Active Users:685 Time:13/12/2025 01:25:56 PM
Re: Yes. saidarisnowtainted Send a noteboard - 04/11/2010 06:42:05 PM
c'mon. what i'm talking about is the big deal that RJ made of the fact that Asmo's death was made final by virtue of how he died and where he died.

The basic idea is that we knew there was a decent chance that Graendal was planning to meet Rhavin in Caemlyn then in order to link up and go to assist Sammael when (they thought) Rand attacked him. So she shows up during the fight and sees balefire flying around everywhere, and knows that she can't track Rhavin down in order to link with him, since she would probably get killed before she had time to do so, so she hangs out and hides, waiting to see what happened, and if there is any advantage she can get from it. Asmo walks in, and he can't be allowed to live because he knows her, so...*shrug*

The reason we were supposted to know is because we knew that Graendal and Rhavin were meeting regularly in order to be ready for Rand's attack on illian. This was enough to put her into the most likely suspects list, but hardly enough to determine for certain that she was behind it until it was revealed in ToM. I think that RJ just overestimated how easy it would be to figure it out because HE knew which facts were important and which were not. He knew that there was no way Lanfear could have done it(we didn't know enough about the Finns or her fate to know that), etc. If you know what evidence is the critical evidence, its easy to reach a conclusion. If you do not...*shrug*

That explains why she was there, but not how she killed him or what happened to him (presumably balefired). Nor does it explain why the 'where' he died was important in identifying the killer.


Thank you! That is the issue i am having. Ok, so it was Graendal. Fine. the author said so. But this stupid "how AND why" issue was the reason why i didnt think it was her in the first place. And now i would love it if there was some explanation from the author other than simply stating that graendal was responsible.
Reply to message
Explaining Asmo - ToM SPOILERS - 04/11/2010 06:08:54 PM 1480 Views
Yes. - 04/11/2010 06:12:21 PM 1259 Views
Re: Yes. - 04/11/2010 06:17:51 PM 1006 Views
Re: Yes. - 04/11/2010 06:29:16 PM 1029 Views
Re: Yes. - 04/11/2010 06:34:42 PM 795 Views
Re: Yes. - 04/11/2010 06:42:05 PM 1071 Views
Re: Yes. - 04/11/2010 07:00:42 PM 803 Views
Re: Yes. - 04/11/2010 07:31:18 PM 979 Views
Re: Yes. - 04/11/2010 06:29:23 PM 803 Views
Re: Yes. - 04/11/2010 06:40:08 PM 823 Views
Re: Yes. - 04/11/2010 06:43:02 PM 911 Views
Re: Yes. - 04/11/2010 06:47:44 PM 813 Views
Re: Yes. - 04/11/2010 06:55:01 PM 860 Views
Re: Yes. - 04/11/2010 07:24:53 PM 783 Views
Re: Yes. - 04/11/2010 07:47:37 PM 683 Views
it is actually a combo of slayer and graendal theories: - 04/11/2010 07:16:53 PM 791 Views
Re: it is actually a combo of slayer and graendal theories: - 04/11/2010 07:23:39 PM 823 Views
Well, the prevalent pre-reveal theory was... - 06/11/2010 07:14:46 AM 1031 Views

Reply to Message