Active Users:797 Time:15/11/2024 08:55:25 AM
Re: RJ and Darrel Sweet are laughing at you. axl666 Send a noteboard - 06/11/2010 01:27:17 PM
RJ set up such an interesting world and story in books 1-6 that he could have made books 7-10 3000 pages of Conan the Barbarian's poetry and you still would have bought book 11.

And he could have written a 1000 page catalogue of furniture and dresses, had Darrel Sweet draw a midget with crayons on the cover, put a poo scented scratch and sniff on the dedication page, called it book 12 of WoT and you still would have bought it. He knows this and he is still laughing at you.

You are going to read ToM. You know it, I know it, and RJ knows it. And regardless of the hatchet job that ToM is, you are going to read book 14 too.


No! I will resist!

I'm going to get the final volume of the Tad Williams shadowmarch series instead. Now there's an author who always has things under control, and is a good writer as a well.

Maybe at some point in the future we'll get a 'reader's preferred edition' of the last three wot books, with all the best bits in one book. I'd think about getting that.
Reply to message
My mostly spoiler-free review of the book (mixed-to-negative, for those who care) - 05/11/2010 03:21:42 PM 2294 Views
Eh, eh... more positive than me, it's unexpected - 05/11/2010 08:38:59 PM 4701 Views
There's plenty of blame to spread around - 06/11/2010 10:42:47 AM 1161 Views
Re: Eh, eh... more positive than me, it's unexpected - 06/11/2010 11:29:10 AM 1092 Views
Ouch - 06/11/2010 12:57:44 PM 2253 Views
Well, I like it. It reminded me a lot of first books *NM* - 08/11/2010 03:33:09 PM 713 Views
Re: My mostly spoiler-free review of the book (mixed-to-negative, for those who care) - 05/11/2010 10:46:23 PM 1138 Views
RJ and Darrel Sweet are laughing at you. - 06/11/2010 03:52:45 AM 1079 Views
Re: RJ and Darrel Sweet are laughing at you. - 06/11/2010 01:27:17 PM 1065 Views
Re: My mostly spoiler-free review of the book (mixed-to-negative, for those who care) - 05/11/2010 11:51:48 PM 1443 Views
Re: lol - 06/11/2010 03:49:18 PM 1185 Views
Ahh, OK - 12/11/2010 12:57:56 AM 941 Views

Reply to Message