Active Users:749 Time:24/02/2025 01:37:38 PM
Yep. Fanatic-Templar Send a noteboard - 16/11/2010 12:59:42 AM

This only works because the state of the food was theoretically unknown, so while it was rational of Iralin to suspect that the sacks not opened would be rotten as well, he didn't know. Rand could not have caused an impossible scenario to be true, only a highly implausible one.


Does it make a sound?

You're saying, simply because it's been unobserved by humans, it could be anything, but once it's observed by humans, it's set?

Sorry, can't buy that one.


Probably because it makes no logical sense. In this case, it's still true though.
The first rule of being a ninja is "do no harm". Unless you intend to do harm, then do lots of harm.
~Master Splinter

Victorious in Bergioyn's legendary 'Reverse Mafia'. *MySmiley*
Reply to message
Rand, new and improved. - 12/11/2010 03:53:38 AM 2121 Views
Re: Rand, new and improved. - 12/11/2010 04:14:17 AM 1081 Views
Schrödinger's grain Best nerdy comment ever *NM* - 12/11/2010 02:29:27 PM 379 Views
*NM* - 12/11/2010 05:34:41 PM 349 Views
Taking ta'veren to the next level, basically. - 12/11/2010 07:19:10 PM 4076 Views
Re: Rand, new and improved. - 14/11/2010 08:30:10 AM 872 Views
But Rand didn't change what they were. - 14/11/2010 06:31:50 PM 740 Views
If no one is around, and a tree falls in a forest.... - 15/11/2010 07:22:41 PM 610 Views
It's called quantum mechanics in the "real world". - 15/11/2010 07:40:52 PM 603 Views
Yep. - 16/11/2010 12:59:42 AM 620 Views
Not completely true - 15/11/2010 07:48:15 PM 772 Views
Re: Not completely true - 15/11/2010 08:40:14 PM 866 Views
Re: Rand, new and improved. - 13/11/2010 03:51:02 PM 1010 Views
Re: Rand, new and improved. - 14/11/2010 08:21:14 AM 686 Views
Good summary - 13/11/2010 08:52:23 PM 774 Views
Lady Torkumen jumped out a WINDOW, y'know. - 14/11/2010 12:31:50 AM 790 Views
Re: Lady Torkumen jumped out a WINDOW, y'know. - 14/11/2010 08:10:01 AM 940 Views
Ah, gotcha, thanks and sorry. - 14/11/2010 03:28:51 PM 786 Views

Reply to Message