - 13/09/2009 08:41:23 PM 722 Views
Re: Or... - 14/09/2009 04:46:52 AM 697 Views
But, RJ himself said that the BWB was written from the standpoint of a scholar - 14/09/2009 04:42:59 PM 716 Views
Re: Not Aginor - 13/09/2009 08:17:28 PM 687 Views
It all depends on how you define "powerful" - 14/09/2009 02:30:31 AM 826 Views
I agree 101%. *NM* - 14/09/2009 03:49:51 AM 424 Views
I think power is much more than raw strength - 14/09/2009 05:00:10 AM 699 Views
I agree for the most part, but disagree on one thing. - 14/09/2009 07:52:10 PM 821 Views
Re: The top 6 Forsaken - similar in the One Power - 12/09/2009 11:48:03 PM 751 Views
the other reason - 13/09/2009 03:24:24 PM 677 Views
So is graendal similar to lanfear then? - 13/09/2009 05:41:42 PM 693 Views
Graendal could fight Lanfear and win - 13/09/2009 06:01:57 PM 1228 Views
Graendal herself says... - 13/09/2009 09:08:46 PM 714 Views
Re: Graendal herself says... - 14/09/2009 04:48:37 AM 729 Views
Doesn't Graendal have an Angreal now? - 17/09/2009 03:29:10 AM 743 Views
Re: Graendal herself says... - 15/09/2009 05:36:53 PM 614 Views
Lanfear was more powerful than Graendal, but Cyndane has less power - 13/09/2009 10:19:35 PM 691 Views
Re: So is graendal similar to lanfear then? - 13/09/2009 06:05:11 PM 826 Views
I agree with this - 13/09/2009 06:15:24 PM 846 Views
Compulsion=any other deadly weave. Doesn't really change matters - 13/09/2009 10:23:40 PM 695 Views
Excellent point *NM* - 13/09/2009 10:35:08 PM 434 Views
But it did give her an edge, and against two forsaken. *NM* - 13/09/2009 11:12:09 PM 405 Views
Hm? When? *NM* - 14/09/2009 09:04:10 PM 334 Views
tPoD, when she compelled Cyndane and Moghedien. *NM* - 14/09/2009 10:19:23 PM 387 Views
Not at all - 14/09/2009 04:51:48 AM 769 Views
Using Compulsion on someone doesn't seem mechanically different - 14/09/2009 09:03:41 PM 612 Views
I'm not so sure about that - 14/09/2009 09:36:45 PM 714 Views
Totally agree - 14/09/2009 10:26:07 PM 516 Views
I don't agree. - 15/09/2009 04:33:04 PM 831 Views
Re: So is graendal similar to lanfear then? - 14/09/2009 04:34:24 PM 670 Views
But Graendal confronted her... twice! *NM* - 13/09/2009 07:48:29 PM 363 Views
Apparently only the third time counts *NM* - 13/09/2009 08:00:37 PM 390 Views
Really? - 13/09/2009 08:36:33 PM 679 Views
No falsely... - 13/09/2009 11:25:40 PM 890 Views
That's pretty much my opinion in a nutshell - 14/09/2009 04:56:15 AM 831 Views
And, of course, the male and female OP strength ranks might not even correlate that much - 14/09/2009 04:41:58 PM 647 Views
They correlate on some critical points - 14/09/2009 06:57:43 PM 728 Views
That's not exactly what I'm referring to. - 15/09/2009 04:36:29 PM 597 Views
But then we are discussing the same thing - 15/09/2009 06:59:04 PM 739 Views
I think, outside of semantics, our main disagreement doesn't lie amid the higher tiers - 16/09/2009 03:53:09 PM 613 Views
Probably - 16/09/2009 06:31:27 PM 747 Views
Re: Probably - 16/09/2009 07:19:03 PM 718 Views
Re: Probably - 16/09/2009 08:59:31 PM 670 Views
Re: Probably - 18/09/2009 07:03:09 PM 1004 Views
Ahh the old debate... - 17/09/2009 12:42:36 AM 688 Views
Re: Ahh the old debate... - 17/09/2009 05:26:52 AM 630 Views
I only disagree on one point, I think they are all rather equal in potential, incl. Ishamael - 14/09/2009 04:28:12 PM 690 Views
I do think Ishamel is special - 14/09/2009 07:04:03 PM 784 Views
He's special the same way any individual is special. - 14/09/2009 11:36:42 PM 737 Views
Re: He's special the same way any individual is special. - 15/09/2009 08:36:20 AM 723 Views
Re: He's special the same way any individual is special. - 15/09/2009 03:48:34 PM 708 Views
Re: He's special the same way any individual is special. - 15/09/2009 04:39:39 PM 682 Views
Re: He's special the same way any individual is special. - 15/09/2009 04:53:00 PM 670 Views
Re: He's special the same way any individual is special. - 15/09/2009 06:47:45 PM 661 Views
The more interesting question is... - 14/09/2009 06:34:11 PM 648 Views
Hmmm - 14/09/2009 07:04:34 PM 667 Views
I think we'll see Graendal vs. Aran'gar. - 14/09/2009 07:31:16 PM 741 Views
Ah yes, that makes sense, and would be great! *NM* - 14/09/2009 07:40:29 PM 530 Views
Yeah. Though I think its no competition. Graendal has got to be better than a walking tree! - 14/09/2009 07:50:09 PM 629 Views
They do imply that Graendal is a lot more dangerous than she looks - 14/09/2009 09:08:43 PM 659 Views
I've never underestimated Graendal - 14/09/2009 09:42:49 PM 690 Views
Yeah... her frivolity was always a red flag for me too. - 14/09/2009 10:18:40 PM 691 Views
To me, she is the most lethal. - 15/09/2009 05:18:10 PM 521 Views
Yup... - 15/09/2009 06:39:20 PM 567 Views
I still like Lanfear more - 15/09/2009 06:51:03 PM 646 Views
Bah! She's an idiot! - 15/09/2009 07:06:06 PM 661 Views
only in love *NM* - 15/09/2009 07:23:29 PM 639 Views
Graendal did not beat me and Moghedien - 15/09/2009 05:59:39 PM 730 Views
Agreed - 15/09/2009 06:36:48 PM 646 Views
Ummm... how do we know? - 15/09/2009 06:40:57 PM 789 Views
Re: Ummm... how do we know? - 15/09/2009 06:56:21 PM 686 Views
Hmmm... - 15/09/2009 07:07:45 PM 839 Views

Reply to Message