Active Users:409 Time:04/04/2025 12:06:04 PM
Yep. Fanatic-Templar Send a noteboard - 16/11/2010 12:59:42 AM

This only works because the state of the food was theoretically unknown, so while it was rational of Iralin to suspect that the sacks not opened would be rotten as well, he didn't know. Rand could not have caused an impossible scenario to be true, only a highly implausible one.


Does it make a sound?

You're saying, simply because it's been unobserved by humans, it could be anything, but once it's observed by humans, it's set?

Sorry, can't buy that one.


Probably because it makes no logical sense. In this case, it's still true though.
The first rule of being a ninja is "do no harm". Unless you intend to do harm, then do lots of harm.
~Master Splinter

Victorious in Bergioyn's legendary 'Reverse Mafia'. *MySmiley*
Reply to message
Rand, new and improved. - 12/11/2010 03:53:38 AM 2134 Views
Re: Rand, new and improved. - 12/11/2010 04:14:17 AM 1099 Views
Schrödinger's grain Best nerdy comment ever *NM* - 12/11/2010 02:29:27 PM 384 Views
*NM* - 12/11/2010 05:34:41 PM 355 Views
Taking ta'veren to the next level, basically. - 12/11/2010 07:19:10 PM 4088 Views
Re: Rand, new and improved. - 14/11/2010 08:30:10 AM 897 Views
But Rand didn't change what they were. - 14/11/2010 06:31:50 PM 750 Views
If no one is around, and a tree falls in a forest.... - 15/11/2010 07:22:41 PM 621 Views
It's called quantum mechanics in the "real world". - 15/11/2010 07:40:52 PM 618 Views
Yep. - 16/11/2010 12:59:42 AM 632 Views
Not completely true - 15/11/2010 07:48:15 PM 782 Views
Re: Not completely true - 15/11/2010 08:40:14 PM 876 Views
Re: Rand, new and improved. - 13/11/2010 03:51:02 PM 1022 Views
Re: Rand, new and improved. - 14/11/2010 08:21:14 AM 699 Views
Good summary - 13/11/2010 08:52:23 PM 787 Views
Lady Torkumen jumped out a WINDOW, y'know. - 14/11/2010 12:31:50 AM 808 Views
Re: Lady Torkumen jumped out a WINDOW, y'know. - 14/11/2010 08:10:01 AM 952 Views
Ah, gotcha, thanks and sorry. - 14/11/2010 03:28:51 PM 799 Views

Reply to Message