Active Users:520 Time:05/07/2025 07:18:41 PM
7 out of 10 RugbyPlayingAshaman Send a noteboard - 15/11/2010 07:27:09 PM
I think Brian Sanderson did a pretty good job, but on a personal note I wasn't invested in some of the characters that were given major POVs, which made the book seem like it was trying to make their roles be larger than they had to be as a matter of checking off a list of things to wrap up (Gawyn, Perrin and Galad fall into this category). I did notice the timeline issue that some readers had warned us about moreso than I thought I would - it becomes a problem when I tried to consider where the various characters were in relation to each other, and I had to consciously remind myself to not think about it. This could have been solved by creative editing and moving some sections around - it really felt as if the flow of the story was off even though the pace was going well.
"Those who think they have no time for bodily exercise will sooner or later have to find time for illness."
Reply to message
Post your review of Towers of Midnight - 07/11/2010 04:20:11 PM 10989 Views
Received Book On Friday... At Chapter 23... - 07/11/2010 08:29:29 PM 1448 Views
Liked it pretty good - 07/11/2010 10:34:23 PM 1628 Views
Re: Liked it pretty good - 07/11/2010 11:02:39 PM 1659 Views
Makes a lot of sense really *NM* - 08/11/2010 12:55:47 AM 702 Views
Re: Liked it pretty good - 10/11/2010 04:30:06 AM 1201 Views
Fair assessment. - 16/11/2010 06:39:56 AM 1288 Views
5/10 *spoliers* - 08/11/2010 07:54:10 PM 1630 Views
About not sensing gholam. Nobody sensed him. It's the ability of the thing, I think *NM* - 08/11/2010 08:03:45 PM 707 Views
If so, then I forgot. I'd like a reference to that, though. *NM* - 08/11/2010 08:06:05 PM 743 Views
It does make logical sense... - 08/11/2010 10:49:51 PM 1299 Views
You wanted MORE of Elayne's political maneuvering ? - 08/11/2010 11:18:42 PM 1462 Views
Yes. I personally would've liked all that to be more detailed. - 09/11/2010 06:11:44 PM 1309 Views
That should have been more detailed... - 05/12/2010 02:46:07 AM 1254 Views
Some parts, yes. *NM* - 05/12/2010 04:18:21 PM 747 Views
6.9 out of 10, Does the Job with Some Nice Moments - 10/11/2010 04:26:08 AM 1497 Views
<Whoops, posted in the wrong place> *NM* - 26/11/2010 07:29:22 AM 614 Views
5 out of 10. it's ok, but... - 15/11/2010 05:59:00 PM 1445 Views
Seriously? - 05/12/2010 02:50:15 AM 1518 Views
7 out of 10 - 15/11/2010 07:27:09 PM 1345 Views
9 out of 10 - 15/11/2010 08:27:00 PM 1380 Views
4/5 Expected a bit more about the BT - 17/11/2010 04:17:25 AM 1452 Views
Moves plot along, however severely flawed. - 20/11/2010 11:43:39 PM 1391 Views
And this is why being a critic sucks... - 26/11/2010 07:33:45 AM 1186 Views
Re: Moves plot along, however severely flawed. - 19/12/2010 05:40:56 AM 1772 Views
8.5/10, enjoyed it alot. *NM* - 26/11/2010 07:30:32 AM 829 Views
I'm an idiot - 04/12/2010 06:18:46 PM 1576 Views
Re: I'm an idiot - 05/12/2010 01:53:23 PM 1164 Views
Re: I'm an idiot - 19/12/2010 05:48:30 AM 1288 Views
After a very long break from WoT... I'm back into it and loving it! - 05/12/2010 03:08:57 AM 1379 Views
Verdict: it was OK, 6.5/10, maybe 7, I need to reread it - 03/01/2011 02:41:34 AM 1555 Views
8 out of 10 - 09/01/2011 05:19:37 PM 1395 Views
Solid but not great continuation of the series, both exciting and flawed - 05/04/2011 08:34:48 AM 1386 Views

Reply to Message