Active Users:630 Time:31/03/2026 12:45:25 PM
Yep. Fanatic-Templar Send a noteboard - 16/11/2010 12:59:42 AM

This only works because the state of the food was theoretically unknown, so while it was rational of Iralin to suspect that the sacks not opened would be rotten as well, he didn't know. Rand could not have caused an impossible scenario to be true, only a highly implausible one.


Does it make a sound?

You're saying, simply because it's been unobserved by humans, it could be anything, but once it's observed by humans, it's set?

Sorry, can't buy that one.


Probably because it makes no logical sense. In this case, it's still true though.
The first rule of being a ninja is "do no harm". Unless you intend to do harm, then do lots of harm.
~Master Splinter

Victorious in Bergioyn's legendary 'Reverse Mafia'. *MySmiley*
Reply to message
Rand, new and improved. - 12/11/2010 03:53:38 AM 2352 Views
Re: Rand, new and improved. - 12/11/2010 04:14:17 AM 1313 Views
Schrödinger's grain Best nerdy comment ever *NM* - 12/11/2010 02:29:27 PM 477 Views
*NM* - 12/11/2010 05:34:41 PM 459 Views
Taking ta'veren to the next level, basically. - 12/11/2010 07:19:10 PM 4335 Views
Re: Rand, new and improved. - 14/11/2010 08:30:10 AM 1111 Views
But Rand didn't change what they were. - 14/11/2010 06:31:50 PM 941 Views
If no one is around, and a tree falls in a forest.... - 15/11/2010 07:22:41 PM 822 Views
It's called quantum mechanics in the "real world". - 15/11/2010 07:40:52 PM 817 Views
Yep. - 16/11/2010 12:59:42 AM 837 Views
Not completely true - 15/11/2010 07:48:15 PM 1006 Views
Re: Not completely true - 15/11/2010 08:40:14 PM 1085 Views
Re: Rand, new and improved. - 13/11/2010 03:51:02 PM 1271 Views
Re: Rand, new and improved. - 14/11/2010 08:21:14 AM 932 Views
Good summary - 13/11/2010 08:52:23 PM 989 Views
Lady Torkumen jumped out a WINDOW, y'know. - 14/11/2010 12:31:50 AM 987 Views
Re: Lady Torkumen jumped out a WINDOW, y'know. - 14/11/2010 08:10:01 AM 1168 Views
Ah, gotcha, thanks and sorry. - 14/11/2010 03:28:51 PM 1014 Views

Reply to Message