Active Users:422 Time:30/03/2026 06:54:45 PM
7 out of 10 RugbyPlayingAshaman Send a noteboard - 15/11/2010 07:27:09 PM
I think Brian Sanderson did a pretty good job, but on a personal note I wasn't invested in some of the characters that were given major POVs, which made the book seem like it was trying to make their roles be larger than they had to be as a matter of checking off a list of things to wrap up (Gawyn, Perrin and Galad fall into this category). I did notice the timeline issue that some readers had warned us about moreso than I thought I would - it becomes a problem when I tried to consider where the various characters were in relation to each other, and I had to consciously remind myself to not think about it. This could have been solved by creative editing and moving some sections around - it really felt as if the flow of the story was off even though the pace was going well.
"Those who think they have no time for bodily exercise will sooner or later have to find time for illness."
Reply to message
Post your review of Towers of Midnight - 07/11/2010 04:20:11 PM 11183 Views
Received Book On Friday... At Chapter 23... - 07/11/2010 08:29:29 PM 1660 Views
Liked it pretty good - 07/11/2010 10:34:23 PM 1878 Views
Re: Liked it pretty good - 07/11/2010 11:02:39 PM 1876 Views
Makes a lot of sense really *NM* - 08/11/2010 12:55:47 AM 817 Views
Re: Liked it pretty good - 10/11/2010 04:30:06 AM 1412 Views
Fair assessment. - 16/11/2010 06:39:56 AM 1513 Views
5/10 *spoliers* - 08/11/2010 07:54:10 PM 1863 Views
About not sensing gholam. Nobody sensed him. It's the ability of the thing, I think *NM* - 08/11/2010 08:03:45 PM 799 Views
If so, then I forgot. I'd like a reference to that, though. *NM* - 08/11/2010 08:06:05 PM 878 Views
It does make logical sense... - 08/11/2010 10:49:51 PM 1476 Views
You wanted MORE of Elayne's political maneuvering ? - 08/11/2010 11:18:42 PM 1674 Views
Yes. I personally would've liked all that to be more detailed. - 09/11/2010 06:11:44 PM 1520 Views
That should have been more detailed... - 05/12/2010 02:46:07 AM 1452 Views
Some parts, yes. *NM* - 05/12/2010 04:18:21 PM 873 Views
6.9 out of 10, Does the Job with Some Nice Moments - 10/11/2010 04:26:08 AM 1722 Views
<Whoops, posted in the wrong place> *NM* - 26/11/2010 07:29:22 AM 708 Views
5 out of 10. it's ok, but... - 15/11/2010 05:59:00 PM 1655 Views
Seriously? - 05/12/2010 02:50:15 AM 1758 Views
7 out of 10 - 15/11/2010 07:27:09 PM 1558 Views
9 out of 10 - 15/11/2010 08:27:00 PM 1571 Views
4/5 Expected a bit more about the BT - 17/11/2010 04:17:25 AM 1681 Views
Moves plot along, however severely flawed. - 20/11/2010 11:43:39 PM 1595 Views
And this is why being a critic sucks... - 26/11/2010 07:33:45 AM 1403 Views
Re: Moves plot along, however severely flawed. - 19/12/2010 05:40:56 AM 1982 Views
8.5/10, enjoyed it alot. *NM* - 26/11/2010 07:30:32 AM 943 Views
I'm an idiot - 04/12/2010 06:18:46 PM 1871 Views
Re: I'm an idiot - 05/12/2010 01:53:23 PM 1359 Views
Re: I'm an idiot - 19/12/2010 05:48:30 AM 1507 Views
After a very long break from WoT... I'm back into it and loving it! - 05/12/2010 03:08:57 AM 1620 Views
Verdict: it was OK, 6.5/10, maybe 7, I need to reread it - 03/01/2011 02:41:34 AM 1763 Views
8 out of 10 - 09/01/2011 05:19:37 PM 1601 Views
Solid but not great continuation of the series, both exciting and flawed - 05/04/2011 08:34:48 AM 1604 Views

Reply to Message