Active Users:1195 Time:23/11/2024 03:52:11 AM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
That's not exactly what I'm referring to. RugbyPlayingAshaman Send a noteboard - 15/09/2009 04:36:29 PM
I'm basically saying that the way a female channeler would achieve an effect is different from the way a male channeler would achieve an effect ie: a skill, strength minimum or ability that is important for one may not be important for the other.

So Semirhage, Lanfear and Graendal could stand against Demandred, Sammael and Ishamael because they were all equivalent after taking into account different factors.
"Those who think they have no time for bodily exercise will sooner or later have to find time for illness."
Reply to message
The top 6 Forsaken - similar in the One Power Sidious - 12/09/2009 09:27:20 PM 1682 Views
Some thoughts about Semmy Lordling - 12/09/2009 09:59:50 PM 855 Views
Re: Some thoughts about Semmy Sidious - 13/09/2009 08:33:28 AM 909 Views
Of course... Digital_Eon - 13/09/2009 08:36:39 AM 717 Views
I've been thinking the same for years Dragonsworn - 12/09/2009 11:25:02 PM 818 Views
The Big White Book says... Yvves - 12/09/2009 11:46:43 PM 883 Views
Not Aginor Sidious - 13/09/2009 08:36:37 AM 883 Views
Re: Not Aginor NaClH2O - 13/09/2009 03:16:13 PM 778 Views
Re: Not Aginor Sidious - 13/09/2009 05:47:14 PM 814 Views
Fact is, the bwb is untrustworthy Shannow - 13/09/2009 05:54:28 PM 741 Views
We must either use all the quotes from the BWB or none of them Sidious - 13/09/2009 06:07:46 PM 797 Views
Or... Shannow - 13/09/2009 08:41:23 PM 722 Views
Re: Or... Sidious - 14/09/2009 04:46:52 AM 697 Views
But, RJ himself said that the BWB was written from the standpoint of a scholar RugbyPlayingAshaman - 14/09/2009 04:42:59 PM 715 Views
Re: Not Aginor NaClH2O - 13/09/2009 08:17:28 PM 687 Views
It all depends on how you define "powerful" Lanfear - 14/09/2009 02:30:31 AM 825 Views
I agree 101%. *NM* Yvves - 14/09/2009 03:49:51 AM 423 Views
I think power is much more than raw strength Sidious - 14/09/2009 05:00:10 AM 698 Views
I agree for the most part, but disagree on one thing. Lanfear - 14/09/2009 07:52:10 PM 821 Views
Re: The top 6 Forsaken - similar in the One Power Bulgakov - 12/09/2009 11:48:03 PM 751 Views
the other reason NaClH2O - 13/09/2009 03:24:24 PM 676 Views
So is graendal similar to lanfear then? Shannow - 13/09/2009 05:41:42 PM 693 Views
Graendal could fight Lanfear and win Sidious - 13/09/2009 06:01:57 PM 1228 Views
Graendal herself says... Shannow - 13/09/2009 09:08:46 PM 714 Views
Re: Graendal herself says... Sidious - 14/09/2009 04:48:37 AM 728 Views
Doesn't Graendal have an Angreal now? Rurouni_Kenshin - 17/09/2009 03:29:10 AM 743 Views
Re: Graendal herself says... Lanfear - 15/09/2009 05:36:53 PM 614 Views
Lanfear was more powerful than Graendal, but Cyndane has less power beetnemesis - 13/09/2009 10:19:35 PM 691 Views
Re: So is graendal similar to lanfear then? Watcher - 13/09/2009 06:05:11 PM 826 Views
I agree with this Sidious - 13/09/2009 06:15:24 PM 846 Views
Compulsion=any other deadly weave. Doesn't really change matters beetnemesis - 13/09/2009 10:23:40 PM 694 Views
Excellent point *NM* Shannow - 13/09/2009 10:35:08 PM 434 Views
But it did give her an edge, and against two forsaken. *NM* fionwe1987 - 13/09/2009 11:12:09 PM 404 Views
Hm? When? *NM* beetnemesis - 14/09/2009 09:04:10 PM 334 Views
tPoD, when she compelled Cyndane and Moghedien. *NM* fionwe1987 - 14/09/2009 10:19:23 PM 386 Views
Not at all Sidious - 14/09/2009 04:51:48 AM 769 Views
Using Compulsion on someone doesn't seem mechanically different beetnemesis - 14/09/2009 09:03:41 PM 612 Views
I'm not so sure about that Sidious - 14/09/2009 09:36:45 PM 714 Views
Totally agree Shannow - 14/09/2009 10:26:07 PM 516 Views
I don't agree. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 15/09/2009 04:33:04 PM 831 Views
Re: So is graendal similar to lanfear then? RugbyPlayingAshaman - 14/09/2009 04:34:24 PM 670 Views
