Active Users:1954 Time:19/01/2025 04:25:37 PM
Yep. Fanatic-Templar Send a noteboard - 16/11/2010 12:59:42 AM

This only works because the state of the food was theoretically unknown, so while it was rational of Iralin to suspect that the sacks not opened would be rotten as well, he didn't know. Rand could not have caused an impossible scenario to be true, only a highly implausible one.


Does it make a sound?

You're saying, simply because it's been unobserved by humans, it could be anything, but once it's observed by humans, it's set?

Sorry, can't buy that one.


Probably because it makes no logical sense. In this case, it's still true though.
The first rule of being a ninja is "do no harm". Unless you intend to do harm, then do lots of harm.
~Master Splinter

Victorious in Bergioyn's legendary 'Reverse Mafia'. *MySmiley*
Reply to message
Rand, new and improved. - 12/11/2010 03:53:38 AM 2087 Views
Re: Rand, new and improved. - 12/11/2010 04:14:17 AM 1047 Views
Schrödinger's grain Best nerdy comment ever *NM* - 12/11/2010 02:29:27 PM 364 Views
*NM* - 12/11/2010 05:34:41 PM 338 Views
Taking ta'veren to the next level, basically. - 12/11/2010 07:19:10 PM 4048 Views
Re: Rand, new and improved. - 14/11/2010 08:30:10 AM 845 Views
But Rand didn't change what they were. - 14/11/2010 06:31:50 PM 709 Views
If no one is around, and a tree falls in a forest.... - 15/11/2010 07:22:41 PM 573 Views
It's called quantum mechanics in the "real world". - 15/11/2010 07:40:52 PM 568 Views
Yep. - 16/11/2010 12:59:42 AM 584 Views
Not completely true - 15/11/2010 07:48:15 PM 739 Views
Re: Not completely true - 15/11/2010 08:40:14 PM 833 Views
Re: Rand, new and improved. - 13/11/2010 03:51:02 PM 978 Views
Re: Rand, new and improved. - 14/11/2010 08:21:14 AM 658 Views
Good summary - 13/11/2010 08:52:23 PM 740 Views
Lady Torkumen jumped out a WINDOW, y'know. - 14/11/2010 12:31:50 AM 754 Views
Re: Lady Torkumen jumped out a WINDOW, y'know. - 14/11/2010 08:10:01 AM 916 Views
Ah, gotcha, thanks and sorry. - 14/11/2010 03:28:51 PM 753 Views

Reply to Message