But Graendal confronted her... twice! *NM* fionwe1987 - 13/09/2009 07:48:29 PM 363 Views
Apparently only the third time counts *NM* Sidious - 13/09/2009 08:00:37 PM 390 Views
But the third time's supposed to be lucky. So that won't count either. *NM* fionwe1987 - 13/09/2009 11:26:18 PM 416 Views
Really? Shannow - 13/09/2009 08:36:33 PM 679 Views
No falsely... fionwe1987 - 13/09/2009 11:25:40 PM 890 Views
That's pretty much my opinion in a nutshell Sidious - 14/09/2009 04:56:15 AM 831 Views
And, of course, the male and female OP strength ranks might not even correlate that much RugbyPlayingAshaman - 14/09/2009 04:41:58 PM 647 Views
They correlate on some critical points Sidious - 14/09/2009 06:57:43 PM 728 Views
That's not exactly what I'm referring to. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 15/09/2009 04:36:29 PM 597 Views
But then we are discussing the same thing Sidious - 15/09/2009 06:59:04 PM 738 Views
I think, outside of semantics, our main disagreement doesn't lie amid the higher tiers RugbyPlayingAshaman - 16/09/2009 03:53:09 PM 613 Views
Probably Sidious - 16/09/2009 06:31:27 PM 746 Views
Re: Probably RugbyPlayingAshaman - 16/09/2009 07:19:03 PM 718 Views
Re: Probably Sidious - 16/09/2009 08:59:31 PM 670 Views
Re: Probably RugbyPlayingAshaman - 18/09/2009 07:03:09 PM 1004 Views
Ahh the old debate... fionwe1987 - 17/09/2009 12:42:36 AM 688 Views
Re: Ahh the old debate... Sidious - 17/09/2009 05:26:52 AM 630 Views
I only disagree on one point, I think they are all rather equal in potential, incl. Ishamael RugbyPlayingAshaman - 14/09/2009 04:28:12 PM 690 Views
I do think Ishamel is special Sidious - 14/09/2009 07:04:03 PM 784 Views
He's special the same way any individual is special. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 14/09/2009 11:36:42 PM 737 Views
Re: He's special the same way any individual is special. Sidious - 15/09/2009 08:36:20 AM 723 Views
Re: He's special the same way any individual is special. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 15/09/2009 03:48:34 PM 707 Views
Re: He's special the same way any individual is special. Sidious - 15/09/2009 04:39:39 PM 681 Views
Re: He's special the same way any individual is special. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 15/09/2009 04:53:00 PM 670 Views
Re: He's special the same way any individual is special. Sidious - 15/09/2009 06:47:45 PM 661 Views
The more interesting question is... AgentOrange - 14/09/2009 06:34:11 PM 647 Views
Hmmm Sidious - 14/09/2009 07:04:34 PM 667 Views
I think we'll see Graendal vs. Aran'gar. fionwe1987 - 14/09/2009 07:31:16 PM 741 Views
Ah yes, that makes sense, and would be great! *NM* Sidious - 14/09/2009 07:40:29 PM 530 Views
Yeah. Though I think its no competition. Graendal has got to be better than a walking tree! fionwe1987 - 14/09/2009 07:50:09 PM 629 Views
They do imply that Graendal is a lot more dangerous than she looks beetnemesis - 14/09/2009 09:08:43 PM 658 Views
I've never underestimated Graendal Sidious - 14/09/2009 09:42:49 PM 690 Views
Yeah... her frivolity was always a red flag for me too. fionwe1987 - 14/09/2009 10:18:40 PM 691 Views
To me, she is the most lethal. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 15/09/2009 05:18:10 PM 521 Views
Yup... fionwe1987 - 15/09/2009 06:39:20 PM 567 Views
I still like Lanfear more Sidious - 15/09/2009 06:51:03 PM 646 Views
Bah! She's an idiot! fionwe1987 - 15/09/2009 07:06:06 PM 661 Views
only in love *NM* Sidious - 15/09/2009 07:23:29 PM 639 Views
Graendal did not beat me and Moghedien Lanfear - 15/09/2009 05:59:39 PM 729 Views
Agreed Sidious - 15/09/2009 06:36:48 PM 645 Views
Ummm... how do we know? fionwe1987 - 15/09/2009 06:40:57 PM 789 Views
Re: Ummm... how do we know? Sidious - 15/09/2009 06:56:21 PM 685 Views
Hmmm... fionwe1987 - 15/09/2009 07:07:45 PM 839 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes